| Literature DB >> 35755477 |
Kaunda Yamba1,2, Christine Kapesa1, Evans Mpabalwani3,4, Lottie Hachaambwa5,6, Anthony Marius Smith7,8, Andrea Liezl Young7, David Gally9, Geoffrey Mainda10, Mercy Mukuma11, Mulemba Tillika Samutela12,13, Annie Kalonda2,12, James Mwansa14, John Bwalya Muma2.
Abstract
Objectives: This study investigated antimicrobial susceptibility and genomic profiling of S. enterica isolated from bloodstream infections at a tertiary referral hospital in Lusaka, Zambia, 2018-2019. Method: This was a prospective hospital-based study involving routine blood culture samples submitted to the microbiology laboratory at the University Teaching Hospital. Identification of S. enterica and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility profiles was achieved through conventional and automated methods. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted, and the sequence data outputs were processed for species identification, serotype determination, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) profile determination, identification of antimicrobial resistance determinants, and phylogeny.Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella enterica; Zambia; antimicrobial resistance; genetic diversity; serotype
Year: 2022 PMID: 35755477 PMCID: PMC9216281 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.04.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IJID Reg ISSN: 2772-7076
Demographics of patients with Salmonella enterica infections, serovar/serotype, and seasonal distribution
| Characteristics | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of isolates: 76Sequenced isolates: 64 | Total% ( | ||||||||
| Total | |||||||||
| Sequence types (ST) | ST1 (44) | ST313 (2) | ST11 (3) | ST85 (1) | – | ST15 (3) | ST365 (1) | – | |
| Gender | |||||||||
| Female: 43% (33/76) | 25 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 43% (33/76) |
| Male: 57% (43/76) | 33 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 57% (43/76) |
| Age | |||||||||
| 0–15 years | 37 (63%) | 1 (50%) | 5 (50%) | 0 | 1 (100%) | 2 (67%) | 1 (100%) | 3 (100%) | 61% (50/76) |
| 16–35years | 11 (23%) | 0 | 1 (25%) | 1 (100%) | 0 | 1 (33%) | 0 | 0 | 23% (14/76) |
| ≥ 36 years | 10 (14%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (25%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% (12/76) |
| Total ( | |||||||||
| Season | |||||||||
| Rainy | 29 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 58% (37/64) |
| Dry (cold) | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% (12/64) |
| Dry (hot) | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23% (15/64) |
| Total ( | |||||||||
Rainy season: November to April, Dry season (cold): May to August, Dry season (hot): September to October
Distribution of presumptive diagnosis for cases subjected to the microbiology laboratory for Salmonella enterica isolation (2018–2019)
| Presumptive diagnosis | Proportion | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|
| Enteric fever | 66.7% | 51.2–79.2 |
| Hepatitis | 4.4% | 1–16.9 |
| Sepsis | 17.8% | 8.9–32.4 |
| Sepsis in leukemia patients | 2.2% | 0.03–15.1 |
| Peritonitis | 2.2% | 0.03–15.1 |
| Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) | 4.4% | 1.1–15.1 |
| Disseminated TB | 2.2% | 0.03–15.1 |
Figure 1Resistance patterns to all antibiotics tested.
Abbreviations: AMP – ampicillin, CIP – ciprofloxacin, NA – nalidixic acid, CTX – cefotaxime, FEP – cefepime, CHL – chloramphenicol, SXT – trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, TE – tetracycline, IPM – imipenem
Antimicrobial susceptibility results (RIS proportion and 95% CI) and resistance genes
| Antibiotics class | Antibiotics | Susceptibility results | AMR resistance determinants | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance (R)% (95% CI) | Intermediate (I)% (95% CI) | Susceptible (S)% (95% CI) | |||
| Beta-lactams | AMP | 83 (72.2–90.3) | 1 (0.2–9.7) | 16 (8.7–26.1) | |
| Quinolones | CIP | 5 (2.1–14.4) | 30 (19.8–41.5) | 65 (52.8–75.2) | |
| NA | 20 (9.7–27.8) | – | 80 (72.2–90.3) | ||
| Third- and fourth- generation cephalosporins | CTX | 4 (1.3–12.6) | – | 96 (87.4–98.7) | None |
| FEB | 4 (1.3–12.6) | – | 96 (87.4–98.7) | ||
| Phenols | CHL | 49 (37.6–61.1) | – | 51 (39–62.4) | catA1 68% (26) |
| Folate pathway antagonist | SXT | 73 (61.5–82.4) | 10 (4.7–19.5) | 17 (9.7–27.8) | |
| Tetracycline | TE | 3 (0.7–10.9) | – | 97 (89.1–99.3) | None |
| Carbapenem | IPM | – | 3 (0.7–10.9) | 97 (89.1–99.3) | – |
Abbreviations: AMP – ampicillin, CIP – ciprofloxacin, NA – nalidixic acid, CTX – cefotaxime, FEP – cefepime, CHL – chloramphenicol, SXT – trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, TE – tetracycline, IPM – imipenem
Distribution of multidrug resistance (MDR) in the different Salmonella serovars (n = 76)
| Serovars | Multidrug resistant (MDR) | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of species (number of MDR isolates) | % MDR | |
| 7 (1) | 14% | |
| 3 (1) | 33% | |
| 1 (0) | 0 | |
| 58 (31) | 53% | |
| 2 (2) | 100% | |
| 1 (0) | 0 | |
| 3 (0) | 0 | |
| 1 (0) | 0 | |
| Total | ||
MDR – resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Figure 2Genetic relatedness of different Salmonella enterica serovars
Minimum spanning tree drawn using cgMLST data from S. enterica isolated from Lusaka, Zambia, 2018–2019. The circular nodes represent isolate(s) with identical cgMLST profiles; the more significant the node, the more isolates are reflected. The number of values between adjacent nodes indicates the number of allele differences between nodes (isolates). Even with ≤ 5 allele differences, there was a wide range of genetic diversity and varying strains.