| Literature DB >> 35754947 |
Osikemekha Anthony Anani1, Inobeme Abel2, John Ovie Olomukoro3, Ikenna Benedict Onyeachu2.
Abstract
Metal pollution of water and soil ecosystems has been linked to stress and/or toxicity in plants, thus affecting the quality and productivity of food crops. This condition has further aggravated the essential food demand caused by the increase in the human population. Reports from previous studies have shown that correcting the noxiousness due to metal stress tolerance, requires several modes of action in the systemic, tissue, cellular, physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels in food crops which might be apparent in terms of enhanced productivity. The possible targets of the toxicity impact of metals in food crops are the MG (methylglyoxal) and ROS (reactive oxygen species) which could result in damage to the DNA structure, enzymes inactivation, protein oxidation, and lipids' peroxidation. This current review evaluates insights into proteomics and metabolomics of metal chelation in food crops with special effects on the toxicity, tolerance, and partitioning of metals towards better health. Detailed information on the biochemical and physiological mechanisms of plant stress from metal induction and tolerance was highlighted. The specific information of various tolerance strategies of food crops under trace element toxicity, the function of metabolites, proteins, and food crop hormones in stress tolerance to heavy presences of metal contents in plants is discussed. Information on the partitioning of trace elements in food crops was enlisted. The health benefits and possible risks from the consumption of trace metals in food crops were evaluated followed by recommending the future research directions.Entities:
Keywords: Biofortification; Metabolomics; Metal transportation; Nutrient safety; Stress tolerance; Transcriptomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35754947 PMCID: PMC9208750 DOI: 10.1007/s42485-022-00090-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Proteins Proteom ISSN: 0975-8151
Plant responses to metal using various HSPs (heat shock proteins)
| S/N | Species of plants | Members of the HSPs | Methods for identification of proteins | Metals | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HSP17, HSP26.13p, HSP23p, HSP20, HSP21, and HSP17 | Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) Amplification, n-gel tryptic digestion and MALDI-TOF–MS analysis, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Gene Structure Display Server 2.0, chloroplast chromatin immunoprecipitation, and Flash Fluorescence Measurements | Cu, Cd, Ni, and Zn | Neumann et al. ( | |
| 2 | ClpB-C, HSP101, and HSP104 | sqRT-PCR (Semi-quantitative reverse transcription) analysis, and polymerase chain reaction, Tandem MS (Spectrometry), and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy | As, Co, and Cu | Sanchez et al. ( | |
| 3 | HSP81-1, HSP82, HDP81.2, HDP89.1, HDP88.1, HDP88.4, and HDP81.3 | Tandem liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, Stationary-phase YPDA (yeast peptone dextrose adenine) Cultures, Protein electrophoresis, and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel | Cd, As, Cr, Pb, and Cu | Sanchez et al. ( | |
| 4 | HSP60, Cpn60-B, and cpn60s | PCR (polymerase chain reaction) and agarose gel electrophoresis and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) | Zn, Fe, Cd, and Hg | Sarry et al. ( | |
| 5 | HSP68, BiP HSP70, and HSP70 | Feature extraction methods, salt/alkaline extraction method, and reverse transcriptions and total (T) RNA extraction | Ag, Zn, Cu, and Hg | Chakrabarty et al. ( |
Metabolic data involving antioxidant gene pathways and response in metal stress in food crops
| S/N | Plants source | Antioxidant genes and metabolic pathway(s) | Metabolic stress | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alkyl hydroperioxide reductase | It enhances plant tolerance against Cd and Cu by improving the scavenging of reactive sulphur and H2O2 species | Mishra et al. ( | |
| 2 | Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase | Acts as an antioxidant under Cd stress to therefore improves the plant tolerance to toxicity | Siripornadulsil et al. ( | |
| 3 | MT1 | Improves the tolerance of plants to Hg | Bellion et al. ( | |
| 4 | PCs and PCS1 | Improves the plant’s tolerances to Cu and Cd stress by the stimulation of phytochelatin | Li et al. ( | |
| 5 | Serine acetyltransferase | Improves the plant’s tolerance to As and Cd toxicity by the production of glutathione and phytochelatin metabolites | Guo et al. ( | |
| 6 | TcPCS1 and Serine acetyltransferase | Improves plant’s tolerance to Cd, Co, and Ni stress by enhancing the activities of CAT, POD, and SOD based on the enhancement of glutathione and reduced lipid peroxidation | Freeman et al. ( | |
| 7 | GR | It enhances plant’s tolerance the accumulation of Cd | Kim et al. ( | |
| 8 | CAT3 | It improves better roots and seedling growth under cd stress | Gichner et al. ( | |
| 9 | APC | Enhances plants’ tolerance to oxidative stress caused by As, Cd, and Cu | Lee et al. ( |
Fig. 1Possible molecular and biochemical mode of actions of toxic elemental metals induced damage and ROS to the growth and development of higher plants