| Literature DB >> 35753154 |
Divya Kanchibhotla1, Saumya Subramanian2, Reddy M Ravi Kumar3, K R Venkatesh Hari3, Monika Pathania4.
Abstract
Background: In the last two years, COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has created a mass destruction among humanity causing a major health crisis around the world. With the emergence of new strains of the virus, lack of targeted drugs and antimicrobial resistance, there is a dire need to discover specific antiviral with minimum side effects targeted against COVID-19. Objective: The present study evaluates the antiviral efficacy of a novel Ayurvedic polyherbal formulation, NOQ19, composed of a 13 well known herbs, in a cell-based setting. Methodology: Vero E6 (CL1008), the African green monkey kidney epithelial cell, were infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus (isolate USA-WA1/2020) in a 96 well-plate. NOQ19 test material was diluted at different concentration: 0.05 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml, 0.2 mg/ml, 0.3 mg/ml, 0.4 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, 0.6 mg/ml, 0.7 mg/ml, 0.8 mg/ml and 0.9 mg/ml. These different concentrations of NOQ19 were added to infected cells respectively and incubated for 3 days in 5% CO2 incubator. Remdesivir was used as a positive control. The cells were finally fixed with formaldehyde, stained with crystal violet and plaques were visualized. The number of plaques were counted to determine the PFU(plaque forming units)/ml.Entities:
Keywords: Ayurvedic; COVID-19; NOQ19; Polyherbal
Year: 2022 PMID: 35753154 PMCID: PMC9222090 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2022.100581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Ingredients of NOQ19
| S.No | Name of the herb | Part Used | Nature of herb | Quantity (mg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashwagandha | Root | Fine Powder | 30 | |
| 2 | Bilwa | Leaf | Fine Powder | 30 | |
| 3 | Yashtimadhu | Root | Fine Powder | 20 | |
| 4 | Rasna | Leaf | Fine Powder | 30 | |
| 5 | Vasaka | Leaf | Fine Powder | 25 | |
| 6 | Pippali | Fruit | Fine Powder | 30 | |
| 7 | Bhumiamla | Plant | Fine Powder | 35 | |
| 8 | Bhunimba | Whole plant | Fine Powder | 30 | |
| 9 | Saptaparna | Stem bark | Fine Powder | 30 | |
| 10 | Haridra | Rhizome | Fine Powder | 25 | |
| 11 | Patha | Root | Fine Powder | 25 | |
| 12 | Tulasi | Whole plant | Fine Powder | 20 | |
| 13 | Guduchi | Stem | Fine Powder | 20 | |
| 14 | Ashwagandha | Root | Aqueous Extract | 30 | |
| 15 | Yashtimadhu | Root | Aqueous Extract | 15 | |
| 16 | Vasaka | Leaf | Aqueous Extract | 25 | |
| 17 | Bhumiamla | Plant | Aqueous Extract | 30 | |
| 18 | Bhunimba | Whole plant | Aqueous Extract | 35 | |
| 19 | Guduchi | Stem | Aqueous Extract | 15 |
Viral load reduction among different concentrations of NOQ19.
| Sl. No. | Sample | Concentration | No. of Plaques | Dilution Factor | PFU/ml | Log PFU/ml | Log reductions of virus load | Percentage Reduction of virus load (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Average | ||||||||
| 1 | Virus only control | 22 | 19 | 20.5 | 1000 | 6,83,333 | 5.83 | |||
| 2 | Cell only | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 3 | Remdesivir | 25uM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1000 | 0 | NA | 100.00 | |
| (Positive control) | 12.5uM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1000 | 0 | NA | 100.00 | ||
| 4 | NOQ19 | 1 mg/ml | Cytotoxic | 1000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| 0.9 mg/ml | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1000 | 0 | NA | 100.00 | |||
| 0.8 mg/ml | 2 | 1 | 1.5 | 1000 | 50,000 | 4.7 | 1.14 | 92.68 | ||
| 0.7 mg/ml | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1000 | 100,000 | 5 | 0.83 | 85.37 | ||
| 0.6 mg/ml | 3 | 4 | 3.5 | 1000 | 166,667 | 5.07 | 0.77 | 82.93 | ||
| 0.5 mg/ml | 4 | 6 | 5 | 1000 | 166,667 | 5.22 | 0.61 | 75.61 | ||
| 0.4 mg/ml | 5 | 8 | 6.5 | 1000 | 266,667 | 5.34 | 0.50 | 68.29 | ||
| 0.3 mg/ml | 10 | 8 | 9 | 1000 | 300,000 | 5.48 | 0.36 | 56.10 | ||
Fig. 1IC50 efficacy of test material NOQ19.
Fig. 2IC50 efficacy of Remdesivir.