| Literature DB >> 35752773 |
Shuai Miao1,2, Wenjing Tang1, Heng Li3, Bozhi Li1, Chunxiao Yang1,4, Wei Xie1,2, Tao Wang1,2, Wenhao Bai1,2, Zihua Gong1,2, Zhao Dong1, Shengyuan Yu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gut microbial dysbiosis and gut-brain axis dysfunction have been implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine. However, it is unclear whether migraine-related cephalic allodynia could induce the alteration of gut microbial composition.Entities:
Keywords: 16 S rRNA gene sequencing; Cephalic allodynia; Gut microbiota; Gut-brain axis; Migraine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35752773 PMCID: PMC9233368 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01441-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Headache Pain ISSN: 1129-2369 Impact factor: 8.588
Fig. 1Flow chart of the experimental outline
Fig. 2Effects of repeated dural IS infusions on behavioral characteristics. A Comparisons of periorbital mechanical threshold among groups. B Comparisons of immobility time among groups. C Comparisons of the moving distance among groups. D Representative trajectory of each group on day 5. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared with the VEH group; ^P < 0.05, ^^P < 0.01, compared with the TO-VEH group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, compared with the TO-IS group)
Fig. 3Beta-diversity of gut microbiota at the OTU level. A PCoA plot between the VEH and IS groups. B ANOSIM plot between the VEH and IS groups. C PCoA plot between the VEH and TO-VEH groups. D ANOSIM plot between the VEH and TO-VEH groups. E PCoA plot among the VEH, IS and TO-IS groups. F ANOSIM plot among the VEH, IS and TO-IS groups. In PCoA plots, each symbol represents the data of an individual sample and an R-square value (range [0, 1]) shows a given grouping factor to determine the variation of distances (Adonis test, Euclidean distance, n = 6). In ANOSIM plots, the x-axis represents the different groups and the y-axis represents the distance rank of samples (ANOSIM test, Bray–Curtis distance, n = 6). An R-value (range [-1, 1]) greater than zero indicates that intergroup dissimilarities are greater than intragroup dissimilarities, while an R-value less than zero means that there are no intergroup differences
Fig. 4Microbial distributions at the phylum and family levels. A Community bar plot at the phylum level. B Relative abundance of the top 5 most abundant phyla. C Community bar plot at the family level. D Relative abundance of the top 15 most abundant families. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 6; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.05)
Fig. 5Analyses of the biomarker genus and differential pathways of carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism. A LEfSe analysis at the genus level. The bars represent the effect size (LDA score) of significantly discriminative genera. B Random forest analysis at the genus level. The y-axis displays the key genera ranked by their relative importance (MDA score) for classification. C Common biomarker genera in the LEfSe and RF analyses. D Relative abundances of the 5 biomarker genera. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 6; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) E Comparison of Tax4Fun2-predicted microbial functional pathways of carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism. The extended error bars plot shows differential metabolic pathways (Welch’s t-test, Benjamini–Hochberg FDR)
Levels of SCFAs in feces (mean ± SD)
| IS group | VEH group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AA (mg/g) | 0.48 ± 0.16 | 0.45 ± 0.15 | 0.74 |
| PA (mg/g) | 0.21 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.14 | 0.23 |
| IBA (ng/g) | 22.7 ± 10.1 | 17.7 ± 10.9 | 0.42 |
| BA (mg/g) | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.19 | 0.26 |
| IVA (ng/g) | 15.3 ± 4.64 | 11.8 ± 4.59 | 0.22 |
| VA (ng/g) | 28.3 ± 10.9 | 28.3 ± 20.4 | 0.99 |
| CA (ng/g) | 54.2 ± 75.6 | 39.3 ± 55.6 | 0.71 |
AA acetic acid, PA propionic acid, IBA isobutyric acid, BA butyric acid, IVA isovaleric acid, VA valeric acid, CA caproic acid
Levels of SCFAs in sera (mean ± SD)
| IS group | VEH group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AA (µg/mL) | 6.04 ± 8.11 | 4.73 ± 6.42 | 0.59 |
| PA (ng/mL) | 33.3 ± 17.7 | 34.0 ± 29.0 | 0.96 |
| IBA (ng/mL) | 15.9 ± 11.6 | 14.0 ± 8.05 | 0.94 |
| BA (µg/mL) | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.09 |
| IVA (ng/mL) | 24.6 ± 17.5 | 30.5 ± 11.6 | 0.39 |
| VA (ng/mL) | 1.95 ± 1.32 | 6.46 ± 8.07 | 0.21 |
| CA (ng/mL) | 40.3 ± 19.0 | 48.2 ± 37.6 | 0.66 |
Levels of tryptophan metabolite in feces (mean ± SD)
| IS group | VEH group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| L-TRP (µg/g) | 5.83 ± 2.36 | 7.77 ± 3.27 | 0.27 |
| 5-HT (µg/g) | 1.10 ± 0.79 | 0.62 ± 0.33 | 0.21 |
| NAS (µg/g) | 0.13 ± 0.13 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.55 |
| 5-HIAA (µg/g) | 0.32 ± 0.20 | 0.32 ± 0.14 | 0.99 |
| L-KYN (ng/g) | 34.1 ± 12.5 | 40.3 ± 19.5 | 0.53 |
| KYNA (µg/g) | 0.50 ± 0.71 | 0.24 ± 0.21 | 0.09 |
| XA (µg/g) | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.10 | 0.09 |
| PiA (µg/g) | 3.82 ± 2.72 | 4.36 ± 3.21 | 0.76 |
| IAM (ng/g) | 32.5 ± 8.83 | 12.8 ± 2.07 | 0.02* |
| IAA (µg/g) | 0.81 ± 0.48 | 1.19 ± 0.98 | 0.42 |
| IAld (µg/g) | 0.29 ± 0.12 | 0.38 ± 0.16 | 0.33 |
| TRM (µg/g) | 0.81 ± 0.43 | 1.16 ± 0.38 | 0.17 |
| IEt (µg/g) | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.03* |
| ILA (ng/g) | 24.2 ± 17.8 | 39.5 ± 53.2 | 0.70 |
| IA (ng/g) | 32.4 ± 15.1 | 29.9 ± 8.63 | 0.73 |
| IPA (µg/g) | 0.54 ± 0.37 | 0.60 ± 0.28 | 0.75 |
L-TRP L-tryptophan, 5-HT serotonin, NAS N-acetylserotonin, 5-HIAA 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, L-KYN L-kynurenine, KYNA kynurenic acid, XA xanthurenic acid, PiA picolinic acid, IAM indole-3-acetamide, IAA β-indole-3-acetic acid, IAld indole-3-aldehyde, TRM tryptamine, IEt tryptophol (indoleethanol), ILA indole-3-lactic acid, IA indole-3-β-acrylic acid, IPA indole-3-propionic acid
Levels of tryptophan metabolites in sera (mean ± SD)
| IS group | VEH group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| L-TRP (µg/mL) | 8.89 ± 1.45 | 9.09 ± 2.13 | 0.85 |
| 5-HT (µg/mL) | 2.01 ± 0.32 | 1.79 ± 0.19 | 0.19 |
| NAS (ng/mL) | 1.05 ± 0.42 | 0.89 ± 0.58 | 0.59 |
| 5-HIAA (ng/mL) | 16.8 ± 5.21 | 13.2 ± 7.59 | 0.36 |
| L-KYN (µg/mL) | 0.50 ± 0.15 | 0.49 ± 0.14 | 0.96 |
| KYNA (ng/mL) | 9.86 ± 11.1 | 15.3 ± 14.8 | 1.00 |
| XA (ng/mL) | 26.1 ± 4.64 | 29.0 ± 12.6 | 0.62 |
| IAA (µg/mL) | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.58 |
| IAld (ng/mL) | 1.08 ± 0.70 | 1.28 ± 0.57 | 0.39 |
| IEt (ng/mL) | 1.18 ± 1.67 | 1.10 ± 0.95 | 0.45 |
| ILA (ng/mL) | 29.5 ± 5.12 | 31.9 ± 7.71 | 0.54 |
| IA (ng/mL) | 30.6 ± 19.4 | 38.5 ± 13.9 | 0.44 |
| IPA (µg/mL) | 0.42 ± 0.26 | 0.82 ± 0.56 | 0.15 |
Levels of PiA, IAM and TRM could not be detected in sera