Literature DB >> 30165629

Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: results from the PROspective multicenter registry on radiaTion dose Estimates of cardiac CT angIOgraphy iN daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI).

Thomas J Stocker1,2, Simon Deseive1,2, Jonathon Leipsic3, Martin Hadamitzky4, Marcus Y Chen5, Ronen Rubinshtein6, Mathias Heckner1, Jeroen J Bax7, Xiang-Ming Fang8, Erik Lerkevang Grove9, John Lesser10, Pál Maurovich-Horvat11, James Otton12, Sanghoon Shin13, Gianluca Pontone14, Hugo Marques15, Benjamin Chow16, Cesar H Nomura17, Ramzi Tabbalat18, Axel Schmermund19, Joon-Won Kang20, Christopher Naoum21, Melany Atkins22, Eugenio Martuscelli23, Steffen Massberg1,2, Jörg Hausleiter1,2.   

Abstract

Aims: Advances of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) have been developed for dose reduction, but their efficacy in clinical practice is largely unknown. This study was designed to evaluate radiation dose exposure and utilization of dose-saving strategies for contrast-enhanced cardiac CTA in daily practice. Methods and results: Sixty one hospitals from 32 countries prospectively enrolled 4502 patients undergoing cardiac CTA during one calendar month in 2017. Computed tomography angiography scan data and images were analysed in a central core lab and compared with a similar dose survey performed in 2007. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors associated with dose. The most frequent indication for cardiac CTA was the evaluation of coronary artery disease in 89% of patients. The median dose-length product (DLP) of coronary CTA was 195 mGy*cm (interquartile range 110-338 mGy*cm). When compared with 2007, the DLP was reduced by 78% (P < 0.001) without an increase in non-diagnostic coronary CTAs (1.7% in 2007 vs. 1.9% in 2017 surveys, P = 0.55). A 37-fold variability in median DLP was observed between the hospitals with lowest and highest DLP (range of median DLP 57-2090 mGy*cm). Independent predictors for radiation dose of coronary CTA were: body weight, heart rate, sinus rhythm, tube voltage, iterative image reconstruction, and the selection of scan protocols.
Conclusion: This large international radiation dose survey demonstrates considerable reduction of radiation exposure in coronary CTA during the last decade. However, the large inter-site variability in radiation exposure underlines the need for further site-specific training and adaptation of contemporary cardiac scan protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30165629      PMCID: PMC6455904          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  27 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac computed tomography--evidence, limitations and clinical application.

Authors:  Christian R Hamilton-Craig; Daniel Friedman; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 2.975

2.  Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja S Meyer; Eugenio Martuscelli; Pietro Spagnolo; Hiroaki Yamamoto; Patricia Carrascosa; Thomas Anger; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Hatem Alkadhi; Stefan Martinoff; Martin Hadamitzky; Franziska Hein; Bernhard Bischoff; Miriam Kuse; Albert Schömig; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05

3.  A prospective national survey of coronary CT angiography radiation doses in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Isabel A Castellano; Edward D Nicol; Russell K Bull; Carl A Roobottom; Michelle C Williams; Stephen P Harden
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2017-05-08

4.  Cardiac-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Radiation Effective Dose From Dose-Length Product in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Sandra Halliburton; Carla M Thompson; Yanping Xu; Anjali Chelliah; Sachin R Jambawalikar; Boyu Peng; M Robert Peters; Jill E Jacobs; Munir Ghesani; James J Jang; Hussein Al-Khalidi; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08-16

5.  2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging: Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways.

Authors:  John W Hirshfeld; Victor A Ferrari; Frank M Bengel; Lisa Bergersen; Charles E Chambers; Andrew J Einstein; Mark J Eisenberg; Mark A Fogel; Thomas C Gerber; David E Haines; Warren K Laskey; Marian C Limacher; Kenneth J Nichols; Daniel A Pryma; Gilbert L Raff; Geoffrey D Rubin; Donnette Smith; Arthur E Stillman; Suma A Thomas; Thomas T Tsai; Louis K Wagner; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Prospective Randomized Trial on Radiation Dose Estimates of CT Angiography Applying Iterative Image Reconstruction: The PROTECTION V Study.

Authors:  Simon Deseive; Marcus Y Chen; Grigorios Korosoglou; Jonathon Leipsic; Eugenio Martuscelli; Patricia Carrascosa; Saeed Mirsadraee; Charles White; Martin Hadamitzky; Stefan Martinoff; Anna-Leonie Menges; Bernhard Bischoff; Steffen Massberg; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-15

7.  Rationale and design of the worldwide prospective multicenter registry on radiation dose estimates of cardiac CT angiography in daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI).

Authors:  Thomas J Stocker; Simon Deseive; Marcus Chen; Jonathon Leipsic; Martin Hadamitzky; Ronen Rubinshtein; Erik L Grove; Xiang-Ming Fang; John Lesser; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Hugo Marques; Daniele Andreini; Ramzi Tabbalat; Joon-Won Kang; Joachim Eckert; Patricia Dickson; Signe H Forsdahl; Jess Lambrechtsen; Roberto C Cury; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2017-12-05

8.  Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques.

Authors:  Gilbert L Raff; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; David A Share; Tauqir Y Goraya; Ella A Kazerooni; Mauro Moscucci; Ralph E Gentry; Aiden Abidov
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: results from the 65 country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS).

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Thomas N B Pascual; Mathew Mercuri; Ganesan Karthikeyan; João V Vitola; John J Mahmarian; Nathan Better; Salah E Bouyoucef; Henry Hee-Seung Bom; Vikram Lele; V Peter C Magboo; Erick Alexánderson; Adel H Allam; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Albert Flotats; Scott Jerome; Philipp A Kaufmann; Osnat Luxenburg; Leslee J Shaw; S Richard Underwood; Madan M Rehani; Ravi Kashyap; Diana Paez; Maurizio Dondi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Guide Management of Patients With Coronary Disease.

Authors:  Michelle C Williams; Amanda Hunter; Anoop S V Shah; Valentina Assi; Stephanie Lewis; Joel Smith; Colin Berry; Nicholas A Boon; Elizabeth Clark; Marcus Flather; John Forbes; Scott McLean; Giles Roditi; Edwin J R van Beek; Adam D Timmis; David E Newby
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Role of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Lipid-Lowering Therapy: a Bridge to Image-Guided Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Toru Miyoshi; Kazuhiro Osawa; Keishi Ichikawa; Kazuki Suruga; Takashi Miki; Masashi Yoshida; Koji Nakagawa; Hironobu Toda; Kazufumi Nakamura; Hiroshi Morita; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Cardiovascular CT: the role of cardiologists.

Authors:  Muhummad Sohaib Nazir; Edward D Nicol
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Medical Radiation Exposure to the U.S. Population: The Turning Tide.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Clinical applications of cardiac computed tomography: a consensus paper of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging-part I.

Authors:  Gianluca Pontone; Alexia Rossi; Marco Guglielmo; Marc R Dweck; Oliver Gaemperli; Koen Nieman; Francesca Pugliese; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Alessia Gimelli; Bernard Cosyns; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  [Morphological and functional diagnostics of coronary artery disease by computed tomography].

Authors:  S Baumann; D Overhoff; C Tesche; G Korosoglou; S Kelle; M Nassar; S J Buss; F Andre; M Renker; U J Schoepf; I Akin; S Waldeck; S O Schoenberg; D Lossnitzer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 6.  Cardiac CT: why, when, and how : Update 2019.

Authors:  Anke Busse; Daniel Cantré; Ebba Beller; Felix Streckenbach; Alper Öner; Hüseyin Ince; Marc-André Weber; Felix G Meinel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  What Is the Power of Nonzero?

Authors:  Quynh A Truong
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2019-10-31

8.  Combining perfusion and angiography with a low-dose cardiac CT technique: a preliminary investigation in a swine model.

Authors:  Logan Hubbard; Shant Malkasian; Yixiao Zhao; Pablo Abbona; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography From Clinical Uses to Emerging Technologies: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Khaled M Abdelrahman; Marcus Y Chen; Amit K Dey; Renu Virmani; Aloke V Finn; Ramzi Y Khamis; Andrew D Choi; James K Min; Michelle C Williams; Andrew J Buckler; Charles A Taylor; Campbell Rogers; Habib Samady; Charalambos Antoniades; Leslee J Shaw; Matthew J Budoff; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein; Jagat Narula; Nehal N Mehta
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Expert opinion paper on cardiac imaging after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Renate B Schnabel; Stephan Camen; Fabian Knebel; Andreas Hagendorff; Udo Bavendiek; Michael Böhm; Wolfram Doehner; Matthias Endres; Klaus Gröschel; Andreas Goette; Hagen B Huttner; Christoph Jensen; Paulus Kirchhof; Grigorios Korosoglou; Ulrich Laufs; Jan Liman; Caroline Morbach; Darius Günther Nabavi; Tobias Neumann-Haefelin; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Sven Poli; Timolaos Rizos; Andreas Rolf; Joachim Röther; Wolf Rüdiger Schäbitz; Thorsten Steiner; Götz Thomalla; Rolf Wachter; Karl Georg Haeusler
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.