Literature DB >> 35751769

Generalization to Novel Consonants: Place Versus Voice.

Sara Finley1.   

Abstract

In traditional, generative phonology, sound patterns are represented in terms of abstract features, typically based on the articulatory properties of the sounds. The present study makes use of an artificial language learning experiment to explore when and how learners extend a novel phonological pattern to novel segments. Adult, English-speaking learners were exposed to a spirantization pattern in which a stop became a fricative between two vowels (e.g., /bib/ + /o/ ➔ [bivo]). Participants were trained on spirantization for two of four possible stop-fricative pairs, and were tested on their generalization to the held-out segments. Two groups of participants were trained on items based on voicing (e.g., the Voiced condition was trained on /b/ ➔ [v], and /d/ ➔ [z], and tested on /p/ ➔ [f], and /t/ ➔ [s]), and two groups of participants were trained on items based on place of articulation (e.g., the Labial condition was trained on /b/ ➔ [v], and /p/ ➔ [f] and tested on /t/ ➔ [s], and /d/ ➔ [z]). Participants in both Place and Voice conditions were successful at learning and generalizing the spirantization pattern to novel segments, but rates of generalization were higher in the Voice conditions. These results support a similarity-based approach to generalization, particularly one that takes into account articulatorily-based features and natural classes. Implications for phonological theory are discussed.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial language learning; Generalization; Phonological features; Phonology

Year:  2022        PMID: 35751769     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-022-09897-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  13 in total

1.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Analysis of English nonsense syllable recognition in noise.

Authors:  José R Benkí
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Learning biases predict a word order universal.

Authors:  Jennifer Culbertson; Paul Smolensky; Géraldine Legendre
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-12-28

4.  Learning metathesis: Evidence for syllable structure constraints.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  The learnability of abstract syntactic principles.

Authors:  Amy Perfors; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Terry Regier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-24

6.  A Bayesian model of biases in artificial language learning: the case of a word-order universal.

Authors:  Jennifer Culbertson; Paul Smolensky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-09-10

7.  Putting old tools to novel uses: The role of form accessibility in semantic extension.

Authors:  Zara Harmon; Vsevolod Kapatsinski
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech.

Authors:  R A Cole; J Jakimik; W E Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Learning diphone-based segmentation.

Authors:  Robert Daland; Janet B Pierrehumbert
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-12-09

10.  Phonological Concept Learning.

Authors:  Elliott Moreton; Joe Pater; Katya Pertsova
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.