Literature DB >> 35751716

Cognitive Flexibility and Impulsivity Deficits in Suicidal Adolescents.

Heather A MacPherson1, Kerri L Kim2,3, Karen E Seymour4, Jennifer Wolff2,5, Christianne Esposito-Smythers6, Anthony Spirito2, Daniel P Dickstein7.   

Abstract

Although neurocognitive deficits have been documented in adolescents with suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SA), it is unclear whether certain impairments differentiate these groups, potentially suggesting heightened risk for SA. Focus on specific facets of impulsivity and cognitive control may indicate distinctions between adolescents with SA vs. SI. The current study examined dimensions of impulsivity and cognitive control in 141 adolescents with SA (n = 41) vs. SI without SA (n = 49) vs. typically-developing controls (TDCs; n = 51). Adolescents completed cross-sectional neurocognitive tasks via the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery, in addition to demographic and clinical measures. Analyses involved ANOVAs and ANCOVAs. Results indicated that adolescents with SA demonstrated less set shifting/cognitive flexibility (reduced ability to adapt to/disengage from stimuli) and greater impulsive decision making (reduced ability to collect/evaluate information before making decisions) compared to TDCs. In addition, both TDCs and adolescents with SA had greater response inhibition (increased ability to stop motor responses that have begun/become prepotent) than those with SI. Similar results were found when analyzing female adolescents separately. There were no significant differences for male adolescents, potentially due to the small subsample (n = 40). There were no significant findings for spatial planning/problem solving or visuospatial working memory. Findings suggest: 1) less set shifting/cognitive flexibility and greater impulsive decision making for adolescents with SA vs. TDCs; and 2) greater response inhibition for TDCs and adolescents with SA vs. SI. Such information may be useful for improving risk assessments (adding neurocognitive tasks) and targeted treatments (incorporating cognitive remediation) for this impaired population.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Cognitive flexibility; Impulsive decision making; Response inhibition; Suicidal ideation; Suicide attempt

Year:  2022        PMID: 35751716     DOI: 10.1007/s10802-022-00952-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol        ISSN: 2730-7166


  40 in total

Review 1.  Adolescent suicide and suicidal behavior.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Bridge; Tina R Goldstein; David A Brent
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 2.  Suicide as escape from self.

Authors:  R F Baumeister
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Impaired decision making in adolescent suicide attempters.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Bridge; Sandra M McBee-Strayer; Elizabeth A Cannon; Arielle H Sheftall; Brady Reynolds; John V Campo; Kathleen A Pajer; Rémy P Barbe; David A Brent
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  Risk-sensitive decision-making deficit in adolescent suicide attempters.

Authors:  John P Ackerman; Sandy M McBee-Strayer; Kristen Mendoza; Jack Stevens; Arielle H Sheftall; John V Campo; Jeffrey A Bridge
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.576

5.  Pubertal Development, Emotion Regulatory Styles, and the Emergence of Sex Differences in Internalizing Disorders and Symptoms in Adolescence.

Authors:  Lauren B Alloy; Jessica L Hamilton; Elissa J Hamlat; Lyn Y Abramson
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-09-25

6.  Cognitive flexibility and performance in children and adolescents with threshold and sub-threshold bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Daniel P Dickstein; David Axelson; Alexandra B Weissman; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey I Hunt; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Fangzi Liao; Mary Kay Gill; Heather Hower; Thomas W Frazier; Rasim S Diler; Eric A Youngstrom; Mary A Fristad; L Eugene Arnold; Robert L Findling; Sarah M Horwitz; Robert A Kowatch; Neal D Ryan; Michael Strober; Boris Birmaher; Martin B Keller
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 7.  Cognitive remediation: potential novel brain-based treatment for bipolar disorder in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Daniel P Dickstein; Grace K Cushman; Kerri L Kim; Alexandra B Weissman; Ezra Wegbreit
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.790

8.  Lethal forethought: delayed reward discounting differentiates high- and low-lethality suicide attempts in old age.

Authors:  Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Katalin Szanto; Greg J Siegle; Meredith L Wallace; Steven D Forman; Barbara Sahakian; Charles F Reynolds; Luke Clark
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Impulsivity and clinical symptoms among adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury with or without attempted suicide.

Authors:  Donald M Dougherty; Charles W Mathias; Dawn M Marsh-Richard; Kristen N Prevette; Michael A Dawes; Erin S Hatzis; Guy Palmes; Sylvain O Nouvion
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  Neuropsychological performance in pediatric bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Daniel P Dickstein; Julia E Treland; Joseph Snow; Erin B McClure; Mona S Mehta; Kenneth E Towbin; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.