Literature DB >> 35750930

Predicting Shunt Dependency from the Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Ventricular Size.

Clio Rubinos1,2, Soon Bin Kwon2,3, Murad Megjhani2,3, Kalijah Terilli2,3, Brenda Wong4, Lizbeth Cespedes4, Jenna Ford2, Renz Reyes4, Hannah Kirsch2, Ayham Alkhachroum2, Angela Velazquez2, David Roh2,4, Sachin Agarwal2,4, Jan Claassen2,4, E Sander Connolly4,5, Soojin Park6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolonged external ventricular drainage (EVD) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) leads to morbidity, whereas early removal can have untoward effects related to recurrent hydrocephalus. A metric to help determine the optimal time for EVD removal or ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement would be beneficial in preventing the prolonged, unnecessary use of EVD. This study aimed to identify whether dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biometrics can temporally predict VPS dependency after SAH.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective, single-center, observational study of patients with aneurysmal SAH who required EVD placement for hydrocephalus. Patients were divided into VPS-dependent (VPS+) and non-VPS dependent groups. We measured the bicaudate index (BCI) on all available computed tomography scans and calculated the change over time (ΔBCI). We analyzed the relationship of ΔBCI with CSF output by using Pearson's correlation. A k-nearest neighbor model of the relationship between ΔBCI and CSF output was computed to classify VPS.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. CSF output was significantly higher in the VPS+ group in the 7 days post EVD placement. There was a negative correlation between delta BCI and CSF output in the VPS+ group (negative delta BCI means ventricles become smaller) and a positive correlation in the VPS- group starting from days four to six after EVD placement (p < 0.05). A weighted k-nearest neighbor model for classification had a sensitivity of 0.75, a specificity of 0.70, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80.
CONCLUSIONS: The correlation of ΔBCI and CSF output is a reliable intraindividual biometric for VPS dependency after SAH as early as days four to six after EVD placement. Our machine learning model leverages this relationship between ΔBCI and cumulative CSF output to predict VPS dependency. Early knowledge of VPS dependency could be studied to reduce EVD duration in many centers (intensive care unit length of stay).
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral spinal fluid dynamics; External ventricular drain; Hydrocephalus; Machine learning; Shunt dependency; Subarachnoid

Year:  2022        PMID: 35750930     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-022-01538-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.532


  36 in total

1.  Clipping or coiling of ruptured cerebral aneurysms and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Panayiotis Varelas; Ann Helms; Grant Sinson; Marianna Spanaki; Lotfi Hacein-Bey
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Risk of Shunting After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Collaborative Study and Initiation of a Consortium.

Authors:  Hadie Adams; Vin Shen Ban; Ville Leinonen; Salah G Aoun; Jukka Huttunen; Taavi Saavalainen; Antti Lindgren; Juhana Frosen; Mikael Fraunberg; Timo Koivisto; Juha Hernesniemi; Babu G Welch; Juha E Jaaskelainen; Terhi J Huttunen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Factors associated with hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  J P Sheehan; R S Polin; J M Sheehan; M K Baskaya; N F Kassell
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Predictors of long-term shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clinical article.

Authors:  Fred Rincon; Errol Gordon; Robert M Starke; Manuel M Buitrago; Andres Fernandez; J Michael Schmidt; Jan Claassen; Katja E Wartenberg; Jennifer Frontera; David B Seder; David Palestrant; E Sander Connolly; Kiwon Lee; Stephan A Mayer; Neeraj Badjatia
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Acute hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  T H Milhorat
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Prediction of ventriculoperitoneal shunt dependency in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Michael Chan; Ali Alaraj; Mateo Calderon; Sebastian Ramon Herrera; Weihua Gao; Sean Ruland; Ben Zion Roitberg
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Cognitive deficits in the acute stage after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  B O Hütter; I Kreitschmann-Andermahr; J M Gilsbach
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Ventriculoperitoneal shunting after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: analysis of the indications, complications, and outcome with a focus on patients with borderline ventriculomegaly.

Authors:  Andrew S Little; Joseph M Zabramski; Madelon Peterson; Pamela W Goslar; Scott D Wait; Felipe C Albuquerque; Cameron G McDougall; Robert F Spetzler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: incidence, predictors, and revision rates. Clinical article.

Authors:  Cian J O'Kelly; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Peter C Austin; David Urbach; M Christopher Wallace
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Quantitative Modeling of External Ventricular Drain Output to Predict Shunt Dependency in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Cohort Study.

Authors:  A Perry; C S Graffeo; G Kleinstern; L P Carlstrom; M J Link; A A Rabinstein
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.210

View more
  1 in total

1.  Navigating the Ocean of Big Data in Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Rajat Dhar; Geert Meyfroidt
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.