Literature DB >> 16757827

Clipping or coiling of ruptured cerebral aneurysms and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus.

Panayiotis Varelas1, Ann Helms, Grant Sinson, Marianna Spanaki, Lotfi Hacein-Bey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hydrocephalus may develop either early in the course of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or after the first 2 weeks. Because the amount of SAH is a predictor of hydrocephalus, the two available aneurysmal treatments, clipping or coiling, may lead to differences in the need for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion, as only surgery permits clot removal.
METHODS: Hospital and University Hospitals Consortium (UHC) databases were used to retrieve data on all patients admitted to our hospital with aneurysmal SAH during the last 4 years. The incidence of permanent ventricular shunt (VS) according to treatment modality used was evaluated.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-eight patients were admitted with aneurysmal SAH. Coiling was performed on 48 (26%) and clipping on 135 (73.8%) patients. Fifty-six (31%) patients required CSF diversion. External ventricular drain was placed in 30 (22.2%) clipped and 13 (27.1%) coiled patients ( p = 0.5 ), and VS in 6 patients of the two treatment groups (4.4 versus 12.5%, respectively; p = 0.08). Patients requiring VS had longer UHC-expected hospital length of stay (LOS), as well as observed ICU and hospital LOS, compared to patients with temporary or no CSF diversion (24 +/- 14 versus 15 +/- 8, 20.5 +/- 9 versus 11 +/- 7, and 30 +/- 13 versus 16 +/- 11 days, respectively; p <or= 0.01). In a logistic regression model, VS was independently associated with rebleeding, external ventricular drain placement, coiling, and UHC-expected LOS (odds ratios, 95% confidence interval 12.1, 2.3 - 62.6, 6.9, 1.6 - 30, 6.25, 1.3 - 29, and 1.1, 1.02 - 1.14, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients admitted with aneurysmal SAH require temporary or permanent CSF diversion. Permanent shunting was found to be associated with coiling in our patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16757827     DOI: 10.1385/NCC:4:3:223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  24 in total

1.  Hydrocephalus: comparison of clipping and embolization in aneurysm treatment.

Authors:  H Sethi; A Moore; J Dervin; A Clifton; J E MacSweeney
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 2: Surgical results.

Authors:  N F Kassell; J C Torner; J A Jane; E C Haley; H P Adams
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Factors associated with hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  J P Sheehan; R S Polin; J M Sheehan; M K Baskaya; N F Kassell
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  W E Hunt; R M Hess
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Influence of aneurysm location on the development of chronic hydrocephalus following SAH.

Authors:  T A Pietilä; K C Heimberger; H Palleske; M Brock
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; F Viñuela; J Dion; G Duckwiler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Acute hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  V Mehta; R O Holness; K Connolly; S Walling; R Hall
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Chronic shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after early surgical and early endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  A Gruber; A Reinprecht; G Bavinzski; T Czech; B Richling
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Microsurgical fenestration of the lamina terminalis reduces the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ricardo J Komotar; Alessandro Olivi; Daniele Rigamonti; Rafael J Tamargo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Predictive factors for deterioration from hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  F H Vermeij; D Hasan; M Vermeulen; H L Tanghe; J van Gijn
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  11 in total

1.  Risk of Shunt Dependent Hydrocephalus after Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms : Surgical Clipping versus Endovascular Coiling According to Fisher Grading System.

Authors:  Kyung-Hun Nam; In-Suk Hamm; Dong-Hun Kang; Jaechan Park; Yong-Sun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-10-30

2.  The role of lumbar drainage to prevent shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after coil embolization for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in good-grade patients.

Authors:  Cho In Yong; Sung-Kyun Hwang; Sung-Hak Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-12-31

3.  Predicting Shunt Dependency from the Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Ventricular Size.

Authors:  Clio Rubinos; Soon Bin Kwon; Murad Megjhani; Kalijah Terilli; Brenda Wong; Lizbeth Cespedes; Jenna Ford; Renz Reyes; Hannah Kirsch; Ayham Alkhachroum; Angela Velazquez; David Roh; Sachin Agarwal; Jan Claassen; E Sander Connolly; Soojin Park
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.532

Review 4.  [Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Significance and complications].

Authors:  A S Sarrafzadeh; U Kaisers; W Boemke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Perioperative use of recombinant factor VII to prevent intraoperative aneurysm rupture in high risk patients: a preliminary safety evaluation.

Authors:  Eric S Nussbaum; Tariq M Janjua; Archie Defillo; Penny Sinner; Andrea Zelensky
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 6.  [Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage].

Authors:  P Kellner; D Stoevesandt; J Soukup; M Bucher; C Raspé
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Comparison of Incidence and Risk Factors for Shunt-dependent Hydrocephalus in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients.

Authors:  In-Seok Bae; Hyeong-Joong Yi; Kyu-Sun Choi; Hyoung-Joon Chun
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2014-06-30

Review 8.  Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Won-Sang Cho; Jeong Eun Kim; Sukh Que Park; Jun Kyeung Ko; Dae-Won Kim; Jung Cheol Park; Je Young Yeon; Seung Young Chung; Joonho Chung; Sung-Pil Joo; Gyojun Hwang; Deog Young Kim; Won Hyuk Chang; Kyu-Sun Choi; Sung Ho Lee; Seung Hun Sheen; Hyun-Seung Kang; Byung Moon Kim; Hee-Joon Bae; Chang Wan Oh; Hyeon Seon Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-02-28

9.  Predictors of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study in a single Egyptian institute.

Authors:  Hashem M Aboul-Ela; Ahmed M Salah El-Din; Ahmed A Zaater; Mohamed Shehab; Ossama A El Shahawy
Journal:  Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 10.  The Pathogenesis of Hydrocephalus Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Lu-Ting Kuo; Abel Po-Hao Huang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.