| Literature DB >> 35749564 |
Xuan Zhou1, Hui Sun2, Jussi Heinonsalo3, Jukka Pumpanen1, Frank Berninger1.
Abstract
Microbial communities often possess enormous diversity, raising questions about whether this diversity drives ecosystem functioning, especially the influence of diversity on soil decomposition and respiration. Although functional redundancy is widely observed in soil microorganisms, evidence that species occupy distinct metabolic niches has also emerged. In this paper, we found that apart from the environmental variables, increases in microbial diversity, notably bacterial diversity, lead to an increase in soil C emissions. This was demonstrated using structural equation modelling (SEM), linking soil respiration with naturally differing levels of soil physio-chemical properties, vegetation coverage, and microbial diversity after fire disturbance. Our SEMs also revealed that models including bacterial diversity explained more variation of soil CO2 emissions (about 45%) than fungal diversity (about 38%). A possible explanation of this discrepancy is that fungi are more multifunctional than bacteria and, therefore, an increase in fungal diversity does not necessarily change soil respiration. Further analysis on functional gene structure suggested that bacterial and fungal diversities mainly explain the potential decomposition of recalcitrant C compare with that of labile C. Overall, by incorporating microbial diversity and the environmental variables, the predictive power of models on soil C emission was significantly improved, indicating microbial diversity is crucial for predicting ecosystem functions.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial diversity; fungal diversity; microbial community composition; microbial functional genes; soil carbon emission; structural equation modelling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35749564 PMCID: PMC9303362 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiac074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol ISSN: 0168-6496 Impact factor: 4.519
The 25 percentage and 75 percentage quantiles of the predictors involved in the structural equation modelling and the correlation test.
| Variables | Abbreviation | Model | Depth | Fire3 | Fire25 | Fire46 | Fire100 | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micro-climate (latent variable) | Temp (oC) | SEM1-4 | 5 cm | 5.8–8.4 | 7.1–7.1 | 6.8–11.3 | 6.1–8.0 | Köster et al. ( |
| 10 cm | 4.4–5.9 | 4.5–6.1 | 4.1–6.1 | 2.0–3.3 | ||||
| Activ.layer.depth (m) | 0.78–1.48 | 0.53–1.32 | 0.53–0.80 | 0.26–0.32 | ||||
| AvMoi (%) | SEM1-4 | 5 cm | 33.1–40.7 | 30.0–42.0 | 41.6–51.1 | 45.7–66.2 | ||
| 10 cm | 33.1–43.9 | 38.5–50.7 | 41.4–51.1 | 38.7–64.6 | ||||
| Soil organic matter | SOM (g g–1) | SEM1-4 | 5 cm | 0.16–0.91 | 0.13–0.47 | 0.13–0.77 | 0.84–1.00 | |
| 10 cm | 0.04–0.09 | 0.07–0.23 | 0.11–0.36 | 0.50–0.90 | ||||
| Root content | Roots (g g–1) | SEM1-4 | 5 cm | 0.02–0.07 | 0.05–0.11 | 0.16–0.37 | 0.10–0.13 | Aaltonen et al. ( |
| 10 cm | 0.002–0.003 | 0.02–0.05 | 0.06–0.11 | 0.02–0.07 | ||||
| Dissolved organic C | DOC (mg g–1) | SEM1-4 | 5 cm | 0.88–3.26 | 0.66–2.11 | 1.73–6.06 | 4.78–15.15 | Zhou et al. ( |
| 10 cm | 0.26–0.34 | 0.33–1.08 | 0.52–0.91 | 1.16–2.64 | ||||
| Microbial biomass | MB (mg g–1) | SEM1-4 | 5 cm | 0.8–5.3 | 1.26–4.8 | 1.0–8.8 | 5.7–14.5 | |
| 10 cm | 0.09–0.15 | 0.45–3–62 | 0.67–1.87 | 2.69–4.10 | ||||
| Microbial diversity (latent variable) | HBact | SEM1,3 | 5 cm | 5.22–5.46 | 5.38–5.48 | 5.50–5.78 | 4.94–5.40 | Zhou et al. ( |
| 10 cm | 5.45–5.62 | 5.13–5.57 | 5.73–5.85 | 5.17–5.75 | ||||
| HFungi | SEM1,4 | 5 cm | 3.08–3.67 | 2.66–3.07 | 3.09–3.23 | 2.61–3.28 | ||
| 10 cm | 2.72–3.42 | 2.74–3.18 | 3.29–3.59 | 2.56–3.39 | ||||
| Soil repsiration | CO2 (mg CO2 s–1m–2) | SEM1-4 | 0.10–0.19 | 0.15–0.39 | 0.40–0.54 | 0.22–0.39 | Köster et al.( | |
| Microbial heterotrphic respiration | CO2 emission (incubation at 19 °C) (mg CO2 gC–1h–1) | Correlat-ion test | 5 cm | 0.09–0.18 | 0.08–0.23 | 0.05–0.12 | 0.17–0.75 | Aaltonen et al. ( |
| 10 cm | 0.03–0.09 | 0.03–0.11 | 0.003–0.02 | 0.09–0.15 | ||||
| 30 cm | 0.016–0.021 | 0.016–0.047 | 0.001–0.002 | 0.025–0.029 |
Figure 1.Prediction of soil CO2 fluxes along forest succession after a fire using paths with microbial diversity (A) and without microbial diversity(B). Blue solid lines represent positive correlations and red lines are negative correlations, whereas the grey lines show the paths that are not significant. The standardized coefficients for indicating the strength of the effects are presented on the significant paths with blue (positive) and red (negative) numbers. Significant levels are as follows: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. The r2 [ = (1-residual variance)/observed variance] indicates the variance of the variable explained by the direct and indirect pathways pointing towards it.
Figure 2.Comparison between the effect of bacterial diversity (A) and fungal diversity (B) on soil CO2 fluxes along forest succession after a fire. Blue solid lines represent positive correlations and red lines are negative correlations, whereas the dashed grey lines show the paths that are not significant. The standardized coefficients for indicating the strength of the effects are presented on the significant paths with blue (positive) and red (negative) numbers. Significant levels are as follows: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. The r [ = (1-residual variance)/observed variance] indicates the variance of the variable explained by the direct and indirect pathways pointing towards it.
Figure 3.Principal component analysis (PCA) diagram to determine the contribution of bacterial diversity and fungal diversity on the frequencies of genes coding for different carbon compounds. Gene groups within the two circles represent their positive correlations with bacterial diversity and fungal diversity, respectively.
Parameters of multiple linear models explaining respiration measured from incubation experiment (microbial respiration) and from the field (CO2 emission).
| Formulas | Variables | Coefficients |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Microbial respiration (at 19 °C) | |||
| ∼ MBC + HBact + HFungi | MBC | 9.74 | < 0.01 |
| R2 = 0.31; | HBact | – | n.s. |
| HFungi | – | n.s. | |
| CO2 emission | |||
| ∼ MBC + HBact + HFungi | MBC | – | n.s. |
| R 2 = 0.16; | HBact | 0.21 | < 0.01 |
| HFungi | – | n.s. |
Figure 4.Principal component analysis (PCA) plots to show the ordination of functional genes along the first two axes and their correlation with (A) bacterial community (at phylum level) and (B) fungal community (at class level). Taxa that significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with the first two axes are highlighted in black.