| Literature DB >> 35749014 |
Sho Nishikawa1, Naoki Takahashi2, Yudai Nishikawa1, Seiji Yokoi1, Sayu Morita1, Yuki Shimamoto1, Sayumi Sakashita1, Kazuhisa Nishimori1, Mamiko Kobayashi1, Sachiko Fukushima1, Daisuke Mikami1, Hideki Kimura1, Kenji Kasuno1, Hironobu Naiki3, Masayuki Iwano1.
Abstract
We report on an 80-year-old man diagnosed with Fanconi syndrome induced by mizoribine after 4 weeks of administration to treat membranous nephropathy. Mizoribine is an oral immunosuppressant that inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase and is widely used in Japan for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and nephrotic syndrome, as well as after renal transplantation. Acquired Fanconi syndrome is often caused by drugs (antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer, and anticonvulsant drugs) and is sometimes caused by autoimmune diseases, monoclonal light chain-associated diseases, or heavy metal poisoning. In our patient, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, glucosuria, hypouricemia, and severe proteinuria resolved gradually after discontinuation of mizoribine administration, despite oral administration of prednisolone followed by a single intravenous injection of rituximab. The patient was ultimately diagnosed with Fanconi syndrome induced by mizoribine based on his clinical course and his typical laboratory data with the absence of proximal tubular acidosis. To our knowledge, this is the first report of Fanconi syndrome possibly induced by mizoribine. Although the precise mechanism by which mizoribine induces proximal tubular dysfunction is unknown, we suggest that nephrologists should be aware of the onset of Fanconi syndrome, a rare complication during mizoribine treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Drug induced; Fanconi syndrome; Immunosuppressive drugs; Membranous nephropathy; Mizoribine; Nephrotic syndrome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35749014 PMCID: PMC9243880 DOI: 10.1007/s13730-022-00715-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CEN Case Rep ISSN: 2192-4449
Fig. 1Renal biopsy specimens. A Light microscopy shows a glomerular basement membrane (GBM) with normal thickness and no spike formation in (PAM). Bar = 20 µm. B, C A small area of tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis was observed (PAS and trichrome) Bar = 50 µm. D Electron microscopy revealed subepithelial deposits (red arrowheads) in the GBM (Ehrenreich and Churg; stage I). Bar = 5 µm. E–H Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed fine granular IgG (E) and phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2r) (F) staining along the GBM (Bars = 20 µm) and no obvious linear deposition of kappa and lambda along the tubular basement membrane (G, H) (Bars = 50 µm)
Laboratory data on admission
| Complete blood count | ||
|---|---|---|
| WBC | 7600/μL | 3300–8600 |
| RBC | 3.92 × 106/μL | 4.35–5.55 × 106 |
| Hb | 12.1 g/dL | 13.7–16.8 |
| Plt | 42 × 104/μL | 15.8–34.8 × 104 |
| Blood chemistry | ||
| Na | 143 mEq/L | 138–145 |
| K | 3.1 mEq/L | 3.6–4.8 |
| Cl | 109 mEq/L | 101–108 |
| Ca | 7.4 mg/dL | 8.8–10.1 |
| IP | 2.6 mg/dL | 2.7–4.6 |
| Cre | 2.19 mg/dL | 0.65–1.07 |
| UN | 23 mg/dL | 8–20 |
| UA | 2.1 mg/dL | 3.7–7.8 |
| TP | 5.5 g/dL | 6.6–8.1 |
| Alb | 1.4 g/dL | 4.1–5.1 |
| AST | 21 U/L | 13–30 |
| ALT | 17 U/L | 10–42 |
| LD | 253 U/L | 124–222 |
| LDLC | 154 mg/dL | 65–163 |
| TG | 163 mg/dL | 40–234 |
| CRP | 0.35 mg/dL | 0–0.14 |
| BS | 154 mg/dL | 73–109 |
| HbA1c | 6.6% | 4.9–6.0 |
| eGFR | 23.4 mL/min/1.73m2 | > 60 |
| Serology | ||
| C3 | 106 mg/dL | 73–138 |
| C4 | 30.6 mg/dL | 11–31 |
| CH50 | 53 U/mL | 30–50 |
| IgG | 877 mg/dL | 861–1747 |
| IgA | 425 mg/dL | 93–393 |
| IgM | 113 mg/dL | 33–183 |
| ANA | < 40 | < 40 |
| MPO-ANCA | < 0.1 IU/mL | < 3.5 |
| PR3-ANCA | < 0.1 IU/mL | < 3.5 |
| Free light chain | 2.014 | 0.248–1.804 |
| M protein | (−) | (−) |
| HBs antigen | (−) | (−) |
| HBs antibody | (+) | (−) |
| HBc antibody | (−) | (−) |
| HBV-DNA | (−) | (−) |
| HCV antibody | (−) | (−) |
| HIV antibody | (−) | (−) |
| Venous gas analysis | ||
| pH | 7.365 | |
| PCO2 | 45.4 mmHg | |
| HCO3− | 25.3 mEq/L | |
| BE | 0.3 mEq/L | |
| Urinalysis | ||
| pH | 6.5 | 5.0–7.5 |
| Protein | 4 + | (−) |
| Occult blood | 3 + | (−) |
| Sugar | 4 + | (−) |
| Sediment | ||
| WBC | < 1/HPF | |
| RBC | 10–19/HPF dysmorphic | |
| Cast | ||
| Hyaline | 5 + | |
| Epithelial | 1 + | |
| Granular | 1 + | |
| Fatty | 2 + | |
| Urinalysis chemistry | ||
| U-Na | 46 mEq/L | |
| U-K | 52.4 mEq/L | |
| U-Cl | 52 mEq/L | |
| U-IP | 72 mg/dL | |
| U-Cr | 119 mg/dL | |
| U-TP/Cr | 9.24 g/gCr | < 0.14 |
| NAG | 21.7 U/L | 1.3–6.1 |
| B2MG | 61,368 µg/L | < 200 |
| Bence-Jones protein | (−) | (−) |
| %TRP | 49% | 60–90 |
| Selectivity index | 0.44 |
Fig. 2Clinical course of the patient. After administration of prednisolone and rituximab, biochemical markers gradually improved. Hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, and hypouricemia disappeared and proteinuria decreased. PSL, prednisolone; s-Cr, serum creatinine; U-P, urinary protein; IP inorganic phosphorus; UA, uric acid; RTX, rituximab