Literature DB >> 35748724

Altering enhancer-promoter linear distance impacts promoter competition in cis and in trans.

Jack R Bateman1, Justine E Johnson1.   

Abstract

In Drosophila, pairing of maternal and paternal homologs can permit trans-interactions between enhancers on one homolog and promoters on another, an example of a phenomenon called transvection. When chromosomes are paired, promoters in cis and in trans to an enhancer can compete for the enhancer's activity, but the parameters that govern this competition are as yet poorly understood. To assess how the linear spacing between an enhancer and promoter can influence promoter competition in Drosophila, we employed transgenic constructs wherein the eye-specific enhancer GMR is placed at varying distances from a heterologous hsp70 promoter driving a fluorescent reporter. While GMR activates the reporter to a high degree when the enhancer and promoter are spaced by a few hundred base pairs, activation is strongly attenuated when the enhancer is moved 3 kb away. By examining transcription of endogenous genes near the point of transgene insertion, we show that linear spacing of 3 kb between GMR and the hsp70 promoter results in elevated transcription of neighboring promoters, suggesting a loss of specificity between the enhancer and its intended transgenic target promoter. Furthermore, increasing spacing between GMR and hsp70 by just 100 bp can enhance transvection, resulting in increased activation of a promoter on a paired homolog at the expense of a promoter in cis to the enhancer. Finally, cis-/trans-promoter competition assays in which one promoter carries mutations to key core promoter elements show that GMR will skew its activity toward a wild-type promoter, suggesting that an enhancer is in a balanced competition between its potential target promoters in cis and in trans.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Drosophilazzm321990 ; Condensin; chromosome pairing; core promoter elements; enhancer–promoter specificity; transvection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35748724      PMCID: PMC9434180          DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.402


  88 in total

1.  A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay.

Authors:  R Kellum; P Schedl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Site-specific transformation of Drosophila via phiC31 integrase-mediated cassette exchange.

Authors:  Jack R Bateman; Anne M Lee; C-ting Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Architectural proteins, transcription, and the three-dimensional organization of the genome.

Authors:  Caelin Cubeñas-Potts; Victor G Corces
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  The Capacity to Act in Trans Varies Among Drosophila Enhancers.

Authors:  Amanda J Blick; Ilana Mayer-Hirshfeld; Beatriz R Malibiran; Matthew A Cooper; Pieter A Martino; Justine E Johnson; Jack R Bateman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Serial deletions and duplications suggest a mechanism for the collinearity of Hoxd genes in limbs.

Authors:  Marie Kmita; Nadine Fraudeau; Yann Hérault; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Nonlinear control of transcription through enhancer-promoter interactions.

Authors:  Jessica Zuin; Gregory Roth; Yinxiu Zhan; Julie Cramard; Josef Redolfi; Ewa Piskadlo; Pia Mach; Mariya Kryzhanovska; Gergely Tihanyi; Hubertus Kohler; Mathias Eder; Christ Leemans; Bas van Steensel; Peter Meister; Sebastien Smallwood; Luca Giorgetti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 69.504

7.  Live-cell imaging reveals enhancer-dependent Sox2 transcription in the absence of enhancer proximity.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Alexander; Juan Guan; Bingkun Li; Lenka Maliskova; Michael Song; Yin Shen; Bo Huang; Stavros Lomvardas; Orion D Weiner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Genome organization controls transcriptional dynamics during development.

Authors:  Philippe J Batut; Xin Yang Bing; Zachary Sisco; João Raimundo; Michal Levo; Michael S Levine
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Two modes of transvection at the eyes absent gene of Drosophila demonstrate plasticity in transcriptional regulatory interactions in cis and in trans.

Authors:  Katherine Tian; Rachel E Henderson; Reyna Parker; Alexia Brown; Justine E Johnson; Jack R Bateman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A revised model for promoter competition based on multi-way chromatin interactions at the α-globin locus.

Authors:  A Marieke Oudelaar; Caroline L Harrold; Lars L P Hanssen; Jelena M Telenius; Douglas R Higgs; Jim R Hughes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.