Literature DB >> 1569958

A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay.

R Kellum1, P Schedl.   

Abstract

Chromosomes of higher eukaryotes are thought to be organized into a series of discrete and topologically independent higher-order domains. In addition to providing a mechanism for chromatin compaction, these higher-order domains are thought to define independent units of gene activity. Implicit in most models for the folding of the chromatin fiber are special nucleoprotein structures, the domain boundaries, which serve to delimit each higher-order chromosomal domain. We have used an "enhancer-blocking assay" to test putative domain boundaries for boundary function in vivo. This assay is based on the notion that in delimiting independent units of gene activity, domain boundaries should be able to restrict the scope of activity of enhancer elements to genes which reside within the same domain. In this case, interposing a boundary between an enhancer and a promoter should block the action of the enhancer. In the experiments reported here, we have used the yolk protein-1 enhancer element and an hsp70 promoter:lacZ fusion gene to test putative boundary DNA segments for enhancer-blocking activity. We have found that several scs-like elements are capable of blocking the action of the yp-1 enhancer when placed between it and the hsp70 promoter. In contrast, a MAR/SAR DNA segment and another spacer DNA segment had no apparent effect on enhancer activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1569958      PMCID: PMC364415          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.12.5.2424-2431.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  29 in total

Review 1.  Position effects on eukaryotic gene expression.

Authors:  C Wilson; H J Bellen; W J Gehring
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Biol       Date:  1990

2.  A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains.

Authors:  R Kellum; P Schedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-03-08       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector.

Authors:  E Bier; H Vaessin; S Shepherd; K Lee; K McCall; S Barbel; L Ackerman; R Carretto; T Uemura; E Grell
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Enhancers: mechanisms of action and cell specificity.

Authors:  M L Atchison
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Biol       Date:  1988

5.  A tissue-specific transcription enhancer from the Drosophila yolk protein 1 gene.

Authors:  M J Garabedian; B M Shepherd; P C Wensink
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-06-20       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity.

Authors:  A Stief; D M Winter; W H Strätling; A E Sippel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A Drosophila melanogaster transfer RNA gene cluster at the cytogenetic locus 90BC.

Authors:  R DeLotto; P Schedl
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Analysis of the transcriptional enhancer effect.

Authors:  J de Villiers; L Olson; J Banerji; W Schaffner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1983

9.  Molecular organization of the decapentaplegic gene in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R D St Johnston; F M Hoffmann; R K Blackman; D Segal; R Grimaila; R W Padgett; H A Irick; W M Gelbart
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  DNA regions that regulate the ovarian transcriptional specificity of Drosophila yolk protein genes.

Authors:  S K Logan; M J Garabedian; P C Wensink
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  173 in total

1.  Positional enhancer-blocking activity of the chicken beta-globin insulator in transiently transfected cells.

Authors:  F Recillas-Targa; A C Bell; G Felsenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structural and functional conservation at the boundaries of the chicken beta-globin domain.

Authors:  N Saitoh; A C Bell; F Recillas-Targa; A G West; M Simpson; M Pikaart; G Felsenfeld
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  H19 and Igf2 monoallelic expression is regulated in two distinct ways by a shared cis acting regulatory region upstream of H19.

Authors:  M Srivastava; S Hsieh; A Grinberg; L Williams-Simons; S P Huang; K Pfeifer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Cohabitation of insulators and silencing elements in yeast subtelomeric regions.

Authors:  G Fourel; E Revardel; C E Koering; E Gilson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  The chicken beta-globin 5'HS4 boundary element blocks enhancer-mediated suppression of silencing.

Authors:  M C Walters; S Fiering; E E Bouhassira; D Scalzo; S Goeke; W Magis; D Garrick; E Whitelaw; D I Martin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Lack of shielding of primer binding site silencer-mediated repression of an internal promoter in a retrovirus vector by the putative insulators scs, BEAD-1, and HS4.

Authors:  C Modin; F S Pedersen; M Duch
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Differences in insulator properties revealed by enhancer blocking assays on episomes.

Authors:  T J Parnell; P K Geyer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Deletion of an insulator element by the mutation facet-strawberry in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Vazquez; P Schedl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A transcriptional insulator at the imprinted H19/Igf2 locus.

Authors:  C R Kaffer; M Srivastava; K Y Park; E Ives; S Hsieh; J Batlle; A Grinberg; S P Huang; K Pfeifer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Coupling of enhancer and insulator properties identified in two retrotransposons modulates their mutagenic impact on nearby genes.

Authors:  Caroline Conte; Bernard Dastugue; Chantal Vaury
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.