Literature DB >> 35747616

Intraclinician Variability in Force Application During Anteroposterior Mobilization of the Ankle Joint.

Aaron J Wholohan1, Ted Jedynak2.   

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to quantify the variability in the force applied during 20 cycles of Maitland's grade IV anteroposterior ankle mobilization measured on 2 occasions.
Methods: Thirteen healthy adults (mean age, 25 ± 5 years; height, 170 ± 7 cm; weight, 71 ± 16 kg) received 20 cycles of Maitland's grade IV ankle mobilization on 2 sessions separated by 1 week. A force transducer was used to measure the peak force, loading rate, and impulse applied during each load cycle. Mean within-session coefficient of variation, standard error of measurement, and 95% level of agreement were estimated during each mobilization session.
Results: The mean peak force during the anteroposterior mobilization technique was 70 ± 12 N and 58 ± 10 N during sessions 1 and 2, respectively. The mean within-session coefficients of variation in peak force, loading rate, and impulse applied during 20 loading cycles were 10% to 13%, 15%, and 21% to 43%, respectively. There was a significant difference between sessions in mean peak force (-17%, t 12 = 2.445, P = .031) and impulse (-51%, t 12 = 2.306, P = .040), with large 95% levels of agreement in applied peak force (±33 N) and impulse (±128 N s) compared to their mean values (approximately ±50% and 110%, respectively).
Conclusion: The peak force and loading rate applied by an experienced practitioner during a Maitland's grade IV anteroposterior talar mobilization session varied over 20 loading cycles. Variability between repeated mobilization sessions by the same practitioner was even greater, with respect to peak applied force and loading rate. The large variability in force applied during a Maitland's grade IV talar mobilization may underpin differential clinical effects reported in the joint-mobilization literature. The findings of this study highlight the need for strategies that standardize the application of force during talar mobilization.
© 2022 by National University of Health Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Musculoskeletal Manipulations; Reproducibility of Results; Therapeutics

Year:  2022        PMID: 35747616      PMCID: PMC9209819          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  13 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of a passive accessory joint mobilization on acute ankle inversion sprains.

Authors:  T Green; K Refshauge; J Crosbie; R Adams
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Variability of forces applied by experienced therapists during spinal mobilization.

Authors:  M. C. Harms; D. L. Bader
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Cervical spine mobilisation forces applied by physiotherapy students.

Authors:  Suzanne J Snodgrass; Darren A Rivett; Val J Robertson; Elizabeth Stojanovski
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  Manual forces applied during cervical mobilization.

Authors:  Suzanne J Snodgrass; Darren A Rivett; Val J Robertson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Study of the force applied during anteroposterior articular mobilization of the talus and its effect on the dorsiflexion range of motion.

Authors:  Claudia Venturini; Meliana Moller Penedo; Gustavo Henrique Peixoto; Mauro Heleno Chagas; Manuela Loureiro Ferreira; Marcos Antônio de Resende
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Force-displacement relationship during anteroposterior mobilization of the ankle joint.

Authors:  Marcelo V S de Souza; Claudia Venturini; Luciana M Teixeira; Mauro H Chagas; Marcos A de Resende
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 8.  Inter-clinician and intra-clinician reliability of force application during joint mobilization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kara S Gorgos; Nicole T Wasylyk; Bonnie L Van Lunen; Matthew C Hoch
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2013-12-24

9.  Manual physical therapy and exercise versus electrophysical agents and exercise in the management of plantar heel pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Joshua A Cleland; J Haxby Abbott; Martin O Kidd; Steve Stockwell; Sheryl Cheney; David F Gerrard; Timothy W Flynn
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Clinical Benefits of Joint Mobilization on Ankle Sprains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ishanka Weerasekara; Peter Osmotherly; Suzanne Snodgrass; Jodie Marquez; Rutger de Zoete; Darren A Rivett
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.