Helen L McLachlan1,2, Michelle Newton1,2, Fiona E McLardie-Hore1,3, Pamela McCalman1,3, Marika Jackomos4, Gina Bundle3, Sue Kildea5, Catherine Chamberlain1,6,7,8, Jennifer Browne9,10, Jenny Ryan3, Jane Freemantle6,11, Touran Shafiei1, Susan E Jacobs3,12,13, Jeremy Oats6, Ngaree Blow6, Karyn Ferguson11, Lisa Gold9, Jacqueline Watkins14, Maree Dell14, Kim Read15, Rebecca Hyde1,2,3, Robyn Matthews1,3, Della A Forster1,3. 1. Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086 Australia. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia. 3. The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. 4. Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia. 5. Molly Wardaguga Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs 0870, Australia. 6. Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3053, Australia. 7. Ngangk Yira: Murdoch University Research Centre for Aboriginal Health and Social Equity, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia. 8. The Lowitja Institute, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia. 9. Deakin University Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia. 10. Victorian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation, Collingwood, Victoria 3066, Australia. 11. Rural Health Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Shepparton, Victoria 3630, Australia. 12. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. 13. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. 14. Joan Kirner Hospital, Western Health St Albans, Victoria 3021, Australia. 15. Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, Victoria 3644, Australia.
Abstract
Background: Strategies to improve outcomes for Australian First Nations mothers and babies are urgently needed. Caseload midwifery, where women have midwife-led continuity throughout pregnancy, labour, birth and the early postnatal period, is associated with substantially better perinatal health outcomes, but few First Nations women receive it. We assessed the capacity of four maternity services in Victoria, Australia, to implement, embed, and sustain a culturally responsive caseload midwifery service. Methods: A prospective, non-randomised research translational study design was used. Site specific culturally responsive caseload models were developed by site working groups in partnership with their First Nations health units and the Victorian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation. The primary outcome was to increase the proportion of women having a First Nations baby proactively offered and receiving caseload midwifery as measured before and after programme implementation. The study was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Data collection commenced at the Royal Women's Hospital on 06/03/2017, Joan Kirner Women's and Children's Hospital 01/10/2017 and Mercy Hospital for Women 16/04/2018, with data collection completed at all sites on 31/12/2020. Findings: The model was successfully implemented in three major metropolitan maternity services between 2017 and 2020. Prior to this, over a similar timeframe, only 5.8% of First Nations women (n = 34) had ever received caseload midwifery at the three sites combined. Of 844 women offered the model, 90% (n = 758) accepted it, of whom 89% (n = 663) received it. Another 40 women received standard caseload. Factors including ongoing staffing crises, prevented the fourth site, in regional Victoria, implementing the model. Interpretation: Key enablers included co-design of the study and programme implementation with First Nations people, staff cultural competency training, identification of First Nations women (and babies), and regular engagement between caseload midwives and First Nations hospital and community teams. Further work should include a focus on addressing cultural and workforce barriers to implementation of culturally responsive caseload midwifery in regional areas. Funding: Partnership Grant (# 1110640), Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and La Trobe University.
Background: Strategies to improve outcomes for Australian First Nations mothers and babies are urgently needed. Caseload midwifery, where women have midwife-led continuity throughout pregnancy, labour, birth and the early postnatal period, is associated with substantially better perinatal health outcomes, but few First Nations women receive it. We assessed the capacity of four maternity services in Victoria, Australia, to implement, embed, and sustain a culturally responsive caseload midwifery service. Methods: A prospective, non-randomised research translational study design was used. Site specific culturally responsive caseload models were developed by site working groups in partnership with their First Nations health units and the Victorian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation. The primary outcome was to increase the proportion of women having a First Nations baby proactively offered and receiving caseload midwifery as measured before and after programme implementation. The study was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Data collection commenced at the Royal Women's Hospital on 06/03/2017, Joan Kirner Women's and Children's Hospital 01/10/2017 and Mercy Hospital for Women 16/04/2018, with data collection completed at all sites on 31/12/2020. Findings: The model was successfully implemented in three major metropolitan maternity services between 2017 and 2020. Prior to this, over a similar timeframe, only 5.8% of First Nations women (n = 34) had ever received caseload midwifery at the three sites combined. Of 844 women offered the model, 90% (n = 758) accepted it, of whom 89% (n = 663) received it. Another 40 women received standard caseload. Factors including ongoing staffing crises, prevented the fourth site, in regional Victoria, implementing the model. Interpretation: Key enablers included co-design of the study and programme implementation with First Nations people, staff cultural competency training, identification of First Nations women (and babies), and regular engagement between caseload midwives and First Nations hospital and community teams. Further work should include a focus on addressing cultural and workforce barriers to implementation of culturally responsive caseload midwifery in regional areas. Funding: Partnership Grant (# 1110640), Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and La Trobe University.
Authors: Sue Kildea; Yu Gao; Sophie Hickey; Carmel Nelson; Sue Kruske; Adrian Carson; Jody Currie; Maree Reynolds; Kay Wilson; Kristie Watego; Jo Costello; Yvette Roe Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Philippa Middleton; Tanya Bubner; Karen Glover; Alice Rumbold; Donna Weetra; Wendy Scheil; Stephanie Brown Journal: Aust N Z J Public Health Date: 2016-11-20 Impact factor: 2.939
Authors: H L McLachlan; D A Forster; M A Davey; T Farrell; L Gold; M A Biro; L Albers; M Flood; J Oats; U Waldenström Journal: BJOG Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Jo Longman; Jude Kornelsen; Jen Pilcher; Sue Kildea; Sue Kruske; Stefan Grzybowski; Sarah Robin; Margaret Rolfe; Deborah Donoghue; Geoffrey G Morgan; Lesley Barclay Journal: Health Policy Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Della A Forster; Helen L McLachlan; Mary-Ann Davey; Mary Anne Biro; Tanya Farrell; Lisa Gold; Maggie Flood; Touran Shafiei; Ulla Waldenström Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 3.007