Philippa Middleton1, Tanya Bubner2, Karen Glover3, Alice Rumbold4, Donna Weetra5, Wendy Scheil6, Stephanie Brown5. 1. Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, South Australia. 2. Innovative Community Action Networks (ICAN), Centacare Catholic Family Services, South Australia. 3. Aboriginal Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, South Australia. 4. Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia. 5. Healthy Mothers Healthy Families Research Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Victoria. 6. Department for Health, Government of South Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate implementation and outcomes of the Aboriginal Family Birthing Program (AFBP), which provides culturally competent antenatal, intrapartum and early postnatal care for Aboriginal families across South Australia (SA). METHODS: Analysis of births to Aboriginal women in SA 2010-2012; interviews with health professionals and AFBP clients. RESULTS: Around a third of all Aboriginal women giving birth in SA 2010-2012 (n=486) attended AFBP services. AFBP women were more likely to be more socially disadvantaged, have poorer pregnancy health and to have inadequate numbers of antenatal visits than Aboriginal women attending other services. Even with greater social disadvantage and higher clinical complexity, pregnancy outcomes were similar for AFBP and other Aboriginal women. Interviews with 107 health professionals (including 20 Aboriginal Maternal and Infant Care (AMIC) workers) indicated differing levels of commitment to the model, with some lack of clarity about AMIC workers and midwives roles. Interviews with 20 AFBP clients showed they highly valued care from another Aboriginal woman. CONCLUSIONS: Despite challenges, the AFBP reaches out to women with the greatest need, providing culturally appropriate, effective care through partnerships. Implications for Public Health: Programs like the AFBP need to be expanded and supported to improve maternal and child health outcomes for Aboriginal families.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate implementation and outcomes of the Aboriginal Family Birthing Program (AFBP), which provides culturally competent antenatal, intrapartum and early postnatal care for Aboriginal families across South Australia (SA). METHODS: Analysis of births to Aboriginal women in SA 2010-2012; interviews with health professionals and AFBP clients. RESULTS: Around a third of all Aboriginal women giving birth in SA 2010-2012 (n=486) attended AFBP services. AFBP women were more likely to be more socially disadvantaged, have poorer pregnancy health and to have inadequate numbers of antenatal visits than Aboriginal women attending other services. Even with greater social disadvantage and higher clinical complexity, pregnancy outcomes were similar for AFBP and other Aboriginal women. Interviews with 107 health professionals (including 20 Aboriginal Maternal and Infant Care (AMIC) workers) indicated differing levels of commitment to the model, with some lack of clarity about AMIC workers and midwives roles. Interviews with 20 AFBP clients showed they highly valued care from another Aboriginal woman. CONCLUSIONS: Despite challenges, the AFBP reaches out to women with the greatest need, providing culturally appropriate, effective care through partnerships. Implications for Public Health: Programs like the AFBP need to be expanded and supported to improve maternal and child health outcomes for Aboriginal families.
Authors: Helen L McLachlan; Michelle Newton; Fiona E McLardie-Hore; Pamela McCalman; Marika Jackomos; Gina Bundle; Sue Kildea; Catherine Chamberlain; Jennifer Browne; Jenny Ryan; Jane Freemantle; Touran Shafiei; Susan E Jacobs; Jeremy Oats; Ngaree Blow; Karyn Ferguson; Lisa Gold; Jacqueline Watkins; Maree Dell; Kim Read; Rebecca Hyde; Robyn Matthews; Della A Forster Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2022-05-04
Authors: Ariana C Villarosa; Amy R Villarosa; Yenna Salamonson; Lucie M Ramjan; Mariana S Sousa; Ravi Srinivas; Nathan Jones; Ajesh George Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.295