| Literature DB >> 35746757 |
Moses Muia Masika1,2, Essi M Korhonen3,4, Teemu Smura3,5, Ruut Uusitalo3,4,6, Joseph Ogola1,2, Dufton Mwaengo2, Anne J Jääskeläinen3,5, Hussein Alburkat3, Yong-Dae Gwon7, Magnus Evander7, Omu Anzala1,2, Olli Vapalahti3,4,5, Eili Huhtamo3,4.
Abstract
Several alphaviruses, such as chikungunya (CHIKV) and Onyong-nyong (ONNV), are endemic in Kenya and often cause outbreaks in different parts of the country. We assessed the seroprevalence of alphaviruses in patients with acute febrile illness in two geographically distant areas in Kenya with no previous record of alphavirus outbreaks. Blood samples were collected from febrile patients in health facilities located in the rural Taita-Taveta County in 2016 and urban Kibera informal settlement in Nairobi in 2017 and tested for CHIKV IgG and IgM antibodies using an in-house immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and a commercial ELISA test, respectively. A subset of CHIKV IgG or IgM antibody-positive samples were further analyzed using plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT) for CHIKV, ONNV, and Sindbis virus. Out of 537 patients, 4 (0.7%) and 28 (5.2%) had alphavirus IgM and IgG antibodies, respectively, confirmed on PRNT. We show evidence of previous and current exposure to alphaviruses based on serological testing in areas with no recorded history of outbreaks.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; Onyong-nyong; alphavirus; arbovirus; chikungunya; febrile illness; immunofluorescence; neutralization; seroprevalence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35746757 PMCID: PMC9230508 DOI: 10.3390/v14061286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.818
Figure 1A map of Kenya showing the study sites in Taita-Taveta County and Kibera slum, Nairobi. Indicated alongside the site names is the number of samples per site (denominator) and prevalence of chikungunya IgG antibodies by immunofluorescence assay (red text and percentage). Geographic information system (GIS) data for Kibera was obtained from Kounkuey Design Initiative [34]. Hillshade for Kibera was created in GIS software from digital elevation model (DEM) 5 m and for Taita-Taveta, hillshade was created from DEM 20 m [35].
Characteristics of study participants.
| Parameter | Taita-Taveta | Kibera | Total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 326 (59%) | 231 (41%) | 557 |
|
| |||
| Male | 146 (46%) | 115 (50%) | 261 (48%) |
| Female | 172 (54%) | 114 (50%) | 286 (52%) |
|
| |||
| Mean (Standard deviation (SD)) | 26.8 (22.1) | 16.2 (15.3) | 22.4 (20.2) |
| Median (Interquartile range (IQR)) | 20.6 (39.5) | 10.2 (24.4) | 16.4 (33.6) |
| Range | 6 months–85 years | 2 months–77 years | 2 months–85 years |
|
| |||
| 0–5 years | 69 (22%) | 87 (39%) | 156 (29%) |
| 5–17 years | 81 (25%) | 45 (20%) | 126 (23%) |
| 18 years and above | 169 (53%) | 94 (41%) | 263 (48%) |
|
| |||
| None | 15 (10%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (6%) |
| Primary school | 77 (50%) | 27 (30%) | 104 (42%) |
| Secondary school | 29 (19%) | 36 (40%) | 65 (27%) |
| Tertiary level | 34 (22%) | 27 (30%) | 61 (25%) |
|
| |||
| Any travel outside the study area | 54 (17%) | 88 (38%) | 142 (26%) |
| Travel to Nyanza or western Kenya | 9 (3%) | 56 (24%) | 65 (12%) |
| Travel to coastal Kenya | 37 (11%) | 2 (1%) | 39 (7%) |
|
| |||
| Contact with goats | 134 (41%) | 25 (11%) | 159 (29%) |
| Contact with cattle | 96 (29%) | 26 (11%) | 122 (22%) |
| Contact with chicken | 190 (58%) | 43 (19%) | 233 (42%) |
| Contact with cats | 61 (19%) | 87 (38%) | 148 (27%) |
| Contact with rodents | 217 (67%) | 127 (55%) | 344 (62%) |
| Contact with bats | 94 (29%) | 6 (3%) | 100 (18%) |
|
| |||
| Body Temperature in °C (Mean/SD) | 38.8 (0.56) | 38.4 (0.67) | 38.6 (0.63) |
| Median duration of fever (range) | 2 (1–7) days | 2 (1–14) | 2 (1–14) days |
| Joint pain | 139 (43%) | 70 (30%) | 209 (38%) |
| Myalgia | 123 (38%) | 65 (28%) | 188 (34%) |
| Headache | 53 (16%) | 108 (47%) | 161 (29%) |
| Cough | 44 (13%) | 95 (41%) | 139 (25%) |
| Vomiting | 53 (16%) | 68 (29%) | 121 (22%) |
| Diarrhoea | 29 (9%) | 47 (20%) | 76 (14%) |
| Rash | 18 (6%) | 16 (7%) | 34 (6%) |
Alphavirus plaque reduction neutralization test results.
| Sample Characteristics |
| CHIKV and ONNV Positive | CHIKV Positive | ONNV Positive | SINV Positive | Positive for Any Alphavirus | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHIKV IgG positive (IFA) | 31 | 12 (39%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (42%) | 0 (0%) | 25 (81%) | 6 (19%) |
| CHIKV IgM positive (ELISA) | 23 | 0 (0%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4%) | 22 (96%) |
| Both CHIKV IgG and IgM positive | 4 | 2 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (75%) | 1 (25%) |
| Negative | 11 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (9%) | 10 (91%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Association between patient characteristics and alphavirus IgG antibodies on Plaque Reduction Neutralization assay (PRNT).
| Characteristic | Alphavirus IgG Antibody Positive (PRNT) | Odds Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age Group | |||
| Adults | 24/253 (9.5%) | 9.5 (2.83–31.96) | <0.001 |
| Children (<18 years) | 3/275 (1.1%) | ||
| Gender | |||
| Female | 15/274 (5.5%) | 1.1 (0.49–2.29) | 1.000 |
| Male | 13/253 (5.1%) | ||
| Facility Location | |||
| Kibera | 21/228 (9.2%) | 4.3 (1.83–10.48) | <0.001 |
| Taita-Taveta | 7/309 (2.3%) | ||
| History of Travel | |||
| Yes | 9/137 (6.6%) | 1.5 (0.64–3.36) | 0.369 |
| No | 18/395 (4.6%) | ||
| Travel to Western Kenya | |||
| Yes | 7/62 (11.3%) | 2.8 (1.12–6.77) | 0.032 |
| No | 21/475 (4.4%) | ||
| Travel to Coastal Kenya | |||
| Yes | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0.5 (0.06–3.58) | 0.712 |
| No | 27/499 (5.4%) | ||
| Joint Pain | |||
| Yes | 17/201 (8.5%) | 2.7 (1.25–5.95) | 0.015 |
| No | 11/336 (3.3%) | ||
| Myalgia | |||
| Yes | 12/180 (6.7%) | 1.5 (0.70–3.29) | 0.307 |
| No | 16/357 (4.5%) | ||
| Headache | |||
| Yes | 16/157 (10.2%) | 3.5 (1.61–7.54) | 0.002 |
| No | 12/380 (3.2%) | ||
| Cough | |||
| Yes | 5/136 (3.7%) | 0.6 (0.23–1.68) | 0.503 |
| No | 25/401 (6.2%) | ||
| Contact with goats | |||
| Yes | 4/148 (2.7%) | 0.4 (0.14–1.24) | 0.130 |
| No | 24/389 (6.2%) | ||
| Contact with cattle | |||
| Yes | 4/117 (3.4%) | 0.6 (0.20–1.72) | 0.480 |
| No | 24/420 (5.7%) | ||
| Contact with rodents | |||
| Yes | 15/331 (4.5%) | 0.7 (0.33–1.51) | 0.426 |
| No | 13/206 (6.3%) | ||
| Contact with bats | |||
| Yes | 3/91 (3.3%) | 0.6 (0.17–1.94) | 0.450 |
| No | 25/446 (5.6%) | ||
| Any animal contact | |||
| Yes | 19/419 (4.5%) | 0.6 (0.25–1.31) | 0.238 |
| No | 9/118 (7.6%) |