| Literature DB >> 35745896 |
Elena Olăreț1, Ștefan Ioan Voicu1,2, Ruxandra Oprea2, Florin Miculescu3, Livia Butac2, Izabela-Cristina Stancu1, Andrada Serafim1.
Abstract
This work proposes a simple method to obtain nanostructured hydrogels with improved mechanical characteristics and relevant antibacterial behavior for applications in articular cartilage regeneration and repair. Low amounts of silver-decorated carbon-nanotubes (Ag@CNTs) were used as reinforcing agents of the semi-interpenetrating polymer network, consisting of linear polyacrylamide (PAAm) embedded in a PAAm-methylene-bis-acrylamide (MBA) hydrogel. The rational design of the materials considered a specific purpose for each employed species: (1) the classical PAAm-MBA network provides the backbone of the materials; (2) the linear PAAm (i) aids the dispersion of the nanospecies, ensuring the systems' homogeneity and (ii) enhances the mechanical properties of the materials with regard to resilience at repeated compressions and ultimate compression stress, as shown by the specific mechanical tests; and (3) the Ag@CNTs (i) reinforce the materials, making them more robust, and (ii) imprint antimicrobial characteristics on the obtained scaffolds. The tests also showed that the obtained materials are stable, exhibiting little degradation after 4 weeks of incubation in phosphate-buffered saline. Furthermore, as revealed by micro-computed tomography, the morphometric features of the scaffolds are adequate for applications in the field of articular tissue regeneration and repair.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; mechanical properties; nanostructured polyacrylamide; silver-decorated carbon nanotubes
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745896 PMCID: PMC9227893 DOI: 10.3390/polym14122320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Synthesized materials’ denomination and composition of the polymerization mixture.
| Series | Composition * | AAm:PAAm, wt./wt. | CNT:AAm, wt./wt. | CNT:Ag, wt./wt. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | AC-0 | - | 0:100 | - |
| AC-0.125 | - | 0.125:100 | - | |
| AC-0.25 | - | 0.25:100 | - | |
| AC-0.5 | - | 0.5:100 | - | |
| AC-1 | - | 1:100 | - | |
| PAC | PAC-0 | 100:25 | 0:100 | |
| PAC-0.125 | 0.125:100 | - | ||
| PAC-0.25 | 0.25:100 | - | ||
| PAC-0.5 | 0.5:100 | - | ||
| PAC-1 | 1:100 | - | ||
| Ag@PAC | Ag@PAC-0 | 100:25 | 0:100 | 100:1 |
| Ag@PAC-0.125 | 0.125:100 | |||
| Ag@PAC-0.25 | 0.25:100 | |||
| Ag@PAC-0.5 | 0.5:100 | |||
| Ag@PAC-1 | 1:100 |
* Constant parameters: AAm concentration—10% wt./vol. in the final solution; AAm:MBA = 100:2 wt./wt.
Figure 1Panel (A): schematical depiction of the synthesis process of the polyacrylamide-based hydrogels reinforced with Ag-decorated CNTs; Panel (B): digital images of the obtained hydrogels at hydration equilibrium.
Figure 2Gel fraction (A) and swelling degree (B) values computed for the AC (patterned columns) and PAC (full color columns) series. Statistical significance: ^^, ** p < 0.01, ^^^ p < 0.001, ns—not statistically significant.
Figure 3Three-dimensional images of the AC samples and graphical representation of the porosity measurements.
Figure 4Three-dimensional images of the PAC samples and graphical representation of the porosity measurements.
Morphometric parameters registered through micro-CT.
| Sample | Specific Surface Area, mm−1 | Total Porosity, % | Open Porosity, % | Closed Porosity, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-0 | 437.10 | 92.584 | 92.584 | 0.000 |
| AC-0.125 | 289.33 | 91.985 | 91.983 | 0.020 |
| AC-0.25 | 456.90 | 92.818 | 92.818 | 0.000 |
| AC-0.5 | 384.21 | 94.607 | 94.607 | 0.000 |
| AC-1 | 310.30 | 91.438 | 91.440 | 0.024 |
| PAC-0 | 335.98 | 89.112 | 89.109 | 0.027 |
| PAC-0.125 | 345.72 | 89.094 | 89.094 | 0.000 |
| PAC-0.25 | 382.09 | 86.189 | 86.188 | 0.002 |
| PAC-0.5 | 441.45 | 88.894 | 88.894 | 0.000 |
| PAC-1 | 384.99 | 91.782 | 91.782 | 0.005 |
Figure 5First cycle of loading–unloading compressions for the AC (left) and PAC (right) series.
Mechanical parameters of the AC and PAC hydrogels.
| Sample | Hysteresis, % | Hysteresis, % | Ultimate Compression Stress, kPa | E′ at 2% Deformation, |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-0 | 11.55 | 12.15 | 212.83 ± 63.08 | 46.81 ± 3.44 |
| AC-0.125 | 8.42 | 9.49 | 142.49 ± 70.6 | 54.37 ± 8.00 |
| AC-0.25 | 8.62 | 10.06 | 150.32 ± 12.75 | 51.10 ± 4.15 |
| AC-0.5 | 14.76 | 17.49 | 285.66 ± 73.4 | 50.66 ± 5.60 |
| AC-1 | 12.66 | 12.68 | 357.53 ± 26.94 | 52.31 ± 5.00 |
| PAC-0 | 11.37 | 13.25 | * | 38.95 ± 2.79 |
| PAC-0.125 | 5.95 | 6.97 | * | 39.63 ± 6.17 |
| PAC-0.25 | 9.36 | 9.80 | * | 39.68 ± 2.96 |
| PAC-0.5 | 6.71 | 8.66 | 447.67 ± 75.97 | 42.44 ± 3.00 |
| PAC-1 | 7.37 | 7.65 | 630.81 ± 88.65 | 42.93 ± 0.69 |
* no breakage within the equipment compression limits.
Figure 6Hydrogels stability after 28 days incubation in PBS. Statistical significance: ^^, ## p < 0.01, ^^^ p < 0.001.
Figure 7Antimicrobial efficiency of the Ag@PAC series compared to PAC counterparts.
Silver content (% wt./wt. with respect to the total solid content) and antibacterial efficiency of the PAC and Ag@PAC series against Gram-negative (E. coli) and Gram-positive (S. aureus) samples.
| Sample | Silver Content, | Antibacterial Activity, % | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| control | - | 5 | 5 |
| PAC-0.125 | - | 5 | 5 |
| PAC-0.25 | - | 15 | 5 |
| PAC-0.5 | - | 10 | 5 |
| PAC-1 | - | 10 | 10 |
| Ag@PAC-0 | 0 | 25 | 15 |
| Ag@PAC-0.125 | 9.8 × 10−4 | 25 | 25 |
| Ag@PAC-0.25 | 19.6 × 10−4 | 35 | 50 |
| Ag@PAC-0.5 | 39.2 × 10−4 | 95 | 98 |
| Ag@PAC-1 | 78.4 × 10−4 | 99 | 100 |