| Literature DB >> 35745883 |
Mioara Drobota1, Stefan Ursache2, Magdalena Aflori1.
Abstract
Changes of a material biointerface allow for specialized cell signaling and diverse biological responses. Biomaterials incorporating immobilized bioactive ligands have been widely introduced and used for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications in order to develop biomaterials with improved functionality. Furthermore, a variety of physical and chemical techniques have been utilized to improve biomaterial functionality, particularly at the material interface. At the interface level, the interactions between materials and cells are described. The importance of surface features in cell function is then examined, with new strategies for surface modification being highlighted in detail.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial; biomaterial; cell–interface interaction; polymers; surface functionalities
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745883 PMCID: PMC9229900 DOI: 10.3390/polym14122307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1The most representative physical (a) and chemical (b) modifications of polymers. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [6]. Copyright 2019 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
Figure 2The PLL modified porous PLGA microspheres. (a) Schematic illustration of the formation process. (b) The microspheres after culturing with MG63 for different times; fluorescence micrographs scale bar 200 μm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [4]. Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V.
Figure 3Illustration of the PLA aminolysis surface reaction. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [19]. Copyright 2013 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 4Versatility of layer-by-layer assembly. (A) Schematic illustration of LbL assembly. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [24]. Copyright 2015 The American Association for the Advancement of Science. (B) Scheme of the assembly and annealing protocol, phase contrast images of C2C12 cells adhered on different substrates, and average cell adhesion spreading area from cells seeded on different substrates and physicochemical properties of PEMs. (C) Scheme of protein adhesion mechanism and the effects on cell adhesion characteristics for nPLL/Alg and a-PLL/Alg. (D) Scheme of protein and cell interactions with n-Chi/HA and a--Chi/HA PEMs. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [24]. Copyright 2015 The American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Figure 5(a) Illustration of mechanism of buffering activity of polyelectrolyte coating. (b) The SEM images of the aluminum surface showing that when the number of polyelectrolyte multilayers increases, a homogeneous polyelectrolyte coating form. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [37]. Copyright 2008 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 6Illustration of different grafting synthetic routes. (a) Step-wise “grafting-to” of individual homopolymers, (b) “grafting-to” of Y-shaped diblock copolymers, (c) step-wise “grafting-from” via surface-initiated free-radical polymerization (SI-FRP) using non-selective initiators, (d) “grafting-from” via surface-initiated reversible-deactivation radical polymerization (SI-RDRP) using two disparate co-deposited initiators, and (e) “grafting-from” via SI-RDRP using Y-shaped bifunctional initiators. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [41]. Copyright 2020 Li and Pester under CC BY 4.0.
Figure 7(A) Schematic representation of the two-step treatment. (B) Cell culture (cell line MC3T3-E1) after 48 h. (C) Strain adherence of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (ATCC, clinical isolates) to polylactic acid films, *, ** and *** represents the magnitude of antimicrobial activity. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [73]. Copyright 2021 Aflori under CC BY 4.0.
Figure 8SEM image of the diameter distribution and morphologies of the nanofibrous mats (A): (1) C, (2) C-PET, (3) PET. Cells cultured on nanofibrous mats of (B): (1) C, (2) C-PET, and (3) PET. (4) Schematic mechanism of proliferated cell growth. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [133]. Copyright 2020 Drobota, Gradinaru, Vlad, Bargan, Butnaru, Angheloiu, Aflori under CC BY 4.0.
Figure 9Schematic representation of the main properties responsible for biological responses on the biomaterial surfaces. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [190]. Copyright 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 10(a) SEM images and (b) illustration of cell adhesion behaviors on PLLA NFS (b1,b2) and P-PLLA NFS (b3,b4) at different time intervals. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [73]. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.
Figure 11Schematic illustration of surface influence on the biomaterial surface (A). The surface properties that may modulate cellular behaviors. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [6]. Copyright 2019 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany. (B) Traditional theories of foreign body reactions to surface modification. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [190]. Copyright 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
The most important methods described in the paper, connecting the surface proprieties with their applications.
| No | Methods | Properties | Applications | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chemically hydrolyzed | Increased | endothelial cell adhesion, hemocompatibility | [ |
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| 2 | Aminolysis | highest wettability | immobilize bioactive agents such as collagen | [ |
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| 3. | Layer by layer | surface roughness, porosity | human osteoblasts | [ |
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| 4. | Surface graft polymerization | hydrophilicity | endothelial cell, corneal epithelial cell, MRI contrast imaging | [ |
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| 5. | Plasma | wettability, hydrophilicity, | collagen adsorbtion | [ |
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| 6. | UV | polarity wettability, | [ | |
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| 7. | Electrospinning | morphology | human epithelial cell line, skin regenerative | [ |
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| [ | ||||
| 8. | Laser | roughness, wettability | human mesenchymal cell differentiation | [ |
| [ | ||||
| [ |