| Literature DB >> 35745390 |
Yahia H Ahmad1, Aymen S Abu Hatab1,2, Assem T Mohamed1, Mohammed S Al-Kuwari3, Amina S Aljaber1, Siham Y Al-Qaradawi1.
Abstract
Assigned to their outstanding physicochemical properties, TiO2-based materials have been studied in various applications. Herein, TiO2 doped with different Mo contents (Mo-TiO2) was synthesized via a microwave-assisted solvothermal approach. This was achieved using titanium (IV) butoxide and molybdenum (III) chloride as a precursor and dodecylamine as a surface directing agent. The uniform effective heating delivered by microwave heating reduced the reaction time to less than 30 min, representing several orders of magnitude lower than conventional heating methods. The average particle size ranged between 9.7 and 27.5 nm and it decreased with increasing the Mo content. Furthermore, Mo-TiO2 revealed mesoporous architectures with a high surface area ranging between 170 and 260 m2 g-1, which is superior compared to previously reported Mo-doped TiO2. The performance of Mo-TiO2 was evaluated towards the adsorption of Rhodamine B (RhB). In contrast to TiO2, which revealed negligible adsorption for RhB, Mo-doped samples depicted rapid adsorption for RhB, with a rate that increased with the increase in Mo content. Additionally, Mo-TiO2 expressed enhanced adsorption kinetics for RhB compared to state-of-the-art adsorbents. The introduced synthesis procedure holds a grand promise for the versatile synthesis of metal-doped TiO2 nanostructures with outstanding physicochemical properties.Entities:
Keywords: Mo-doped TiO2; Rhodamine B; adsorption; microwave-assisted synthesis; titanium oxide
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745390 PMCID: PMC9227794 DOI: 10.3390/nano12122051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Scheme 1The synthesis procedure of Mo-TiO2.
Scheme 2Schematic diagram for the formation mechanism of Mo-TiO2.
Figure 1TEM micrographs and the corresponding particle size distribution of (a) TiO2, (b) TiO2-Mo-0.9, (c) TiO2-Mo-1.5, (d) TiO2-Mo-2.2, and (e) TiO2-Mo-3.1.
Figure 2(a) High magnification TEM image, (b) HRTEM image, and (c) SAED pattern of TiO2-Mo-3.1.
Figure 3N2 physisorption isotherms of (a) TiO2, (b) TiO2-Mo-0.9, (c) TiO2-Mo-1.5, (d) TiO2-Mo-2.2, and (e) TiO2-Mo-3.1. The inset figures represent the pore sizes distribution curves.
The textural properties of investigated samples as evaluated from EDX analysis, XRD, and N2 physisorption experiments at −196 °C.
| Sample | Atomic Ratio of Mo from EDX | Atomic Ratio of Mo from XPS | Specific Surface Area (m2 g−1) | Pore Volume (cm3 g−1) | Pore Radius (nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | - | - | 13.71 | 2.53 × 10−2 | 91.7 | 0.35 | 7.6 |
| TiO2-Mo-0.9 | 0.93 | 1.23 | 10.74 | 3.23 × 10−2 | 173.7 | 0.62 | 7.2 |
| TiO2-Mo-1.5 | 1.45 | 1.92 | 9.94 | 3.49 × 10−2 | 191.7 | 0.36 | 3.7 |
| TiO2-Mo-2.2 | 2.23 | 2.75 | 8.96 | 3.87 × 10−2 | 206.6 | 0.33 | 3.2 |
| TiO2-Mo-3.1 | 3.09 | 4.46 | 7.93 | 4.37 × 10−2 | 256.5 | 0.41 | 3.2 |
Summary of some previous studies demonstrating the synthesis of Mo-doped TiO2.
| Preparation Method | Metals Precursors | Reaction Conditions | Mo Ratio (%) | Specific Surface Area m2 g−1 (Pore Volume cm3 g−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reverse micelle micro-emulsion sol-gel method | Titanium butoxide & ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate | polyoxyethylene (20) oleyl ether (Brij O20) surfactants are dispersed in cyclohexane | 0 (TiO2) | 71 (0.091) | [ |
| One-pot hydrothermal method | dihydroxy bis (ammonium lactato) titanium (IV) & ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate | aqueous medium 200 °C, 12 h, 8 °C/min. | 0 (TiO2) | 119 (0.32) | [ |
| Sol-gel technique | Titanium butoxide & molybdenum pentachloride | Ethanol/acetylacetone/HCl sol is formed, left for 48 h, dry at 80 °C, then calcine at 450 °C | - | - | [ |
| Hydrothermal method | TiO2 powder & ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate | 10 M NaOH, 180 °C/24 h | 0 (TiO2) | 112 | [ |
| Evaporation Induced Self Assembly | Titanium butoxide & ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate | Ethanol/HNO3, rotary evaporator/17 h, calcine at 300 °C/1 h, then calcine at 400 °C | 0 (TiO2) | 144 | [ |
| Hydrothermal method | titanium tetra-isopropoxide & molybdenum pentachloride | Isopropanol/H2O, hydrothermal 150 °C/20 h, calcine 500 °C/4 h | 0 (TiO2) | 129 | [ |
| Reverse micelle sol-gel synthesis | Titanium butoxide & ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate | Polyoxyethylene, oleyl ether, Brij O20 surfactants, cyclohexane/H2O, then emulsion broken by 2-propanol, calcine at 500 °C/2 h | 0 (TiO2) | 71 | [ |
| Microwave-assisted solvothermal method | Titanium butoxide & molybdenum (III) chloride | Dodecylamine surfactant, isopropanol/20% HCl, 160 °C, 30 min. | 0 (TiO2) | 91.7 (0.35) | This work |
Figure 4XRD spectra of studied nanomaterials.
Figure 5Deconvoluted XPS high-resolution spectra of (a) Ti 2p, (b) Mo 3d, and (c) O 1s in Mo-TiO2-3.1.
Figure 6(a) Raman spectra of investigated TiO2-based materials and (b) the variation of zeta-potential of investigated nanomaterials with the pH.
Figure 7(a) Effect of contact time on the adsorption of RhB on different adsorbents (C = 10 mg L−1, temperature = 298 K), (b) Effect of initial concentration and contact time on the adsorption of RhB on TiO2-Mo-3.1 at 293 K, and (c) Effect of the initial concentration on the removal efficiency of RhB at 293 K.
Figure 8Fitting of equilibrium data to the different adsorption isotherms; (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, (c) Temkin, and (d) Dubinin–Radushkevich.
Summary of isotherms parameters.
| Isotherm | Parameter | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Langmuir |
| 69.01 |
| K (L mg−1) | 0.288 | |
| R2 | 0.981 | |
| Freundlich |
| 2.09 |
| Kf (L g−1) | 17.273 | |
| R2 | 0.943 | |
| Temkin | B | 15.054 |
| AT (L g−1) | 1.053 | |
| bT (J mol−1) | 162.374 | |
| R2 | 0.971 | |
| Dubinin–Radushkevich | 45.403 | |
| R2 | 0.881 |
Figure 9Fitting of adsorption data to (a) pseudo-first order model and (b) pseudo-second order model.
The kinetic parameters calculated from the pseudo first- and the second-order models.
| Pseudo-First Order Model | Pseudo-Second Order Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | R2 | |||||
| 15 | 0.0568 | 1.468 | 0.8399 | 0.0916 | 14.138 | 0.9999 |
| 20 | 0.0474 | 1.807 | 0.8455 | 0.0542 | 18.615 | 0.9999 |
| 25 | 0.0212 | 2.515 | 0.7726 | 0.0126 | 24.073 | 0.9998 |
| 30 | 0.0541 | 3.611 | 0.8272 | 0.0084 | 27.115 | 0.9997 |
| 40 | 0.0579 | 3.863 | 0.9581 | 0.0074 | 37.779 | 0.9998 |
| 50 | 0.0641 | 3.846 | 0.9797 | 0.0071 | 45.167 | 0.9994 |
| 60 | 0.0630 | 3.472 | 0.9603 | 0.0109 | 50.505 | 0.9999 |
| 70 | 0.0630 | 5.884 | 0.9455 | 0.0136 | 57.208 | 0.9999 |
Previously reported pseudo-second order rate constants for RhB onto other adsorbents.
| Adsorbent | RhB Concentration, mg L−1 | Temperature (K) | Rate Constant, | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MoS2 mesoporous microspheres prepared using CH4N2S | 10 | 293 | 3.0 | [ |
| treated rice husk-based activated carbon | 100 | 293 | 1.68 | [ |
| graphene oxide/4A molecular sieve composite | 10 | 298 | 23.0 | [ |
| Beta zeolites (SiO2/Al2O3 = 18.4) | 20 | 295 | 61.0 | [ |
| Kaolinite | 20 | 303 | 4.69 | [ |
| Gum ghatti/Fe3O4 nanocomposite | 50 | 298 | 67.0 | [ |
| ZnO/Zr-MOF(bpy) nanocomposite | 10 | 298 | 2.69 | [ |
| TiO2-Mo-3.1 | 15 | 293 | 91.6 | This work |
Figure 10Particle diffusion model of RhB on TiO2-Mo-3.1 at different RhB concentrations.