| Literature DB >> 35744861 |
Zhengqi Dong1,2,3, Xiangtao Wang1, Mingyue Wang1,4, Rui Wang4, Zheng Meng1, Xiaotong Wang1,4, Bo Yu1, Meihua Han1, Yifei Guo1,2,3.
Abstract
Naringenin (NRG) is a natural compound with several biological activities; however, its bioavailability is limited owing to poor aqueous solubility. In this study, NRG nanoparticles (NPs) were prepared using the wet media milling method. To obtain NRG NPs with a small particle size and high drug-loading content, the preparation conditions, including stirring time, temperature, stirring speed, and milling media amount, were optimized. The NRG (30 mg) and D-α-tocopherol polyethylene glycol succinate (10 mg) were wet-milled in deionized water (2 mL) with 10 g of zirconia beads via stirring at 50 °C for 2 h at a stirring speed of 300 rpm. As a result, the NRG NPs, with sheet-like morphology and a diameter of approximately 182.2 nm, were successfully prepared. The NRG NPs were stable in the gastrointestinal system and were released effectively after entering the blood circulation. In vivo experiments indicated that the NRG NPs have good antitussive effects. The cough inhibition rate after the administration of the NRG NPs was 66.7%, cough frequency was three times lower, and the potential period was 1.8 times longer than that in the blank model group. In addition, the enzyme biomarkers and histological analysis results revealed that the NRG NPs can effectively regulate the inflammatory and oxidative stress response. In conclusion, the NRG NPs exhibited good oral bioavailability and promoted antitussive and anti-inflammatory effects.Entities:
Keywords: anti-inflammatory effect; antioxidant effect; antitussive effect; nanoparticle; naringenin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35744861 PMCID: PMC9228777 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27123736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Results of NRG NPs at different FWRs.
| Sample | FWR a | D | PDI c | DLC d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1/1 | 214.2 ± 3.3 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 42.3 ± 1.9 |
| 2 | 2/1 | 227.6 ± 3.2 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 60.0 ± 0.3 *** |
| 3 | 3/1 | 225.3 ± 5.6 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 66.1 ± 0.8 ## |
| 4 | 4/1 | 218.6 ± 5.3 | 0.32 ± 0.09 | 64.5 ± 2.9 |
a Feed weight ratio of drug to nanocarriers; b hydrodynamic diameter, determined using dynamic light scattering (DLS); c polydispersity index, detected by DLS; d drug-loading content; determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). (n = 3), *** p < 0.001, vs. sample 1, ## p < 0.01, vs. sample 2.
Effect of time, temperature, speed, and the amount of milling media on the size and size distribution of NRG NPs.
| Sample | Time a | T b | Speed c | Wbead
d | D | PDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 25 | 200 | 8 | 237.1 ± 1.8 | 0.29 ± 0.06 |
| 2 | 2 | 25 | 200 | 8 | 229.3 ± 1.8 | 0.24 ± 0.04 |
| 3 | 3 | 25 | 200 | 8 | 264.1 ± 1.2 | 0.26 ± 0.05 |
| 4 | 4 | 25 | 200 | 8 | 296.6 ± 1.2 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | 200 | 8 | 267.1 ± 6.2 | 0.42 ± 0.05 |
| 6 | 2 | 25 | 200 | 8 | 233.6 ± 4.2 | 0.27 ± 0.07 |
| 7 | 2 | 50 | 200 | 8 | 219.9 ± 3.9 | 0.22 ± 0.04 |
| 8 | 2 | 60 | 200 | 8 | 285.3 ± 3.1 | 0.30 ± 0.04 |
| 9 | 2 | 50 | 100 | 8 | 270.9 ± 2.5 | 0.27 ± 0.08 |
| 10 | 2 | 50 | 200 | 8 | 224.9 ± 2.1 | 0.28 ± 0.04 |
| 11 | 2 | 50 | 300 | 8 | 209.4 ± 1.5 | 0.22 ± 0.05 |
| 12 | 2 | 50 | 400 | 8 | 212.7 ± 1.3 | 0.21 ± 0.06 |
| 13 | 2 | 50 | 300 | 5 | 354.2 ± 3.2 | 0.42 ± 0.02 |
| 14 | 2 | 50 | 300 | 8 | 208.6 ± 2.1 | 0.29 ± 0.02 |
| 15 | 2 | 50 | 300 | 10 | 182.2 ± 3.4 | 0.28 ± 0.06 |
| 16 | 2 | 50 | 300 | 15 | 233.5 ± 2.1 | 0.21 ± 0.05 |
a Stirring time; b stirring temperature; c stirring speed; d weight of zirconia beads; n = 3.
Figure 1Particle size distribution curve (a) and TEM image (b) of NRG NPs, scale bar: 500 nm (insert, scale bar: 100 nm).
Figure 2DSC curves (a) and XRD curves (b) of NRG, TPGS, their physical mixture, and NRG NPs.
Figure 3Time-dependent cumulative release profile of NRG NPs and NRG powder at 37 °C, n = 3.
Figure 4Cough frequency in 5 min (a) and cough potential period (b) of NRG NPs on PIC mice model (n = 10). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 vs. blank model group; # p < 0.05 vs. NRG group.
Figure 5Anti-inflammatory activity: IL-6 biomarker level (a), and CRP biomarker level (b); antioxidant activity of NRG NPs: MDA biomarker level (c), and SOD biomarker level (d) (n = 5). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 vs. blank model group, # p < 0.05 vs. NRG group.
Figure 6HE staining images of blank model, positive drug, NRG, and NRG NPs groups: trachea tissue (line 1), lung tissue images (line 2).
Figure 7Schematic protocol for establishing the PIC model and the treatment schedule.