| Literature DB >> 29496577 |
Yun-Li Zhao1, Zi-Feng Yang2, Jian-Hua Shang1, Wan-Yi Huang2, Bei Wang1, Xin Wei1, Afsar Khan3, Zhi-Wei Yuan4, Ya-Ping Liu1, Yi-Fen Wang1, Xin-Hua Wang5, Xiao-Dong Luo6.
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Leaf of Alstonia scholaris (L.) R. Br. (Apocynaceae), a wide used ethic-medicine in many Asia and Africa counties, has also been recorded as the common traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of illnesses in respiratory system by Dai people. AIM OF THE STUDY: To provide experimental data of clinical adaption of total indole alkaloids (TA) from leaf of A. scholaris for treating post-infectious cough in phase II clinical trial.Entities:
Keywords: 19-Epischolaricine; Indole alkaloids; Leaf of Alstonia scholaris; Picrinine; Post-infectious cough; Scholaricine; Vallesamine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29496577 PMCID: PMC7126965 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2018.02.040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnopharmacol ISSN: 0378-8741 Impact factor: 4.360
Fig. 1Four major alkaloids from leaf of A. scholaris.
Fig. 2Experimental protocol for the establishment of LPS and CS induced PIC model and the treatment schedule.
The production of total leukocytes in BALF after treatment.
| Groups | WBC (× 105/mL) | NEU (× 105/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 0.54 ± 0.12 |
| Model | 3.8 ± 0.8△ | 1.10 ± 0.08△ |
| DXM | 1.1 ± 0.2* | 0.53 ± 0.16* |
| TA-H | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 0.43 ± 0.08** |
| TA-M | 1.6 ± 0.4 | 0.54 ± 0.08** |
| TA-L | 1.1 ± 0.3* | 0.43 ± 0.08** |
| Sch | 2.5 ± 1.1 | 0.66 ± 0.26 |
| Epi | 1.6 ± 0.5* | 0.64 ± 0.17 |
| Val | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 0.75 ± 0.16 |
| Pic | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 0.51 ± 0.09** |
Note: Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences are represented as △p < 0.05 vs. control, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model (n = 10 mice per group). WBC, white blood (cell) count. NEU, neutrophils. All groups were intra-gastrically administrated.
Control: challenged with saline.
Model: established by intratracheal instillation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and passive smoking.
DXM: dexamethasone, 1 mg/kg.
TA-H: administrated total alkaloids, 50 mg/kg.
TA-M: administrated total alkaloids, 25 mg/kg.
TA-L: administrated total alkaloids, 10 mg/kg.
Sch, scholaricine, 3 mg/kg.
Epi, 19-epischolaricine, 1 mg/kg.
Val, vallesamine, 3 mg/kg.
Pic, picrinine, 5 mg/kg.
The production of IL-6 and CRP in serum after treatment.
| Groups | IL-6 (pg/mL) | CRP (pg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 20.8 ± 0.7 | 20.8 ± 0.9 |
| Model | 26.5 ± 1.1△ | 24.8 ± 0.5△ |
| DXM | 22.0 ± 0.6* | 22.3 ± 0.6* |
| TA-H | 23.2 ± 1.3 | 22.7 ± 0.5* |
| TA-M | 24.1 ± 0.8 | 23.5 ± 0.6 |
| TA-L | 22.7 ± 0.6* | 22.9 ± 0.4* |
| Sch | 22.2 ± 0.9* | 24.4 ± 0.8 |
| Epi | 25.2 ± 1.2 | 24.8 ± 0.7 |
| Val | 25 ± 1.1 | 23.8 ± 0.6 |
| Pic | 23.9 ± 1.2 | 23.5 ± 0.7 |
Note: Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences are represented as △p < 0.05 vs. control, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model (n = 10 mice per group). IL-6, interleukin-6. CRP, C-reactive protein. All groups were intra-gastrically administrated.
The production of SOD in serum and homogenate after treatment( mean ± SEM, U/mL).
| Groups | serum | homogenate |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 93.5 ± 1.7 | 61.3 ± 1.1 |
| Model | 85.5 ± 2.4△ | 53.4 ± 2.1△ |
| DXM | 86.9 ± 3.0 | 63.9 ± 1.8* |
| TA-H | 92.2 ± 2.7 | 54.0 ± 5.3 |
| TA-M | 97.7 ± 2.5* | 64.2 ± 1.5** |
| TA-L | 94.7 ± 2.2* | 63.1 ± 2.2* |
| Sch | 93.6 ± 3.9 | 58.4 ± 2.2 |
| Epi | 89.7 ± 6.9 | 54.2 ± 3.4 |
| Val | 91.7 ± 3.9 | 58.4 ± 1.8 |
| Pic | 91.2 ± 3.4 | 56.0 ± 4.0 |
Note: Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences are represented as △p < 0.05 vs. control, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model (n = 10 mice per group). SOD, superoxide dismutase. All groups were intra-gastrically administrated.
The production of MDA in serum and homogenate after treatment (nmol/mL).
| Groups | Serum | Homogenate |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 9.8 ± 0.9 | 6.4 ± 0.2 |
| Model | 13.7 ± 0.7△ | 7.4 ± 0.2△△ |
| DXM | 14.0 ± 1.2 | 6.2 ± 0.2** |
| TA-H | 11.9 ± 0.7 | 6.6 ± 0.4 |
| TA-M | 12.1 ± 2.0 | 6.2 ± 0.3 |
| TA-L | 11.0 ± 0.8* | 6.1 ± 0.4* |
| Sch | 12.2 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 0.4* |
| Epi | 11.6 ± 0.9 | 6.4 ± 0.5 |
| Val | 11.1 ± 0.4** | 7.1 ± 0.5 |
| Pic | 11.2 ± 1.4 | 6.2 ± 0.5 |
Note: Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences are represented as △p < 0.05, △△p < 0.01 vs. control, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model (n = 10 mice per group). MDA, malondialdehyde. All groups were intra-gastrically administrated.
Fig. 3Representative microscopic sections of tissue demonstrating lung histology. The lung sections were stained with H&E and examined by light microscopy. Original magnification × 200.
Pathological changes after intratracheal LPS instillation and CS exposure.
| Groups | Dose (mg/kg) | Scores (means ± SEM) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | – | 0.9 ± 0.2 |
| Model | – | 3.0 ± 0.4△△ |
| DXM | 1.0 | 1.6 ± 0.3** |
| TA-H | 50.0 | 2.0 ± 0.2* |
| TA-M | 25.0 | 1.8 ± 0.3* |
| TA-L | 10.0 | 1.7 ± 0.3* |
| Sch | 3.0 | 2.0 ± 0.2* |
| Epi | 3.0 | 2.2 ± 0.2 |
| Val | 3.0 | 2.3 ± 0.4 |
| Pic | 5.0 | 2.0 ± 0.3* |
Note: Semi-quantitative analyses of inflammatory cell infiltrations in lung sections were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Lung tissues were fixed, sectioned at 5 µm, and stained with H&E for tissue neutrophils infiltration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences are represented as △△p < 0.01 vs. control, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model (n = 10 mice per group).