| Literature DB >> 35744169 |
Patrick Rider1,2, Željka Perić Kačarević1,2,3, Akiva Elad2, Daniel Rothamel4, Gerrit Sauer4, Fabien Bornert5, Peter Windisch6, Dávid Hangyási6, Balint Molnar6, Bernhard Hesse7, Michel Assad8, Frank Witte1.
Abstract
Nowadays, the most commonly used fixation systems are non-resorbable, but new resorbable magnesium alloy fixation screws have been introduced recently. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the magnesium fixation screw and the commonly used non-resorbable titanium screw in an animal model. Four 3-wall defect sites were covered with collagen membranes in the mandible of twenty beagle dogs (two sites on the left and two on the right). Each membrane was fixed with either four magnesium screws or four titanium screws. Post-operative follow-up revealed the expected observations such as transient inflammation and pain. Both groups showed a good healing response, with no differences between groups. Micro-CT analysis showed no significant difference between groups in terms of BV/TV or soft tissue volume. The void volume in the magnesium fixation screw group continued to decrease on average between the different timepoints, but not significantly. Furthermore, a gradual progression of the degradation process of the magnesium screws was observed in the same group. Magnesium screws and titanium screws showed equal performance in tissue regeneration according to GBR principles. An additional advantage of magnesium screws is their resorbable nature, which eliminates the need for a second surgical step to remove the screws.Entities:
Keywords: beagle dog model GBR; degradation; healing; magnesium fixation screws; micro-CT
Year: 2022 PMID: 35744169 PMCID: PMC9229971 DOI: 10.3390/ma15124111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Representative surgical photos for the implantation of (a) the magnesium fixation screw and (b) the titanium fixation screw, when used to fixate a collagen membrane in a GBR procedure in the lower left jaw in beagle dogs. In both images, two treatment sites are partially visible. The magnesium screws (indicated by the blue arrows) appear black due to their magnesium fluoride surface, whereas the titanium screws appear silver shiny (indicated by the red arrows).
Figure 2Demonstration of the workflow to obtain the volume and surface area values for each of the implanted screws (3.5 mm in length). µCT scans were taken from the one-week timepoint and show that the magnesium fixations screws remain largely intact. (a) µCT of defect; (b) Location of the magnesium fixation screws identified; (c) Extraction of screw volumes after alignment and segmentation.
Figure 3µCT measured values of (a) new bone volume/total defect volume, (b) soft tissue volume, and (c) total void (gas cavity) volume in the defect. Results shown are for defects treated with a bovine bone graft and a collagen membrane fixated with either magnesium (blue) or titanium (red) fixation screws. At each timepoint in (a,b), there are no significant differences between each treatment group. In (c), there are no significant differences between each sequential timepoint. Error bars show the standard deviation in (a) and the range in (b,c). p values are represented on the figures as follows: p < 0.05: *, p < 0.01: **, and p < 0.001: ***.
µCT volume measurements for treated GBR defects covered with a collagen barrier membrane that is fixated with either magnesium or titanium fixation screws.
| Week | Fixation Screw | No. of Treated Defects | Volume | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Defect (TV) (mm3) | New Bone (BV) (mm3) | Soft Tissue | BV/TV | Void Space | |||
| 1 | Magnesium | 12 | 81.0 ± 5 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 51 ± 5.5 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 2 ± 3.5 |
| Titanium | 12 | 84.0 ± 8 | 1 ± 1 | 52.5 ± 5.5 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | / | |
| 8 | Magnesium | 12 | 73 ± 6.5 | 18 ± 3 | 39 ± 8 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 1 ± 1.50 |
| Titanium | 12 | 71.5 ± 5 | 20.5 ± 3 | 33.5 ± 4.5 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | / | |
| 16 | Magnesium | 12 | 76.5 ± 8 | 31.5 ± 8.5 | 30 ± 8 | 0.41 ± 0.10 | 0.5 ± 1.5 |
| Titanium | 12 | 72 ± 8 | 30.5 ± 3.5 | 25.5 ± 6 | 0.43 ± 0.06 | / | |
| 52 | Magnesium | 4 | 66.50 ± 18 | 31 ± 19 | 23 ± 6.5 | 0.43 ± 0.17 | 0 ± 0.5 |
| Titanium | 4 | 68 ± 9 | 29 ± 9 | 24.5 ± 3.5 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | / | |
Figure 4Reconstructed µCT images showing the residual metallic magnesium. The 3D structure of the remaining magnesium metal has been extracted from the µCT data and presented for each timepoint. Due to the small size and few samples with remaining magnesium metal (3 samples with remnants out of 16 samples) at the 52-week timepoint, the residual 3D metallic structure of the screw could not be recreated. Mineralized magnesium degradation products can be seen retaining a partial shape of the degraded fixation screw.
Figure 5Box and whisker diagrams for the magnesium screw: (a) total volume, (b) surface area, and (c) the ratio of surface area/ total volume, after implantation in a GBR setting in beagle dogs. The whiskers indicate the range of data. p values are represented on the figures as follows: p < 0.001: ***.