Literature DB >> 23205918

Rehabilitation of deficient alveolar ridges using titanium grids before and simultaneously with implant placement: a systematic review.

Laura Ricci1, Vittoria Perrotti, Lorenzo Ravera, Antonio Scarano, Adriano Piattelli, Giovanna Iezzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of titanium grids for implant surgery before and simultaneously with implant placement and to assess the success rate of the procedure, as well as survival and success rates of implants placed in the regenerated areas.
METHODS: Medline was used to identify studies in English published from 1996 to 2011. An additional hand search was performed of the relevant journals and of the bibliographies of the papers identified. Articles retrieved by two independent authors were screened using specific inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and prospective clinical studies regarding vertical and/or horizontal regeneration of the alveolar ridge using titanium grids, in association or not with biomaterials, before and simultaneously with implant placement.
RESULTS: Six articles were selected, including a total of 79 patients, 87 titanium grids, and 141 implants. Twenty-four implants were placed simultaneously with titanium grids, and 117 implants were inserted after a period of 4 to 9 months. Titanium grids in combination with autogenous bone were used in 43 cases, 25 in combination with a mixture of autogenous bone and bone substitutes, 14 in association with bone substitutes, five using only titanium grids. The overall success rate of the regenerative procedures was 98.86%; the overall survival and success rates of implants were 100% and 93.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The main limit of the present systematic review is the scarcity of papers with an adequate and consistent methodology regarding the data collection and analysis and the lack of RCTs and large well-designed long-term trials. Survival and success rates of implants placed in the areas treated with titanium grids were comparable to those of implants placed in native, non-regenerated bone and of implants placed in bone regenerated with resorbable and non-resorbable membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23205918     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2012.120314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  10 in total

1.  Biodegradation of a Magnesium Alloy Fixation Screw Used in a Guided Bone Regeneration Model in Beagle Dogs.

Authors:  Patrick Rider; Željka Perić Kačarević; Akiva Elad; Daniel Rothamel; Gerrit Sauer; Fabien Bornert; Peter Windisch; Dávid Hangyási; Balint Molnar; Bernhard Hesse; Michel Assad; Frank Witte
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Analysis of a Pure Magnesium Membrane Degradation Process and Its Functionality When Used in a Guided Bone Regeneration Model in Beagle Dogs.

Authors:  Patrick Rider; Željka Perić Kačarević; Akiva Elad; Daniel Rothamel; Gerrit Sauer; Fabien Bornert; Peter Windisch; Dávid Hangyási; Balint Molnar; Bernhard Hesse; Frank Witte
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Bone regeneration in aesthetic areas using titanium micromesh. Three case reports.

Authors:  A Scarano; B Assenza; A DI Cerbo; V Candotto; P Santos DE Oliveira; F Lorusso
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

4.  Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study.

Authors:  Raquel Zita Gomes; Andres Paraud Freixas; Chang-Hun Han; Sohueil Bechara; Isaac Tawil
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchi; Elisabetta Vignudelli; Aldo Napolitano; Claudio Marchetti; Giuseppe Corinaldesi
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 6.  Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited.

Authors:  Ibrahim Elgali; Omar Omar; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.612

Review 7.  Titanium mesh for bone augmentation in oral implantology: current application and progress.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Songhang Li; Tianxu Zhang; Chao Wang; Xiaoxiao Cai
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.344

8.  Biodegradable magnesium barrier membrane used for guided bone regeneration in dental surgery.

Authors:  Patrick Rider; Željka Perić Kačarević; Akiva Elad; Drazen Tadic; Daniel Rothamel; Gerrit Sauer; Fabien Bornert; Peter Windisch; Dávid Botond Hangyási; Balint Molnar; Emely Bortel; Bernhard Hesse; Frank Witte
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-11-29

9.  3D-based buccal augmentation for ideal prosthetic implant alignment-an optimized method and report on 7 cases with pronounced buccal concavities.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Nickenig; Maximilian Riekert; Matthias Zirk; Max-Philipp Lentzen; Joachim E Zöller; Matthias Kreppel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.606

10.  A Preshaped Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Equine-Derived Bone Graft in a Posterior Mandibular Bone Defect: A Case Report.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Gianbattista Greco; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.