| Literature DB >> 35743861 |
Vladimir G Druzhinin1, Elizaveta D Baranova1, Ludmila V Matskova2,3, Pavel S Demenkov4, Valentin P Volobaev5, Varvara I Minina1, Alexey V Larionov1, Snezana A Paradnikova1.
Abstract
Coal worker's pneumoconiosis (CWP) is an occupationally induced progressive fibrotic lung disease. This irreversible but preventable disease currently affects millions across the world, mainly in countries with developed coal mining industries. Here, we report a pilot study that explores the sputum microbiome as a potential non-invasive bacterial biomarker of CWP status. Sputum samples were collected from 35 former and active coal miners diagnosed with CWP and 35 healthy controls. Sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes was used to study the taxonomic composition of the respiratory microbiome. There was no difference in alpha diversity between CWP and controls. The structure of bacterial communities in sputum samples (β diversity) differed significantly between cases and controls (pseudo-F = 3.61; p = 0.004). A significant increase in the abundance of Streptococcus (25.12 ± 11.37 vs. 16.85 ± 11.35%; p = 0.0003) was detected in samples from CWP subjects as compared to controls. The increased representation of Streptococcus in sputum from CWP patients was associated only with the presence of occupational pulmonary fibrosis, but did not depend on age, and did not differ between former and current miners. The study shows, for the first time, that the sputum microbiota of CWP subjects differs from that of controls. The results of our present exploratory study warrant further investigations on a larger cohort.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA genes; Streptococcus; coal worker’s pneumoconiosis; lung fibrosis; next-generation sequencing; sputum microbiome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35743861 PMCID: PMC9224638 DOI: 10.3390/life12060830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Characteristics of the study cohorts.
| Variables | Coal Worker’s Pneumoconiosis, | Healthy Kemerovo Residents (Control), |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) (mean ± SD) | 58.5 ± 8.3 | 55.7 ± 11.7 |
| Stage of CWP (%): | - | |
| I | 88.6 | |
| II | 11.4 | |
| Respiratory symptoms (%): | ||
| Cough | 22.9 | 8.6 |
| Dyspnea | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Chronic diseases (%): | ||
| Heart and vessels | 34.3 | 34.3 |
| Bronchitis | 14.3 | 5.7 |
| Stomach | 14.3 | 11.4 |
| Diabetes | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Obesity | 5.7 | 2.9 |
| Living environment (%): | ||
| City | 94.3 | 91.4 |
| Village | 5.7 | 8.6 |
| Coal dust occupational exposure (%): | ||
| Current miners | 23.0 | |
| Former miners | 77.0 | - |
| Smoking status (%): | ||
| Non-smokers | 97.1 | 94.3 |
| Smokers | 2.9 | 5.7 |
| Alcohol status (%): | ||
| Non-drinker | 14.3 | 20.0 |
| Rare drinker | 77.1 | 48.5 |
| Medium drinker | 8.6 | 31.5 |
| Diet (%): | ||
| Vegetarian | 0 | 0 |
| Non-vegetarian | 100 | 100 |
Figure 1Taxonomic structure of the sputum microbiomes from CWP subjects and controls at the phyla level.
Average percentage abundance of phyla present in «core» microbiome.
| Phyla | Controls, | CWP, | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 47.46 ± 11.25 | 50.41 ± 14.1 | 0.39 |
|
| 22.93 ± 10.88 | 19.83 ± 11.51 | 0.29 |
|
| 10.1 ± 7.91 | 8.99 ± 5.76 | 0.85 |
|
| 8.24 ± 6.54 | 11.45 ± 16.56 | 0.9 |
|
| 6.98 ± 4.45 | 4.56 ± 3.96 | 0.02 |
|
| 1.8 ± 1.68 | 1.53 ± 1.84 | 0.44 |
|
| 0.53 ± 0.96 | 0.6 ± 0.99 | 0.53 |
|
| 0.18 ± 0.74 | 0.23 ± 0.41 | 0.1 |
Figure 2Two-dimensional diagram constructed by the method of principal components analysis demonstrating the phylogenetic similarity of prokaryotic sputum communities in CWP subjects and controls.
Average percentage abundance of genera present in «core» microbiome.
| Genus | Controls | CWP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
|
| 16.85 ± 11.35 | 25.12 ± 11.37 | 0.0003 * | 0.0023 |
| 15.36 ± 7.83 | 13.24 ± 8.06 | >0.05 | 0.0114 | |
|
| 15.4 ± 11.82 | 12.03 ± 10.14 | >0.05 | 0.0136 |
|
| 15.36 ± 11.86 | 11.56 ± 10.18 | >0.05 | 0.0159 |
|
| 4.6 ± 4.39 | 2.07 ± 2.1 | 0.02 | 0.0045 |
|
| 3.28 ± 3.5 | 3.26 ± 5.84 | >0.05 | 0.0182 |
|
| 5.95 ± 6.75 | 4.24 ± 3.23 | >0.05 | 0.0205 |
|
| 2.46 ± 1.43 | 1.45 ± 1.6 | >0.05 | 0.0227 |
|
| 2.2 ± 2.29 | 2.78 ± 2.92 | >0.05 | 0.0250 |
|
| 2.98 ± 2.99 | 2.3 ± 2.88 | >0.05 | 0.0273 |
|
| 3.04 ± 3.01 | 2.34 ± 2.74 | >0.05 | 0.0295 |
|
| 1.01 ± 1.39 | 1.71 ± 1.68 | 0.03 | 0.0068 |
|
| 2.03 ± 1.93 | 3.12 ± 2.19 | >0.05 | 0.0318 |
|
| 2.27 ± 3.02 | 2.65 ± 3.05 | >0.05 | 0.0341 |
|
| 1.67 ± 1.7 | 2.67 ± 2.19 | 0.04 | 0.0091 |
|
| 1.41 ± 1.91 | 1.43 ± 1.39 | >0.05 | 0.0364 |
|
| 2.34 ± 1.21 | 3.27 ± 2.35 | >0.05 | 0.0386 |
|
| 1.91 ± 1.82 | 1.65 ± 1.42 | >0.05 | 0.0409 |
|
| 2.01 ± 2.58 | 1.37 ± 2.58 | >0.05 | 0.0432 |
|
| 3.83 ± 4.91 | 4.72 ± 12.27 | >0.05 | 0.0454 |
|
| 1.15 ± 1.6 | 0.82 ± 1.78 | >0.05 | 0.0477 |
|
| 1.17 ± 1.69 | 0.99 ± 1.41 | >0.05 | 0.0500 |
Note: * p Value lesser than FDR corrected p.
Figure 3Barplots representing the effect size for particular taxa in sputum samples in the CWP and control groups. LDA-linear discriminant analysis.
Average percentage abundance of species present in «core» microbiome.
| Species | Controls | CWP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
|
| 16.93 ± 10.92 | 25.32 ± 11.55 | 0.0002 * | 0.0016 |
|
| 14.27 ± 12.03 | 11.5 ± 10.22 | >0.05 | 0.0048 |
|
| 4.28 ± 4.28 | 1.98 ± 1.99 | 0.03 | 0.0032 |
|
| 2.35 ± 2.87 | 1.66 ± 1.71 | >0.05 | 0.0065 |
|
| 1.44 ± 1.92 | 2.64 ± 3.33 | >0.05 | 0.0081 |
|
| 4.51 ± 5.78 | 2.19 ± 1.67 | >0.05 | 0.0097 |
|
| 1.63 ± 1.54 | 1.69 ± 1.66 | >0.05 | 0.0113 |
|
| 1.41 ± 1.91 | 1.44 ± 1.38 | >0.05 | 0.0129 |
|
| 1.54 ± 1.96 | 0.92 ± 1.74 | >0.05 | 0.0145 |
|
| 1.84 ± 2.56 | 2.44 ± 2.97 | >0.05 | 0.0161 |
|
| 1.93 ± 2.43 | 1.38 ± 2.59 | >0.05 | 0.0177 |
|
| 1.25 ± 1.58 | 0.75 ± 1.56 | >0.05 | 0.0194 |
|
| 0.52 ± 1.08 | 0.7 ± 1.27 | >0.05 | 0.0210 |
|
| 0.56 ± 0.74 | 0.55 ± 0.63 | >0.05 | 0.0226 |
|
| 0.44 ± 1.01 | 0.48 ± 0.7 | >0.05 | 0.0242 |
|
| 0.37 ± 0.61 | 0.22 ± 0.39 | >0.05 | 0.0258 |
|
| 0.61 ± 1.09 | 0.43 ± 0.58 | >0.05 | 0.0274 |
|
| 0.23 ± 0.3 | 0.29 ± 0.43 | >0.05 | 0.0290 |
|
| 0.22 ± 0.5 | 0.32 ± 0.56 | >0.05 | 0.0306 |
|
| 0.67 ± 1.42 | 1.49 ± 5.07 | >0.05 | 0.0323 |
|
| 0.5 ± 1.27 | 0.31 ± 0.65 | >0.05 | 0.0339 |
|
| 0.27 ± 0.8 | 0.26 ± 0.73 | >0.05 | 0.0355 |
|
| 0.3 ± 0.87 | 0.29 ± 0.43 | >0.05 | 0.0371 |
|
| 0.27 ± 0.64 | 0.2 ± 0.53 | >0.05 | 0.0387 |
|
| 0.2 ± 0.54 | 0.23 ± 0.49 | >0.05 | 0.0403 |
|
| 0.11 ± 0.24 | 0.07 ± 0.22 | >0.05 | 0.0419 |
|
| 0.39 ± 0.61 | 0.13 ± 0.27 | >0.05 | 0.0435 |
|
| 0.1 ± 0.25 | 0.14 ± 0.31 | > 0.05 | 0.0452 |
|
| 0.09 ± 0.43 | 0.11 ± 0.62 | >0.05 | 0.0468 |
|
| 0.32 ± 0.78 | 0.13 ± 0.2 | >0.05 | 0.0484 |
|
| 0.08 ± 0.2 | 0.11 ± 0.24 | >0.05 | 0.0500 |
Note: * p Value lesser than FDR corrected p.