| Literature DB >> 35743832 |
Daniela Monti1,2, Silvia Tampucci1,2, Valentina Paganini1, Susi Burgalassi1,2, Patrizia Chetoni1,2, Jordi Galván3, Francesco Celandroni4, Emilia Ghelardi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis produces nail chromatic alterations that lead patients to mask them with cosmetic enamels.Entities:
Keywords: antimycotic activity; bovine hoof membranes; breathable cosmetic polish; ciclopirox; nail lacquer; onychomycosis; transungual permeation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35743832 PMCID: PMC9225083 DOI: 10.3390/life12060801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Bovine hoof membranes before (A) and after (B) treatment with commercial breathable cosmetic nail polish (red color).
Permeation parameters of CPX through bovine hoof membranes (flux, lag time, and amount of drug permeated at the end of permeation experiment, 96 h, Q96h) by using Type A protocol (mean ES, n = 6).
| Membrane | CPX-HPCH Nail Lacquer | Flux | Lag Time | Q96h | Experimental Procedure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No cosmetic polish | Once a day | 5.18 ± 1.39 | 22.88 ± 0.91 | 379.10 ± 101.8 | Type A |
| BreathCOSM, 1 coat | Once a day | 2.55 ± 0.22 | 20.28 ± 1.18 | 195.7 0 ± 15.69 | Type A |
Figure 2Permeation plot of CPX through bovine hoof membranes after application once a day of CPX-HPCH nail lacquer on the nail, pre-covered or not with commercial breathable cosmetic nail polish, by using Type A protocol.
Minimal inhibitory volumes required to inhibit Trichophyton Rubrum and Candida parapsilosis growth when CPX-HPCH nail lacquer was applied once a day on the bovine hoof membrane coated with commercial breathable cosmetic nail polish by using experimental conditions of Test A.
| Collection Time (h) | Minimal Inhibitory Volume, µL | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| 6 | 100 | 100 |
| 20 | 25 | 25 |
| 24 | 25 | 50 |
| 30 | 25 | 25 |
| 44 | 25 | 25 |
| 48 | 25 | 25 |
| 54 | 25 | 25 |
| 68 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
| 72 | 25 | 25 |
| 78 | 25 | 12.5 |
| 92 | 25 | 6.25 |
| 96 | 25 | 25 |
Efficacy index of CPX after application once a day of CPX-HPCH nail lacquer on the nail, pre-covered or not with commercial breathable cosmetic nail polish, by using Type A protocol (mean ±SE, n = 6).
| Membrane Treatment | CPX-HPCH Nail Lacquer |
|
| Experimental Procedure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No cosmetic polish | Once a day | 19.89 ± 5.35 | 39.84 ± 10.71 | Type A |
| BreathCOSM,1 coat | Once a day | 9.78 ± 0.85 | 19.58 ± 1.70 | Type A |
Permeation parameters of CPX through bovine hoof membranes (flux, lag time, and amount of drug permeated at the end of permeation experiment, 96 h, Q96h) by using Type B protocol (mean ± ES, n = 6).
| Membrane Treatment | CPX-HPCH Nail Lacquer | Flux, J, | Lag Time, | Q96h | Experimental Procedure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No cosmetic polish | Once a day | 4.37 ± 0.58 | 14.66 ± 2.96 | 352.70 ± 42.35 | Type B |
| BreathCOSM, 1 coat | Twice daily | 4.97 ± 1.28 | 20.19 ± 1.03 | 375.0 ± 94.65 | Type B |
Figure 3Permeation plot of CPX through bovine hoof membranes protocol after application twice a day of CPX-HPCH NL on the nail pre-covered with commercial breathable cosmetic nail polish compared to the application of CPX-HPCH NL once a day directly on the nail by using Type B protocol.
Efficacy index of ciclopirox after application twice a day of CPX-HPCH NL on the nail pre-covered with commercial breathable cosmetic nail polish compared to the application of CPX-HPCH NL once a day directly on the nail by using Type B protocol (mean ± SE, n = 6).
| Membrane Treatment | CPX-HPCH Nail Lacquer |
|
| Experimental Procedure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No cosmetic polish | Once a day | 16.77 ± 2.21 | 33.58 ± 4.43 | Type B |
| BreathCOSM, 1 coat | Twice daily | 19.09 ± 4.90 | 38.22 ± 9.82 | Type B |
Experimental conditions of the studies performed by the different research groups on amorolfine, efinaconazole, and tavaborole.
| StudyType | Medicated NL Application | Treatment | Influence of Activity | Cosmetic Layer Appearance | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Cosmetic NP | After CosmeticNP | |||||
| Amorolfine 5% | ||||||
| In vivo | 24 h | - | 12 weeks | No difference in antimycotic activity | - | [ |
| In vitro | 24 h | - | Immediately after drying | No difference in | - | [ |
| In vitro | 10 min | - | Immediately after drying | No difference in | - | [ |
| Efinaconazole 10% | ||||||
| In vitro | daily | 7 days | No difference in | Loss of color and stickiness after repeated application | [ | |
| In vitro | daily | 7 days | - | Discoloration | [ | |
| In vivo | daily | 52 weeks | No differences in | Discoloration | [ | |
| Tavaborole 5% | ||||||
| In vitro | daily | 20 days | No difference in | [ | ||
| In vitro | daily | 7 days | - | No discoloration | [ | |
NL: nail lacquer; NP: nail polish.