| Literature DB >> 31332076 |
Daniela Monti1, Diletta Mazzantini2, Silvia Tampucci3, Alessandra Vecchione2, Francesco Celandroni2, Susi Burgalassi1, Emilia Ghelardi2.
Abstract
Onychomycosis is a nail fungal infection, mostly caused by dermatophytes. The treatment efficacy is impaired by difficulties of reaching effective drug levels at the site of infection; frequent relapses occur after cessation of antifungal therapy. The aim of the study was to compare two commercial products containing ciclopirox or efinaconazole for antimycotic activity and antifungal drug resistance. A study of permeation and penetration through bovine hoof membranes, as a nail model, was performed to evaluate the antimycotic activity of permeates against clinical isolates of selected fungi, and the frequency of spontaneous in vitro Trichophyton rubrum-resistant strains was assessed by broth microdilution assays. The results suggest that ciclopirox creates a depot in the nail, leading to a gradual release of the drug over time with action on both the nail plate and bed. Conversely, efinaconazole, mildly interacting with nail keratin, mainly exerts its antifungal activity in the nail bed. However, in the case of T. rubrum, the antifungal activities of the drugs in the nail plate seem comparable. Finally, efinaconazole showed a potential for induction of resistance in T. rubrum, which may limit its efficacy over time. Ciclopirox did not show any potential to induce resistance in T. rubrum and appears endowed with a more complete activity than efinaconazole in the management of onychomycosis as the nail keratin is a substrate for the growth of fungal cells, and the availability of drug in large concentration just in the nail bed may not be sufficient to guarantee the complete eradication of pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Trichophyton rubrumzzm321990; antifungal resistance; bovine hoof membranes; ciclopirox; efinaconazole; transungual permeation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31332076 PMCID: PMC6761538 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00442-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1Permeation profiles of ciclopirox (CPX/HPCH) and efinaconazole (EFI formulation) through bovine hoof membranes as a model of human nail permeation.
Permeation/penetration parameters of the drugs through and into bovine hoof membranes
| Parameter | Value for the parameter | |
|---|---|---|
| CPX/HPCH solution (8% CPX) | EFI formulation (10% EFI) | |
| 4.92 ± 0.89 | 0.58 ± 0.09 | |
| Lag time (h) | 1.54 ± 0.83 | 11.03 ± 0.97 |
| 61.46 ± 11.08 | 5.82 ± 0.97 | |
| 3.29 ± 0.67 | 0.24 ± 0.05 | |
| 3.37 ± 0.39 | 0.063 ± 0.01 | |
| 1.32 ± 0.24 | 0.02 ± 0.005 | |
J, steady-state flux; Papp, apparent permeability coefficient; Q, amount of permeant diffusing across the area.
Values were determined after application of 75 μl of the tested formulations at 30 h (means ± standard errors; n = 6). Values for CPX/HPCH solution were significantly different from those for the EFI formulation (P < 0.05).
Ciclopirox and efinaconazole subungual fluid concentrations in the experimental samples
| Sample | Time (h) | CPX concn (mg/liter) | EFI concn (mg/liter) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| B | 8 | 5.2 | 1.1 |
| C | 12 | 5.5 | 1.1 |
| D | 16 | 5.4 | 1.2 |
| E | 20 | 5.0 | 1.3 |
| F | 24 | 3.3 | 1.0 |
| G | 28 | 3.0 | 0.9 |
Minimal inhibitory volume of subungual fluid obtained after application of CPX/HPCH solution and EFI formulation against three fungal strains for each species
| Collection time (h) | Minimal inhibitory vol (μl) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPX | EFI | CPX | EFI | CPX | EFI | |
| 4 | 100 | 25 | 6.25, 6.25, 12.5 | 6.25, 6.25, 12.5 | 25, 25, 50 | 12.5, 12.5, 25 |
| 8 | 100 | 50 | 6.25, 12.5, 12.5 | 6.25, 12.5, 12.5 | 25, 50, 100 | 25, 25, 50 |
| 12 | 100 | 50 | 12.5, 25, 25 | 6.25, 12.5, 12.5 | 25, 50, 100 | 25, 25, 50 |
| 16 | 100 | 50 | 12.5, 25, 50 | 6.25, 12.5, 12.5 | 50, 50, 100 | 12.5, 25, 50 |
| 20 | 100 | 12.5, 12.5, 25 | 25, 25, 50 | 6.25, 12.5, 12.5 | 100 | 12.5, 25, 50 |
| 24 | 100 | 12.5, 25, 25 | 25, 50, 50 | 6.25, 12.5, 25 | 100 | 25, 50, 50 |
| 28 | 100 | 25, 25, 50 | 50 | 6.25, 12.5, 25 | 100 | 25, 50, 50 |
In the case all strains in a species are inhibited by the same amount of subungual fluid, only one value is reported. Mode values of six different experiments are given. CPX, CPX/HPCH solution; EFI, EFI formulation.
Significant difference from the MIC value.
FIG 2Effectiveness factors (EF1 and EF2) related to ciclopirox (CPX) and efinaconazole (EFI) from CPX/HPCH solution and EFI formulation, respectively. Values are means ± standard errors of the means. *, statistically significant differences. (Top) EF1, the ratio of the drug retained in the membrane at the end of the permeation experiment to the MIC. (Bottom) EF2, ratio of apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) to the MIC.
Spontaneous drug-resistant T. rubrum mutants obtained following direct selection on plates containing inhibitory drug concentrations
| Strain and drug | Total no. of CFU plated | No. of resistant colonies | Resistance frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATCC 28188 | |||
| Efinaconazole | 2.25 × 108 | 8 | 3.5 × 10-8 |
| Ciclopirox | 4.2 × 108 | 0 | <2.4 × 10-9 |
| ATCC MYA-4438 | |||
| Efinaconazole | 1.6 × 108 | 4 | 2.5 × 10-8 |
| Ciclopirox | 1.6 × 108 | 0 | <6.2 × 10-9 |
| CI-1 | |||
| Efinaconazole | 3.0 × 108 | 1 | 3.3 × 10-9 |
| Ciclopirox | 3.0 × 108 | 0 | <3.3 × 10-9 |
| CI-2 | |||
| Efinaconazole | 4.5 × 108 | 9 | 2.0 × 10-8 |
| Ciclopirox | 4.5 × 108 | 0 | <2.2 × 10-9 |
Resistance frequency data were calculated by dividing the number of CFU grown on the plates containing each drug by the total number of CFU spread on plates.
In vitro evolution of drug resistance in T. rubrum following exposure to subinhibitory drug concentrations for 5 or 10 transfers before selection
| Strain and no. of transfers | Resistance frequency | |
|---|---|---|
| Efinaconazole | Ciclopirox | |
| ATCC 28188 | ||
| 5 | 7.21 × 10-8 | <5.24 × 10-9 |
| 10 | 6.92 × 10-7 | <6.75 × 10-10 |
| ATCC MYA-4438 | ||
| 5 | 1.7 × 10-8 | <2 × 10-9 |
| 10 | 1.25 × 10-7 | <1.62 × 10-9 |
| CI-1 | ||
| 5 | <9.8 × 10-8 | <4.4 × 10-9 |
| 10 | 1.2 × 10-8 | <2.75 × 10-9 |
| CI-2 | ||
| 5 | 9.37 × 10-9 | <5 × 10-8 |
| 10 | 2.18 × 10-7 | <1.19 × 10-8 |
Resistance frequency data were calculated by dividing the number of CFU grown on the plates containing each drug by the total number of CFU spread on plates.
MIC values of randomly selected induced T. rubrum mutants obtained by the microtiter broth dilution methodology
| Parent strain and mutant type | MIC (mg/liter) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efinaconazole | Ciclopirox | Itraconazole | Amorolfine | ||
| ATCC 28188 | |||||
| S | 4 | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
| I | 5 | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
| 1 | 0.02 | NS | NS | NS | |
| 1 | 0.039 | NS | 0.312 | NS | |
| MYA | |||||
| S | 1 | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
| 1 | 0.039 | NS | NS | NS | |
| I | 5 | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
| 1 | 0.01 | NS | 0.312 | NS | |
| CI-1 | |||||
| S | 1 | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
| I | 2 | 0.01 | NS | 0.312 | NS |
| 1 | 0.02 | NS | 0.312 | NS | |
| CI-2 | |||||
| S | 5 | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
| I | 6 | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
| 1 | 0.02 | NS | 0.312 | NS | |
S, spontaneous resistance; I, induced resistance.
n, number of strains.
Mode values of six different experiments are shown. MIC differences of ±1 2-fold dilution were considered not significant (NS).