| Literature DB >> 35743537 |
Catherine Strittmatter1,2, Lukas Meyer3, Gabriel Broocks3, Maria Alexandrou2, Maria Politi2,4, Maria Boutchakova2, Andreas Henssler1, Marcus Reinges1, Andreas Simgen5, Panagiotis Papanagiotou2,6, Christian Roth2.
Abstract
Previous case series have described the safety and efficacy of different stent models for stent-assisted aneurysm coiling (SAC), but comparative analyses of procedural results are limited. This study investigates the procedural outcome and safety of three different stent models (Atlas™, LEO+™ (Baby) and Enterprise™) in the setting of elective SAC treated at a tertiary neuro-endovascular center. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutively treated patients that received endovascular SAC for intracranial aneurysms between 1 July 2013 and 31 March 2020, excluding all emergency angiographies for acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. The primary procedural outcome was the occlusion rate evaluated with the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) assessed on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Safety assessment included periprocedural adverse events (i.e., symptomatic ischemic complications, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, iatrogenic perforation, dissection, or aneurysm rupture and in-stent thrombosis) and in-house mortality. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify patient baseline and aneurysm characteristics that were associated with complete aneurysm obliteration at follow-up. A total of 156 patients undergoing endovascular treatment via SAC met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 62 years (IQR, 55-71), and 73.7% (115) of patients were female. At first follow-up (6-month) and last available follow-up (12 and 18 months), complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 78.3% (90) and 76.9% (102) of patients, respectively. There were no differences regarding the occlusion rates stratified by stent model. Multivariable logistic analysis revealed increasing dome/neck ratio (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.26.; 95% CI, 0.11-0.64; p = 0.003), increasing neck size (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.96; p = 0.027), and female sex (aOR, 4.37; 95% CI, 1.68-11.36; p = 0.002) as independently associated with treatment success. This study showed comparable rates of complete long-term aneurysm obliteration and safety following SAC for intracranial aneurysm with three different stent-models highlighting the procedural feasibility of this treatment strategy with currently available stent-models. Increased neck size and a higher dome/neck ratio were independent variables associated with less frequent complete aneurysm obliteration.Entities:
Keywords: endovascular treatment; interventional devices; intracranial aneurysms
Year: 2022 PMID: 35743537 PMCID: PMC9225175 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Baseline characteristics and anatomical aneurysm details grouped by stent model.
| Baseline Characteristics | All Patients | LEO+ | Enterprise | Atlas | P1 | P2 | P3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 156) | (n = 93) | (n = 19) | (n = 44) | ||||
| ▪ Age, years; median (IQR) | 62 (55–71) | 62 (56–73) | 59 (48–67) | 61 (53.5–68) | 0.235 | 0.276 | 0.549 |
| ▪ Female sex, % (n) | 73.7 (115) | 72 (67) | 73.7 (14) | 77.3 (34) | 0.884 | 0.516 | 0.759 |
| ▪ Arterial hypertension, % (n) | 45.5 (71) | 47.3 (44) | 47.4 (9) | 59.1 (26) | 0.996 | 0.197 | 0.390 |
| ▪ History of multiple Aneurysms, % (n) | 44.9 (70) | 51.6 (48) | 21.1 (4) | 40.9 (18) | 0.015 * | 0.242 | 0.129 |
| ▪ Incidental | 82 (128) | 75.3 (70) | 73.7 (14) | 90.9 (40) | |||
| ▪ Previously treated | 19.9 (31) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - Clipped | 1.3 (2) | 2.2 (2) | - | - | - | - | - |
| - Coiled | 18.6 (29) | 21.5 (20) | 26.3 (5) | 9.1 (4) | - | - | - |
| ▪ Anterior circulation | 85.3 (133) | 86 (80) | 94.7 (18) | 79.5 (5) | 0.457 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| - Internal carotid artery | 20.5 (32) | 19.4 (18) | 21.1 (4) | 22.7 (10) | - | - | - |
| - Middle cerebral artery | 41.7 (65) | 45.2 (42) | 31.6 (6) | 38.6 (17) | - | - | - |
| - Anterior communicating artery | 19.9 (31) | 19.4 (18) | 42.1 (8) | 11.4 (5) | - | - | - |
| - Pericallosal artery | 3.2 (5) | 2.2 (2) | - | 6.8 (3) | - | - | - |
| ▪ Posterior circulation | 14.7 (23) | 14 (13) | 5.3 (1) | 20.5 (9) | 0.457 | 0.332 | 0.258 |
| - Vertebral artery | 1.9 (3) | 3.2 (2) | - | - | - | - | - |
| - Posterior inferior cerebellar artery | 1.9 (3) | 3.2 (2) | - | - | - | - | - |
| - Basilar artery | 6.4 (10) | 2.2 (2) | - | 18.2 (8) | - | - | - |
| - Basilar tip | 3.8 (6) | 4.3 (3) | 5.3 (1) | 2.3 (1) | - | - | - |
| - Posterior cerebral artery | 0.6 (1) | 1.1 (1) | - | - | - | - | - |
| ▪ Dome | 5.9 (3) | 5.5 (2.7) | 5.5 (2.6) | 6.7 (3.7) | 0.969 | 0.049 | 0.109 |
| ▪ Neck | 4 (2.1) | 3.8 (2.1) | 3.7 (1.5) | 4.6 (2.4) | 0.901 | 0.109 | 0.214 |
| ▪ Dome/Neck ratio | 1.5 (0.57) | 1.5 (0.54) | 1.6 (0.83) | 1.5 (0.49) | 0.664 | 0.895 | 0.626 |
| ▪ Vessel diameter pre-target | 3 (0.78) | 2.9 (0.8) | 3 (0.5) | 3.1 (0.9) | 0.252 | 0.205 | 0.851 |
| ▪ Vessel diameter post-target | 2.4 (0.67) | 2.4 (0.7) | 2.4 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | 0.938 | 0.414 | 0.559 |
| Implanted number of coils | 6 (4–8) | 6 (3–8) | 7 (4–9) | 7 (4–9) | 0.544 | 0.084 | 0.741 |
Legend: * Indicating significance; p Values: P1: Leo vs. Enterprise; P2: Leo vs. Atlas; P3: Atlas vs. Enterprise.
Figure 1Rates of aneurysm obliteration assessed with Raymond–Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC) stratified by stent model and time of follow-up.
Procedural complications of all patients and grouped by stent model.
| Periprocedural Complications | All Patients | LEO+ | Enterprise | Atlas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % (n) | (n = 156) | (n = 93) | (n = 19) | (n = 44) |
|
| ||||
|
Iatrogenic dissection | 1.3 (2) | 2 | - | - |
|
Coil dislocation | 3.2 (5) | 2 | 2 | 1 |
|
| ||||
|
Ischemic lesions without clinical deficit * | 16 (25) | 7 | 2 | 16 |
|
In-stent thrombosis | 3.2 (5) | 4 | 1 | - |
|
ICH | 0.6 (1) | 1 | - | - |
|
sICH | 0.6 (1) | 1 | - | - |
|
SAH | 1.3 (2) | - | - | 2 |
|
In-stent intima hyperplasia # | 5.1 (8) | 6 | 2 | - |
|
In-stent stenosis # | 6.8 (9) | 7 | - | 2 |
|
| ||||
|
New disabling ischemic deficit * | 0.6 (1) | 1 | - | - |
|
In-hospital Mortality | 0.6 (1) | 1 | - | - |
Legend: SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; (s)ICH, (symptomatic) intracerebral hemorrhage. * Early in-hospital imaging. # At the time of follow-up.
Univariable logistic regression analysis for factors associated with complete aneurysm obliteration (Raymond–Roy occlusion class I) at first and last available follow-up.
| Univariable Logistic Regression Analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Follow-Up | Last Available Follow-Up | |||||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||
| Age | 1.0 | 0.96–1.04 | 0.942 | 0.99 | 0.9–1.03 | 0.851 |
| (years) | ||||||
| Sex | 5.9 | 2.26–15.32 | 0.001 * | 5 | 2.95–12.16 | 0.001 * |
| (female) | ||||||
| Aneurysm | 2.56 | 0.76–8.68 | 0.13 | 1.72 | 0.55–5.44 | 0.353 |
| location | ||||||
| (anterior) | ||||||
| Leo | 1.94 | 0.79–4.78 | 0.149 | 2.24 | 0.97–5.18 | 0.059 |
| (yes) | ||||||
| Atlas | 1.76 | 0.66–4.69 | 0.259 | 0.58 | 0.23–1.45 | 0.241 |
| (yes) | ||||||
| Enterprise | 0.66 | 0.19–2.30 | 0.511 | 0.51 | 0.17–1.151 | 0.224 |
| (yes) | ||||||
| Dome size (increasing) | 0.78 | 0.66–0.93 | 0.006 * | 0.75 | 0.63–0.89 | 0.001 * |
| Neck size | 0.73 | 0.56–0.95 | 0.021 * | 0.74 | 0.58–0.95 | 0.017 * |
| (increasing) | ||||||
| Dome/Neck Ratio | 0.61 | 0.29–1.27 | 0.187 | 0.45 | 0.22–9.23 | 0.029 * |
| (increasing) | ||||||
| Vessel diameter pre-target (increasing) | 0.41 | 0.22–0.77 | 0.006 * | 0.52 | 0.29–9.24 | 0.026 * |
| Vessel diameter post-target (increasing) | 0.707 | 0.37–1.35 | 0.292 | 0.75 | 0.41–1.41 | 0.376 |
Legend: * Indicating significance; OR = Odds ratio; CI = Confidence Intervals.
Figure 2Forest plot based on stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis for factors associated with complete aneurysm obliteration (Raymond–Roy occlusion class I) at last available follow-up assessed on digital subtraction angiography (DSA).