| Literature DB >> 35742739 |
Bo-Ram Kim1, Sunghwun Kang2,3, Woo-Suk Jeong4.
Abstract
An active lifestyle elicits many health benefits. This study's aim is to understand the actual of leisure time physical activity (LTPA) of female university students in Korea who are experiencing stress due to, e.g., study and employment. LTPA is the degree of exercise participation in leisure time; it is cardiovascular and strength-based behavior occurring within recreation, exercise or sport and provides a positive effect on life satisfaction and psychological well-being. LTPA has been recommended as a method of reducing menstrual symptom severity. However, a lack of evidence exists to support a clear relationship between LTPA and menstruation in female university students. Health consciousness (HC) refers to the degree of interest in one's health, and Korean female university students pay considerable attention to their body shape, diet habits, and LTPA. This study investigated female university students (K University in Gangwon-do, D University in Busan, and U University in Ulsan) in three metropolitan cities in Korea. Specifically, after seeking cooperation from the person in charge of each university, the purpose of this study was explained. In addition, after promising to provide coffee coupons to students who wish to respond to the survey, cooperation was sought in recruiting research subjects through the person in charge of each university. In addition, a total of 36 surveys that did not have contents filled in fully or gave inconsistent answers were excluded among all survey participants. Chi-square test, t-test and univariate one-way ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis were performed for between groups (HC, LTPA, intention to participate in LTPA). The LTPA results in relation to the menstruation patterns of Korean female college students are shown. First, there were no significant differences between menstruation (regular vs. irregular) and general LTPA during non-menstrual time periods (χ2 = 5.828, p < 0.212). However, female university students with regular menstruation patterns had higher LTPA after menstruation compared to female university students with irregular menstruation. Second, there were significant differences in the relationships among HC (p = 0.000), amount of LTPA (p = 0.002), and intention to perform LTPA (p = 0.002), according to the menstruation patterns (regular vs. irregular) of Korean female university students. In other words, those with regular menstruation patterns showed higher HC, amount of LTPA and intention to participate in LTPA than those with irregular menstruations. Third, there were significant differences in the relationship among HC (p = 0.000), amount of LTPA (p = 0.000), and intention to participate in LTPA (p = 0.000) according to LTPA of Korean female university students. Causation cannot be inferred from correlational studies. Therefore, female university students ultimately have different HC and participation in LTPA depending on menstruation regularity.Entities:
Keywords: amount of LTPA; health consciousness (HC); intention to LTPA; leisure-time physical activity (LTPA); menstruation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742739 PMCID: PMC9223730 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127492
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
The individual characteristics of the study subjects (N = 464).
| Variables | N (464) | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Menstruation | Regular | 288 | 62.1 | |
| Irregular | 176 | 37.9 | ||
| Age | 19s | 29 | 6.3 | |
| 20s | 161 | 34.7 | ||
| 21s | 109 | 23.5 | ||
| 22s | 94 | 20.3 | ||
| Over 23s | 71 | 15.2 | ||
| LTPA | Do not participate in LTPA | 129 | 27.8 | |
| Before menstruation | 99 | 21.3 | ||
| After menstruation | 134 | 28.9 | ||
| Always | 54 | 11.6 | ||
| When not menstruating | 48 | 10.3 | ||
| Amount of | Exercise | Do not participate in LTPA | 129 | 27.8 |
| Less than 6 months | 141 | 30.4 | ||
| 6 months~1 year | 50 | 10.8 | ||
| 1 year~2 years | 39 | 8.4 | ||
| Over 2 years | 105 | 22.6 | ||
| Exercise | Do not participate in LTPA | 129 | 27.8 | |
| 1 time | 80 | 17.2 | ||
| 2 times | 95 | 20.5 | ||
| 3 times | 87 | 18.8 | ||
| over 4 times | 73 | 15.7 | ||
| Exercise | Do not participate in LTPA | 129 | 27.8 | |
| Between 0 and 1 h | 86 | 18.5 | ||
| Between 1 and 2 h | 156 | 33.6 | ||
| Between 2 and 3 h | 50 | 10.8 | ||
| More than 3 h | 43 | 9.3 | ||
Validity and reliability analysis.
| Variable | Questionnaire | Factor | Eigen | Cronbach’s α | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | B1, I usually care about my health | 0.847 | 3.977 | 0.864 | 0.943 |
| B2, I am aware of my health condition | 0.812 | ||||
| B4, I feel responsible for my health | 0.765 | ||||
| B3, I strive to maintain and promote my health | 0.737 | ||||
| B5, I am more interested in my health than anyone else | 0.644 | ||||
| B6, I think the most important thing is health | 0.432 | ||||
| Intention to | C4, I will continue to participate in exercise Even if I am financially difficult | 0.875 | 1.817 | 0.912 | 0.970 |
| C3, I will continue to participate in exercise even though I am tired | 0.820 | ||||
| C1, I will continue to participate in exercise even if I am busy | 0.715 | ||||
| C2, I will continue to participate in the exercise | 0.696 |
((1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) usually, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree). The higher the number, the higher the HC. KMO = 0.924; Bartlett test = 6117.178; df = 190; p = 0.000. Matrix of correlation coefficients used in factor analysis. Factor loading: A value indicating the correlation between factors and variables in factor analysis. Eigenvalues: Extracted sum of squares loading. Cronbach’s α: Reliability Index.
Figure 1Confirmatory factor analysis showing the suitability of HC and intention to participate in LTPA. Numbers describe the relationship between factors. The reliability values of HC and intention to participate in LTPA are detailed in Table 3.
Confirmatory factor analysis of HC and intention to participate in LTPA.
| Path | Non-Standard | Standard | S.E. | C.R. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 ← HC | 1.000 | 0.833 | - | - |
| B2 ← HC | 0.894 | 0.794 | 0.046 | 19.249 *** |
| B3 ← HC | 1.048 | 0.811 | 0.053 | 19.815 *** |
| B4 ← HC | 0.865 | 0.760 | 0.048 | 18.151 *** |
| B5 ← HC | 0.967 | 0.681 | 0.061 | 15.744 *** |
| B6 ← HC | 0.499 | 0.439 | 0.053 | 9.104 *** |
| C1 ← Intention to participate in LTPA | 1.000 | 0.863 | - | - |
| C2 ← Intention to participate in LTPA | 0.863 | 0.831 | 0.039 | 22.351 *** |
| C3 ← Intention to participate in LTPA | 1.021 | 0.856 | 0.044 | 23.455 *** |
| C4 ← Intention to participate in LTPA | 1.027 | 0.854 | 0.044 | 23.371 *** |
((1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) usually, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree). The higher the number, the higher the HC, *** p < 0.001. Estimate is a non-standardized value, S.E. (Standard error), and the C.R. (Critical ratio) value must be 1.96 or more.
Chi-square among LTPA according to menstruation.
| Variable | Menstruation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular | Irregular | Total | χ2 ( | |
| LTPA | 288 (62.1) | 176 (37.9) | 464 | 5.828 (0.212) |
| Do not participate in LTPA | 69 (53.5) | 60 (46.5) | 129 | |
| Before menstruation | 63 (63.6) | 36 (36.4) | 99 | |
| After menstruation | 89 (66.4) | 45 (33.6) | 134 | |
| Always | 36 (66.7) | 18 (33.3) | 54 | |
| When not menstruating | 31 (64.6) | 17 (35.4) | 48 | |
((1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) usually, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree). The higher the number, the higher the HC. Menstruation: bleeds regularly on average every 28 days, and irregular means does not. LTPA: Do not participate in LTPA, before menstruation (luteal phase), after menstruation (period excluding menstruation in the follicular phase), when not menstruating (any period without menstruation phase), always. N: Number of LTPA responses by menstruation. %: Ratio to the number. χ2: chi-square. p: significance level.
t-test among HC, amount of LTPA, and intention to participate in LTPA by regular or irregular menstruation.
| Variable | Regular | Irregular | t |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | M | SD | |||
| HC | 3.732 | 0.6478 | 3.416 | 0.000 | 5.122 *** | 0.000 |
| Amount of LTPA | 2.829 | 1.242 | 2.401 | 0.002 | 3.659 *** | 0.002 |
| Intention to participate in LTPA | 3.243 | 0.8639 | 2.992 | 0.002 | 3.092 *** | 0.002 |
((1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) usually, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree), The higher the number, the higher the HC. *** p < 0.001; M: Average of the total score of the questions answered; SD: Standard deviation; t: Value of t-test; p: significance level.
ANOVA among HC, amount of LTPA, and intention to participate in LTPA.
| Variable | LTPA | N | M | (SD) | F |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | Do not participate in LTPA | 129 | 3.338 | 0.6332 | 8.478 | 0.000 *** |
| Before menstruation | 99 | 3.745 | 0.6363 | |||
| After menstruation | 134 | 3.702 | 0.5646 | |||
| Always | 54 | 3.642 | 0.6740 | |||
| When not menstruating | 48 | 3.781 | 0.8158 | |||
| Amount of LTPA | Do not participate in LTPA | 129 | 2.374 | 0.7453 | 14.001 | 0.000 *** |
| Before menstruation | 99 | 2.925 | 0.8060 | |||
| After menstruation | 134 | 3.010 | 0.7957 | |||
| Always | 54 | 2.827 | 0.8824 | |||
| When not menstruating | 48 | 3.104 | 0.7844 | |||
| Intention to participate in LTPA | Do not exercise | 129 | 2.581 | 0.8023 | 23.854 | 0.000 *** |
| Before menstruation | 99 | 3.305 | 0.7656 | |||
| After menstruation | 134 | 3.337 | 0.7178 | |||
| Always | 54 | 3.449 | 0.8261 | |||
| When not menstruating | 48 | 3.474 | 0.8965 |
((1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) usually, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree), The higher the number, the higher the HC. *** p < 0.001; N: Number of LTPA responses according to HC, Amount of LTPA, Intention to LTPA; M: Average of the total score of the questions answered; SD: Standard deviation; F: Value of ANOVA; p: significance level.
Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis among HC, amount of LTPA, and intention to participate in LTPA.
| Variables | HC | Amount of LTPA | Intention to |
|---|---|---|---|
| HC | 1 | - | - |
| Amount of LTPA | 0.274 ** | 1 | - |
| Intention to participate in LTPA | 0.448 ** | 0.468 ** | 1 |
((1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) usually, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree). The higher the number, the higher the HC. ** p < 0.01. The Pearson correlation coefficient showed a positive relationship for HC, amount of LTPA, and intention to participate in LTPA.