Literature DB >> 18359137

How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity.

Ester Cerin1, Eva Leslie.   

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify individual, social, and environmental contributors (mediators) to individual- and area-level differences in leisure-time physical activity across socio-economic groups. A two-stage stratified sampling design was used to recruit 20-65 year old adults (N=2194) living in 154 census collection districts of Adelaide, Australia (overall response rate: 12%). Participants completed two surveys six months apart (response rate on the second survey: 83%). Individual-level socio-economic status (SES) was assessed using self-report measures on educational attainment, household income, and household size. Area-level SES was assessed using census data on median household income and household size for each selected census district. Bootstrap generalized linear models were used to examine associations between SES, potential mediators, and leisure-time physical activity. The product-of-coefficient test was used to estimate mediating effects. All SES measures were independently associated with potential individual and social mediators of the SES-activity relationships. Individual- and area-level income was also associated with perceived neighborhood attributes. Self-efficacy and social support for physical activity explained virtually all of the differences in physical activity across educational attainment groups. Physical barriers to walking and access to public open space contributed in part to the explanation of differences in recreational walking across income groups. Yet, self-efficacy and social support were the key mediators of the observed relationships between individual- and area-level income and physical activity. This study suggests that in order to increase physical activity participation in the more disadvantaged segments of the population, comprehensive, multilevel interventions targeting activity-related attitudes and skills as well as social and physical environments are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18359137     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  58 in total

1.  Prevalence and predictors of physical inactivity in a slum in Brazil.

Authors:  João Guilherme Bezerra Alves; José Natal Figueiroa; Lucas Victor Alves
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Walking for recreation and perceptions of the neighborhood environment in older Chinese urban dwellers.

Authors:  Ester Cerin; Cindy H P Sit; Anthony Barnett; Man-chin Cheung; Wai-man Chan
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 3.  Promoting Physical Activity among Underserved Populations.

Authors:  Andrea S Mendoza-Vasconez; Sarah Linke; Mario Muñoz; Dori Pekmezi; Cole Ainsworth; Mayra Cano; Victoria Williams; Bess H Marcus; Britta A Larsen
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Assessing environmental support for better health: active living opportunity audits in rural communities in the southern United States.

Authors:  Jennifer C Robinson; Tiffany L Carson; Erica R Johnson; Claudia M Hardy; James M Shikany; Eva Green; Lillie M Willis; John V Marron; Yufeng Li; Choo Hyung Lee; Monica L Baskin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Differential accuracy of physical activity self-report by body mass index.

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Kathleen Y Wolin; Dustin T Duncan; Daniel P Heil; Sandy Askew; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2012-03

6.  Mediation analyses: applications in nutrition research and reading the literature.

Authors:  Chondra M Lockwood; Carol A DeFrancesco; Diane L Elliot; Shirley A A Beresford; Deborah J Toobert
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2010-05

7.  Inequitable walking conditions among older people: examining the interrelationship of neighbourhood socio-economic status and urban form using a comparative case study.

Authors:  Theresa L Grant; Nancy Edwards; Heidi Sveistrup; Caroline Andrew; Mary Egan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Nutrition and Health Improvements After Participation in an Urban Home Garden Program.

Authors:  Kartika Palar; Emiliano Lemus Hufstedler; Karen Hernandez; Annie Chang; Laura Ferguson; Raul Lozano; Sheri D Weiser
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.045

9.  Explanation of Two Anomalous Results in Statistical Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew S Fritz; Aaron B Taylor; David P Mackinnon
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  A walk (or cycle) to the park: active transit to neighborhood amenities, the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Janne Boone-Heinonen; David R Jacobs; Stephen Sidney; Barbara Sternfeld; Cora E Lewis; Penny Gordon-Larsen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.