| Literature DB >> 35741989 |
Xia Li1,2, Shuyi Qian1,2, Feng Huang1, Kaimin Li3, Yu Song1, Jiqian Liu1, Yujie Guo1, Chunhui Zhang1, Christophe Blecker2.
Abstract
The influence of freezing on the protein profile and quality traits in bovine Longissimus thoracic (LT) muscle was investigated by the data-independent acquisition (DIA) technique. Compared to fresh meat, a total of 262 proteins were identified as differential abundance proteins (DAPs) in four frozen groups (-12 °C, -18 °C, -38 °C, and -80 °C). According to the bioinformatics analysis, most of the DAPs in the significant Go terms and the KEGG pathway were structure proteins and enzymes. Proteome changes in the frozen bovine muscle at -12 °C and -18 °C were more significant than those at -38 °C and -80 °C. The result was consistent with the deterioration trend of the meat quality. The correlation analysis revealed that 17 proteins were correlated closely with the color, shear force, thawing loss, and cooking loss of the frozen meat, which could be used as putative biomarkers for frozen meat quality. MYO18A and ME3 are newly discovered proteins that are associated with frozen beef quality. In addition, CTTN and SERPINB6 were identified in frozen groups, which exhibited a significant inverse correlation with thawing loss (p < 0.01). These findings reveal the quality changes induced by freezing at the protein molecular level and provide new insights into the control of quality deterioration.Entities:
Keywords: data-independent acquisition (DIA); freezing temperatures; meat quality; protein profile
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741989 PMCID: PMC9222788 DOI: 10.3390/foods11121791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Experimental design and workflow for quantitative proteomic analysis of beef using DIA technology.
Quality characteristics of beef in fresh control (CON) and different frozen treatments (−12 °C, −18 °C, −38 °C, −80 °C).
| Attribute | CON | −12 °C | −18 °C | −38 °C | −80 °C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38.05 ± 0.51 b | 40.06 ± 0.70 a | 39.59 ± 1.81 ab | 39.17 ± 0.90 ab | 39.04 ± 0.79 ab | 0.034 | |
| 15.38 ± 0.71 a | 12.94 ± 0.34 c | 13.40 ± 0.18 c | 14.42 ± 0.28 b | 14.47 ± 0.24 b | <0.001 | |
| 11.66 ± 1.38 c | 13.19 ± 0.23 a | 12.78 ± 0.39 ab | 12.03 ± 0.12 bc | 11.75 ± 0.18 bc | 0.001 | |
| Thawing Loss/% | – | 10.50 ± 0.84 a | 8.83 ± 0.75 b | 7.67 ± 0.52 bc | 7.17 ± 0.7 c | <0.001 |
| Cooking Loss/% | 28.28 ± 2.12 c | 34.0 ± 26 a | 32.33 ± 2.34 ab | 30.33 ± 3.14 abc | 29.83 ± 172 bc | 0.001 |
| Shear Force/kg | 7.81 ± 0.69 b | 10.72 ± 0.52 a | 9.94 ± 0.64 a | 8.36 ± 0.57 b | 8.22 ± 0.58 b | <0.001 |
All the values are presented as means ± SD, n = 6. Different letters, a–c, represent the significance between the different treatments. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 2(A) PCA score plots and PLS-DA score plots between frozen treatments and CON. (B) Volcano plots showing differential abundance proteins (DAPs) in the beef muscle of −12 °C/CON, −18 °C/CON, −38 °C/CON, and −80 °C/CON comparisons. (C) Venn diagrams representing the overlap of DAPs from the −12 °C/CON, −18 °C/CON, −38 °C/CON, and −80 °C/CON comparisons. (D) Hierarchical cluster analysis of differential abundance proteins (DAPs) in the beef muscle of different treatments compared with CON. (In PCA score plots, PLS-DA score plots, and Venn diagrams, A represents CON; B represents −12 °C; C represents −18 °C; D represents −38 °C; and E represents −80 °C.)
Figure 3(A) Gene ontology (GO) classification of differentially expressed proteins in frozen beef vs. CON group. (B) KOG analysis of DAPs (x-axis displays DAPs count, y-axis displays KOG terms) in frozen beef vs. CON group. (C) KEGG pathway of DAPs in frozen beef vs. CON group.
Figure 4(A) Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the total DAPs. (B) A diagram of proteins correlated with at least one quality indicator (r > 0.60; p < 0.05).
Figure 5Expression profiles of the proteins in different freezing temperatures were validated by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). The results were represented as mean ± SD from three experiments. Asterisks represent levels of significance (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).