| Literature DB >> 35741419 |
Md Mizanur Rahman1, Yu-Young Lee2, Seung-Min Park2, Choong-Ho Ham2, Ha-Cheol Sung1.
Abstract
Despite having some limitations, the use of skeletochronology-age determination by counting lines of arrested growth (LAGs)-in amphibians is increasing. The main limitation of using skeletochronology is identifying the innermost visible line (IVL) and counting the exact number of LAGs. Thus, we tested its applicability to Kaloula borealis, a class II endangered amphibian in South Korea. We reared juveniles in the lab to investigate the process of bone formation. This confirmed the development of one LAG each year. Hence, our study validates skeletochronology for the age determination of this species and recommends it for others that show similar growth patterns. Furthermore, the comparison of threshold diameters with the IVL of wild individuals confirmed no LAG1 resorption. The average age of males and females in this population was 2.75 ± 1.05 and 3.64 ± 3 years, respectively. We estimated sexual maturity at 2 years with rapid growth up to that stage in both sexes. We found a female-dominated sexual size dimorphism. This study offers accurate information on the life history traits and age structure of K. borealis that may help to evaluate population dynamics in other areas, identify vulnerable life stages and sites, assess the causes of population decline, and set conservation priorities.Entities:
Keywords: growth curve; innermost visible line; life history trait; lines of arrested growth; sexual size dimorphism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741419 PMCID: PMC9220234 DOI: 10.3390/biology11060898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Map of study site in South Korea.
Figure 2The phalangeal cross-section of laboratory-reared juvenile K. borealis by growth stage; (A) immediately after the metamorphosis; (B) before the first hibernation; (C) immediately after the first hibernation; (D) before the next hibernation. ML = metamorphosis line; MC = marrow cavity; PB = periosteal bone; EB = endosteal bone; LAG = line of arrested growth.
The diameter values of ML and LAG1 in laboratory-reared juvenile K. borealis.
| Life Stage | Number of Individuals | Lines | Diameter (μm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Threshold * | Min | Max | |||
| Juvenile | 10 | ML | 109.75 ± 8.64 | 127 | 96.80 | 123.38 |
| LAG1 | 162.90 ± 8.63 | 180 | 146.35 | 174.69 | ||
ML = metamorphosis line; LAG1 = first line of arrested growth. * = Mean + (2 × SD).
Figure 3(A) Phalangeal cross-section of a two-year-old individual; (B) phalangeal cross-section of a seven-year-old individual; (C) percentage of age groups of the male community of adult K. borealis population at Lake Sihwa; (D) percentage of age groups of the female community of adult K. borealis population at Lake Sihwa; (E) age structure in the adult K. borealis population at Lake Sihwa; (F) IVL diameter distribution in the adult K. borealis population at Lake Sihwa. ML = metamorphosis line; MC = marrow cavity; PB = periosteal bone; LAG = line of arrested growth; KL = Kastschenco’s line; IVL = innermost visible line.
Summary of age (mean ± SD) in the adult population of boreal digging frogs (K. borealis) in Lake Sihwa.
| Life Stage | Sex | Number of | Age (Years) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | Z | |||
| Adult | Male | 122 | 2.75 ± 1.05 | 2–8 | −2.845 |
| Female | 14 | 3.64 ± 1.28 | 2–6 | ||
Z < 0.05.
Maximum growth size and growth coefficient in the adult population of boreal digging frogs (K. borealis) in Lake Sihwa.
| Sex | Number of Individuals | Maximum Growth Size (mm; Mean ± SD) | Growth Coefficient (K; Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 122 | 43.08 ± 0.63 | 1.05 ± 0.10 |
| Female | 14 | 45.90 ± 1.06 | 1.16 ± 0.15 |
Figure 4The growth curve for the adult K. borealis population at Lake Sihwa.
Figure 5Relationship of age with body size and weight of adult K. borealis population at Lake Sihwa: (A) relationship between age and body size in the first year; (B) relationship between age and body size in the first year; (C) relationship between age and body size in the whole study period; (D) relationship between age and body weight in the first year; (E) relationship between age and body weight in the first year; (F) relationship between age and body weight in the whole study period.