Nadya Guellil1, Neha Argawal2, Magnus Krieghoff3, Ingmar Kaden3, Christian Hohaus4, Hans-Joerg Meisel2, Philipp Schenk5. 1. Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Burn Unit, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany. 3. Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Dessau, 06847 Dessau, Germany. 5. Department of Science and Research, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the regeneration and therapy of degenerated intervertebral discs, the height, volume or categorizing assessments, such as Pfirrmann classification, are used to quantify the discs themselves and the effects of therapy. Here, the question of transferability, in the sense of reliability, of the results arises in the common exchange. METHODS: We have investigated two established and a newly developed (9-point measurement), easy to use methods for height measurement and volume measurement on degenerated and healthy lumbar intervertebral discs of 66 patients regarding inter- and intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: In overview, we found very different reliabilities. While the intra-observer reliability showed good to excellent agreement for both healthy and degenerated lumbar discs for the height and volume measurements, the inter-observer reliability was low or moderate in some cases. The 9-point method for height determination consistently showed better reliability for both healthy and degenerated discs, for both intra- and inter-observer reliability, compared to the two established methods. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using the 9-point measurement as the method to communicate lumbar disc height, both for healthy and degenerated discs. Due to the partly low or moderate reliability, significant differences in the measured heights can already occur, which can lead to a worsened comparability.
BACKGROUND: In the regeneration and therapy of degenerated intervertebral discs, the height, volume or categorizing assessments, such as Pfirrmann classification, are used to quantify the discs themselves and the effects of therapy. Here, the question of transferability, in the sense of reliability, of the results arises in the common exchange. METHODS: We have investigated two established and a newly developed (9-point measurement), easy to use methods for height measurement and volume measurement on degenerated and healthy lumbar intervertebral discs of 66 patients regarding inter- and intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: In overview, we found very different reliabilities. While the intra-observer reliability showed good to excellent agreement for both healthy and degenerated lumbar discs for the height and volume measurements, the inter-observer reliability was low or moderate in some cases. The 9-point method for height determination consistently showed better reliability for both healthy and degenerated discs, for both intra- and inter-observer reliability, compared to the two established methods. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using the 9-point measurement as the method to communicate lumbar disc height, both for healthy and degenerated discs. Due to the partly low or moderate reliability, significant differences in the measured heights can already occur, which can lead to a worsened comparability.
Authors: Christian W A Pfirrmann; Alexander Metzdorf; Achim Elfering; Juerg Hodler; Norbert Boos Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Ron I Riesenburger; Mina G Safain; Richard Ogbuji; Jackson Hayes; Steven W Hwang Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Derick C En'Wezoh; Dana A Leonard; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Mitchel B Harris; Jay M Zampini; Christopher M Bono Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Tapio Videman; Michele C Battié; Laura E Gibbons; Kenneth Maravilla; Hannu Manninen; Jaakko Kaprio Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Tapio Videman; Michele C Battié; Eric Parent; Laura E Gibbons; Pauli Vainio; Jaakko Kaprio Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 3.468