| Literature DB >> 35741167 |
Simone Agnes Schenke1,2, Alfredo Campennì3, Murat Tuncel4, Gianluca Bottoni5, Sait Sager6, Tatjana Bogovic Crncic7, Damir Rozic8, Rainer Görges9, Pinar Pelin Özcan10, Daniel Groener11, Hubertus Hautzel12, Rigobert Klett13, Michael Christoph Kreissl2, Luca Giovanella14.
Abstract
99mTc-MIBI (MIBI) imaging is able to exclude malignancy of hypofunctioning thyroid nodules (TNs) with high probability but false positive results are frequent due to low specificity. Therefore, pre-test selection of appropriate TNs is crucial. For image evaluation visual and semiquantitative methods (Washout index, WOInd) are used. Aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MIBI imaging in hypofunctioning TNs with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytology results in a multicentric European setting. Patients with hypofunctioning TNs, EU-TIRADS 4 or 5, Bethesda III/IV and MIBI imaging were included. For visual evaluation the intensity of MIBI uptake in the TN was compared to normal thyroid tissue. 358 patients with 365 TNs (n = 68 malignant) were included. Planar imaging (SPECT) showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 96% (94%), 21% (22%), 22% (15%), 96% (96%), and 35% (32%). The WOInd (38.9% of all cases, optimal cutoff: -19%) showed a sens 100% (spec 89%, PPV 82%, NPV 100%, ACC 93%). For hypofunctioning TNs at intermediate or high risk with indeterminate cytology, a MIBI negative result on visual evaluation is an effective tool to rule-out thyroid malignancy. The semi-quantitative method could considerably improve overall diagnostic performance of MIBI imaging.Entities:
Keywords: 99mTc-MIBI imaging; hypofunctioning thyroid nodules; molecular imaging; risk stratification; thyroid nodules’ assessment; thyroid scintigraphy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741167 PMCID: PMC9221758 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Patients’ characteristics and acquisition parameters.
| All | Benign TNs | Malignant TNs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Female | 284 | 235 | 49 | |
| Male | 74 | 55 | 19 | |
| Age (years ± SD) | 53.4 (13.1) | 53.7 (12.8) | 52.2 (14.9) | 0.81 |
| Maximum size (mm) | 25 | 25 | 28 | 0.32 |
| Median (25th/75th-p) | (19/33) | (19/32) | (19/34) | |
| Activity (MBq) | 370 | 370 | 370 | 0.13 |
| Median (25th/75th-p) | (323/384) | (314/399) | (370/370) | |
| Early images (min after injection) | 271 | 211 | 60 | 0.001 |
| Median (25th/75th-p) | 10 (10/20) | 10 (10/20) | 10 (10/10) | |
| Late images (min after injection) | 365 | 297 | 68 | 0.12 |
| Median (25th/75th-p) | 60 (60/60) | 60 (60/60) | 60 (60/60) | |
TNs—thyroid nodules, n—number, SD—standard deviation, mm—millimeter, p—percentile, min—minutes.
Subgroup of thyroid nodules with available histological results compared to the MIBI imaging methods.
| FA ( | FTC ( | MNG ( | MTC ( | OA ( | PDTC ( | PTC ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIBI planar late | |||||||
| Hypointense (%) | 9.9 | 16.7 | 23.3 | 100 | 7.7 | 0 | 1.7 |
| Isointense (%) | 8.5 | 0 | 19.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.3 |
| Hyperintense (%) | 81.7 | 83.3 | 57 | 0 | 92.3 | 100 | 85 |
| Visual pattern | |||||||
| A (%) | 3.5 | 0 | 17.1 | 100 | 5.3 | n.a. | 1.8 |
| B (%) | 3.5 | 0 | 4.3 | 0 | 0 | n.a. | 0 |
| C (%) | 93 | 100 | 78.6 | 0 | 94.7 | n.a. | 98.2 |
| WOInd | |||||||
| Low washout, ≥−19 (%) | 2.4 | n.a. | 0 | n.a. | 81.8 | n.a. | 100 |
| High washout, <−19 (%) | 97.6 | n.a. | 100 | n.a. | 18.2 | n.a. | 0 |
FA—follicular adenoma, FTC—follicular thyroid cancer, MNG—multinodular goiter, MTC–medullary thyroid cancer, OA—oncocytic adenoma, PDTC—poorly differentiated thyroid cancer, PTC—papillary thyroid cancer, WOInd—washout index, n.a.—not applicable.
Figure 1Early planar MIBI imaging results (% of thyroid nodules, MIBI uptake in the thyroid nodule compared to the MIBI uptake in the paranodular tissue).
Figure 2Late planar MIBI imaging results (% of thyroid nodules, MIBI uptake in the thyroid nodule compared to the MIBI uptake in the paranodular tissue).
Figure 3Visual pattern of early and late MIBI uptake (% of thyroid nodules): A: no uptake in the nodule early and late, B: uptake in the nodule that had decreased from early to late image, C: uptake in the nodule that remained unchanged or had further increased on the delayed image.
Figure 4MIBI SPECT results (% of thyroid nodules, MIBI uptake in the thyroid nodule compared to the MIBI uptake in the paranodular tissue).
Figure 5Receiver operating curve analysis of washout index (WOInd); optimal cutoff = −19%; area under curve (AUC) = 0.980.
Figure 6Semiquantitative results (cutoff WOInd −19%).
Diagnostic performance of visual MIBI imaging evaluation and MIBI washout index.
| Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV(%) | NPV (%) | ACC (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIBI early | 96.7 | 10.4 | 23.5 | 91.7 | 29.5 |
| MIBI late | 95.6 | 21.2 | 21.7 | 95.5 | 35.1 |
| MIBI-SPECT | 93.8 | 22.2 | 15.2 | 96 | 31.5 |
| Visual pattern | 96.7 | 16.6 | 24.8 | 94.6 | 34.3 |
| Washout index cutoff | 100 | 89.4 | 82.1 | 100 | 92.9 |
SPECT—single photon emission computed tomography, PPV—positive predictive value, NPV—negative predictive value, ACC—accuracy.
Figure 7Diagnostic algorithm for the assessment of thyroid nodules. Legend: TIRADS–Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; FU–Follow up; AFTN–Autonomously functioning thyroid nodule; RIT–Radioiodine therapy; FNB -fine-needle biopsy; FNAC–fine-needle aspiration cytology.
Figure 8Flowchart for the MIBI image interpretation.