| Literature DB >> 35740809 |
Eduardo Melguizo-Ibáñez1, Gabriel González-Valero2, Georgian Badicu3, Ana Filipa-Silva4,5,6, Filipe Manuel Clemente4,5,7, Hugo Sarmento8, Félix Zurita-Ortega1, José Luis Ubago-Jiménez1.
Abstract
Adolescence is a key developmental period from a health, physical and psychological perspective. In view of this, the present research aimed to establish the relationship between emotional intelligence, Mediterranean diet adherence, BMI and age. In order to address this aim, (a) an explanatory model is developed of emotional intelligence and its relationship with Mediterranean diet adherence, BMI and age, and (b) the proposed structural model is examined via multi-group analysis as a function of whether students engage in more than three hours of physical activity a week. To this end, a quantitative, non-experimental (ex post facto), comparative and cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 567 students (11.10 ± 1.24). The instruments used were an ad hoc questionnaire, the KIDMED questionnaire and the TMMS-24. Outcomes reveal that participants who engage in more than three hours of physical activity a week score more highly for emotional intelligence than those who do not meet this criterion. Furthermore, it was also observed that, whilst the majority of the sample was physically active, improvement was required with regards to Mediterranean diet adherence.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; body mass index; emotional intelligence; physical activity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35740809 PMCID: PMC9221708 DOI: 10.3390/children9060872
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Figure 1Structural equation model. Note: Emotional attention (EA); emotional clarity (EC); emotional repair (ER); body mass index (BMI); Mediterranean diet adherence (MDA); age (AGE).
Comparative analysis between physical activity (Yes/No) and emotional intelligence.
| Levene Test | ES (d) | 95% CI | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | M | SD | F | Sig | T | df | P | ||||
|
|
| 69 | 3.423 | 0.825 | 0.352 | 0.553 | −0.684 | 86.915 | >0.05 | 0.525 | [0.161; 0.342] |
|
| 498 | 3.496 | 0.805 | ||||||||
|
|
| 69 | 3.429 | 0.877 | 0.009 | 0.926 | −1.628 | 0.107 | >0.05 | 0.214 | [0.038; 0.466] |
|
| 498 | 3.612 | 0.851 | ||||||||
|
|
| 69 | 3.423 | 0.815 | 0.763 | 0.383 | −3.520 | 87.380 | ≤0.05 | 0.458 | [0.205; 0.711] |
|
| 498 | 3.792 | 0.805 | ||||||||
Note: 1 Emotional attention (EA); emotional clarity (EC); emotional repair (ER). Note 2: Sample (N); Average (M); Standard Deviation (SD); F-Snedecor for equality of variances (F); Significance Level (Sig); T-value (T); Degrees of Freedom (df); Bilateral Significance (P); Cohen’s standardized d-index (ES (d)); 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference (95% CI).
BMI descriptive analysis.
| Frequency | Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 168 | 29.6% |
|
| 392 | 69.1% | |
|
| 7 | 1.3% | |
|
| 567 | 100% | |
Comparative analysis of body mass index and physical activity engagement.
| ES | Phi = 0.119 | Body Mass Index | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cramer’s V = 0.119 | Underweight | Normal Weight | Overweight | |||
|
|
| Count | 12 | 57 | 0 | 69 |
| % PA | 17.4% | 82.6% | 0.0% | 100% | ||
|
| Count | 156 | 330 | 12 | 498 | |
| % PA | 31.3% | 66.3% | 2.4% | 100% | ||
Note 1: Physical Activity (PA).
Comparative analysis of Mediterranean diet adherence and physical activity engagement.
| ES | Phi = 0.083 | PA | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cramer’s V = 0.083 | No | Yes | |||
|
|
| Count | 3 | 18 | 21 |
| % MDA | 14.3% | 85.7% | 100% | ||
|
| Count | 48 | 321 | 369 | |
| % MDA | 13.0% | 87.0% | 100% | ||
|
| Count | 18 | 159 | 177 | |
| % MDA | 10.2% | 89.8% | 100% | ||
Note 1: Physical Activity (PA); Mediterranean Diet Adherence (MDA).
Figure 2SEM pertaining to the entire sample. Note: Emotional attention (EA); emotional clarity (EC); emotional repair (ER); body mass index (BMI); Mediterranean diet adherence (MDA); age (AGE).
SEM belonging to the entire sample.
| Association between | RW | SRW | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimation | SE | CR |
| Estimation | |
| AGE ← EA | 0.075 | 0.097 | 0.771 | 0.441 | 0.037 |
| AGE ← EC | −0.115 | 0.094 | −1.218 | 0.223 | −0.059 |
| AGE ← ER | −0.008 | 0.094 | −0.087 | 0.931 | −0.004 |
| MDA ← EA | 0.059 | 0.042 | 1.406 | 0.160 | 0.066 |
| MDA ← EC | 0.038 | 0.041 | 0.947 | 0.343 | 0.046 |
| BMI ← EC | 0.109 | 0.037 | 2.954 | ** | 0.143 |
| BMI ← ER | −0.110 | 0.037 | −2.975 | ** | −0.140 |
| MDA ← ER | 0.096 | 0.041 | 2.366 | ** | 0.111 |
| BMI ← EA | 0.003 | 0.038 | 0.084 | 0.933 | 0.004 |
| EC ← → EA | 0.169 | 0.018 | 9.332 | *** | 0.426 |
| EC ← → ER | 0.170 | 0.019 | 9.198 | *** | 0.419 |
| EA ← → ER | 0.143 | 0.017 | 8.296 | *** | 0.372 |
Note 1: Regression weights (RW); standardized regression weights (SRW); standard error (SE); critical ratio (CR). Note 2: Emotional attention (EA); emotional clarity (EC); emotional Repair (ER); body mass index (BMI); Mediterranean diet adherence (MDA); age (AGE). Note 3: ** p ≤ 0.05; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3SEM pertaining to participants who engage in more than 3 h of PA a week. Note: Emotional attention (EA); emotional clarity (EC); emotional repair (ER); body mass index (BMI); Mediterranean diet adherence (MDA); age (AGE).
SEM pertaining to participants who engage in more than 3 h of PA per week.
| Association between | RW | SRW | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimation | SE | CR |
| Estimation | |
| MDA ← EA | 0.032 | 0.009 | 3.666 | *** | 0.186 |
| AGE ← EA | 0.106 | 0.082 | 1.293 | 0.196 | 0.067 |
| BMI ← EA | −0.042 | 0.032 | −1.307 | 0.191 | −0.067 |
| MDA ← EC | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.808 | 0.419 | 0.045 |
| AGE ← EC | −0.166 | 0.086 | −1.937 | 0.053 | −0.112 |
| BMI ← EC | 0.097 | 0.034 | 2.891 | ** | 0.165 |
| MDA ← ER | 0.012 | 0.010 | 1.297 | 0.195 | 0.071 |
| AGE ← ER | 0.033 | 0.088 | 0.380 | 0.704 | 0.021 |
| BMI ← ER | −0.131 | 0.035 | −3.775 | *** | −0.209 |
| EC ← → EA | 0.330 | 0.034 | 9.680 | *** | 0.482 |
| EC ← → ER | 0.398 | 0.036 | 11.199 | *** | 0.581 |
| EA ← → ER | 0.282 | 0.032 | 8.888 | *** | 0.435 |
Note 1: Regression weights (RW); standardized regression weights (SRW); standard error (SE); critical ratio (CR). Note 2: Emotional attention (EA); emotional clarity (EC); emotional Repair (ER); body mass index (BMI); Mediterranean diet adherence (MDA); age (AGE). Note 3: ** p ≤ 0.05; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4SEM pertaining to participants who do not engage in more than 3 h of PA a week. Note: Emotional attention (EA); emotional clarity (EC); emotional repair (ER); body mass index (BMI); Mediterranean diet adherence (MDA); age (AGE).
SEM pertaining to participants who do not engage in more than 3 h of PA a week.
| Association between | RW | SRW | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimation | SE | CR |
| Estimation | |
| MDA ← EA | 0.027 | 0.030 | 0.906 | 0.365 | 0.130 |
| AGE ← EA | −0.403 | 0.194 | −2.077 | ** | −0.289 |
| BMI ← EA | 0.177 | 0.062 | 2.853 | ** | 0.383 |
| MDA ← EC | −0.009 | 0.028 | −0.312 | 0.755 | −0.045 |
| AGE ← EC | 0.396 | 0.184 | 2.156 | ** | 0.302 |
| BMI ← EC | −0.024 | 0.059 | −0.413 | 0.680 | −0.056 |
| MDA ← ER | 0.027 | 0.031 | 0.866 | 0.386 | 0.129 |
| AGE ← ER | 0.058 | 0.204 | 0.285 | 0.776 | 0.041 |
| BMI ← ER | 0.035 | 0.065 | 0.531 | 0.595 | 0.074 |
| EC ← → EA | 0.332 | 0.095 | 3.473 | *** | 0.464 |
| EC ← → ER | 0.366 | 0.096 | 3.800 | *** | 0.519 |
| EA ← → ER | 0.339 | 0.090 | 3.748 | *** | 0.510 |
Note 1: Regression weights (RW); standardized regression weights (SRW); standard error (SE); critical ratio (CR). Note 2: Emotional attention (EA); emotional clarity (EC); emotional Repair (ER); body mass index (BMI); Mediterranean diet adherence (MDA); age (AGE). Note 3: ** p ≤ 0.05; *** p < 0.001.