| Literature DB >> 35739890 |
Ahmed F A Ghareeb1, Gustavo H Schneiders1,2, James C Foutz1,3, Marie C Milfort1, Alberta L Fuller1, Jianmin Yuan4, Romdhane Rekaya5, Samuel E Aggrey1.
Abstract
Eimeria (E.) maxima invades the midgut of chickens and destroys the intestinal mucosa, impacting nutrient digestibility and absorption. Heat stress (HS) commonly affects the broiler chicken and contributes to inflammation and oxidative stress. We examined the independent and combined effects of HS and E. maxima infection on apparent amino acid ileal digestibility (AID) and mRNA expression of amino acid transporters in broiler chickens (Ross 708). There were four treatment groups: thermoneutral-control (TNc) and infected (TNi), heat-stress control (HSc) and infected (HSi), six replicates of 10 birds/treatment. Ileal content and tissue were sampled at 6 d post infection to determine AID and transporters expression. Surprisingly, the HSi chickens exposed to two critical stressors exhibited normal AID. Only the TNi group displayed reduction in AID. Using TNc as control, the HSc group showed upregulated CAT1, LAT4, TAT1, SNAT1, and SNAT7. The HSi group showed upregulated CAT1 and LAT1, and downregulated b0,+AT, rBAT, SNAT1, and SNAT2. The TNi group showed upregulated CAT1, LAT1, and SNAT1 and downregulated B0AT1, b0,+AT, rBAT, LAT4, and TAT1. The expression of all enterocytic-apical and about half of the basolateral transporters was higher in the HSi group than in the TNi group, indicating that HS can putatively alleviate the E. maxima adverse effect on ileal digestion and absorption.Entities:
Keywords: E. maxima; amino acids’ transporters; apparent ileal digestibility; broilers; mRNA expression
Year: 2022 PMID: 35739890 PMCID: PMC9219439 DOI: 10.3390/ani12121554
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Primer used to detect the expression levels of the amino acids’ transporters using RT-qPCR.
| Nutrient Transporter | Transporter Gene | Gene Bank Accession Number | Size | Align. | Primers Sequences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apical amino acids | B0AT1 |
| 117 | Forward | 5′CTGCCTGGGTTTGTCATCTAT3′ |
| Reverse | 5′GCGCAGACGATACCTGTAAT3′ | ||||
| b0,+AT |
| 113 | Forward | 5′GATCCCTGGAGCCTGAATTAC3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′CTCCTTTCTGTTGTCCTGTTCT3′ | ||||
| rBAT |
| 119 | Forward | 5′CTGAGAGCATCACAGCCTATTC3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′GCCAGGTTCACTGCTGTATT3′ | ||||
| Basolateral amino acids | TAT1 |
| 119 | Forward | 5′GCACCATCGAACCTCTGTATT3′ |
| Reverse | 5′CACTAGACCAAGGCGTTTCTT3′ | ||||
| LAT4 |
| 113 | Forward | 5′GACTCGCAGCATCCCTAAAT3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′GTGTCAGAGAAGTGGACGATATG3′ | ||||
| CAT1 |
| 111 | Forward | 5′CGAACAACAGAGGAGACAGATAA3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′GGGACACAGTATGGCTTTGA3′ | ||||
| LAT1 |
| 98 | Forward | 5′GCCTTCTCCAATGACATCTTCT3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′TAACGCAGCCACATCATACC3′ | ||||
| SNAT1 |
| 108 | Forward | 5′CGCTAAATGCAACATCACCTATC3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′TGGTGGGCAAAGCATACA3′ | ||||
| SNAT2 |
| 127 | Forward | 5′GAACAAGTAGGGCCCTGTAATC3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′GGGCAGAGCTTGATGTTATCT3′ | ||||
| SNAT7 |
| 93 | Forward | 5′CAAGTTCACCATCAGCATCAC3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′CTCAGAGAGCTGGCGTATTT3′ | ||||
| B-actin |
| 125 | Forward | 5′AGACATCAGGGTGTGATGGTTGGT3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′TCCCAGTTGGTGACAATACCGTGT3′ |
Figure 1The apparent ileal digestibility of the neutral (A), basic (B), acidic (C), and hydrophobic (D) amino acids at 6 dpi of E. maxima infected chickens raised under thermoneutral (TNi) and heat-stress (HSi) conditions, as compared to uninfected control chickens raised under thermoneutral (TNc) or heat-stress (HSc) conditions (N = 6). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Figure 2The apparent ileal digestibility of the non-proteinogenic amino acids (A) and sulphonic acids (B) at 6 dpi of E. maxima-infected chickens raised under thermoneutral (TNi) and heat-stress (HSi) conditions, as compared to uninfected control chickens raised under thermoneutral (TNc) or heat-stress (HSc) conditions (N = 6). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Figure 3The mRNA fold expression of the ileal apical amino acid transporters at 6 dpi of E. maxima infected chickens raised under thermoneutral (TNi) and heat-stress (HSi) conditions, as compared to uninfected control chickens raised under thermoneutral (TNc) or heat-stress (HSc) conditions (N = 5). Assays were run in triplicate. RT-qPCR expression results were depicted as 2−ΔΔCt. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Figure 4The mRNA fold expression of the ileal basolateral amino acid transporters at 6 dpi of E. maxima infected chickens raised under thermoneutral (TNi) and heat-stress (HSi) conditions, as compared to uninfected control chickens raised under thermoneutral (TNc) or heat-stress (HSc) conditions (N = 5). Assays were run in triplicate. RT-qPCR expression results were depicted as 2−ΔΔCt. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.