| Literature DB >> 35736925 |
Doris Chirinos-Peinado1, Jorge Castro-Bedriñana1, Elva Ríos-Ríos2, Gloria Mamani-Gamarra3, Elías Quijada-Caro4, Analí Huacho-Jurado4, Wilfredo Nuñez-Rojas5.
Abstract
The dairy basin of the Mantaro River located in the centre of Peru faces serious anthropogenic disturbances as it receives emissions and discharges from the metallurgical mining activity located in the headwaters of the basin and milk contaminated with lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) endangers the environmental and human health, especially children. To measure the concentrations of Pb and Cd in milk and the dangers of their consumption in the Peruvian population, 40 milk samples were collected and quantified by atomic absorption spectrometry. The mean concentration of Pb in milk was 15 ± 2.6 µg/kg, which represented 75% of the Maximum Limit (ML), and that of Cd was 505 ± 123 µg/kg, which exceeded the ML by more than 194 times. The estimated weekly intake of Pb for people aged 2-85 years was below the Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intake (PTWI) references, determining risk coefficients (CRD) < 1. Weekly Cd intake was much higher than the PTWIs and CRDs were between 14 and 34, indicating that consumers would experience carcinogenic health effects, with children being at higher risk than adults, therefore, milk from the area is not safe for consumption. Cd would be transferred mainly through the soil (water)-grass-milk pathway, due to its presence in irrigation water and in fertilizers that contain Cd. The main pathway for Pb entry would be air-soil (water)-milk grass, from the fine particles emitted into the air by the mining-metallurgical activity, developed approximately 90 km from the study area.Entities:
Keywords: cadmium; contaminated milk; dietary exposure; dietary risk; hazard index; lead; target hazard quotient
Year: 2022 PMID: 35736925 PMCID: PMC9227626 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10060317
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxics ISSN: 2305-6304
Pb content in whole milk samples from various countries (2016–2022).
| Year | Country | Samples (n) | Rank (ug/kg) | Means (ug/kg) | Method | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Bangladeshi | 64 | 0.005–0.02 | 0.013 ± 0.004 | AAS | [ |
| 2021 | Ecuador | 58 | 1.6–719 | 208 | AAS | [ |
| 2020 | Kazajstan | 120 | 1–8 | 4.5 | AAS | [ |
| 2020 | Peru | 20 | 540–600 | 580 ± 18 | AAS | [ |
| 2020 | Russia | 1500 | 75–110 | 88 | AAS | [ |
| 2019 | Turkey | 20 | 25–124 | - | ICP-MS | [ |
| 2019 | Poland | 12–13 | - | ICP-MS | [ | |
| 2018 | Iran | 72 | - | 32.83 ± 20.8 | ICP-OES | [ |
| 2018 | Iran | 118 | 0–250 | 47 ± 3.9 | GFAAS | [ |
| 2018 | Indonesia | 30 | - | 558 ± 43 | AAS | [ |
| 2016 | Iran | 50 | - | 14 | Voltametry | [ |
| 2016 | Iran | 85 | 0.7–23.7 | 3.24 ± 1.32 | AAS | [ |
Cd content in whole milk samples from various countries (2016–2022).
| Year | Country | Samples (n) | Rank (ug/kg) | Means (ug/kg) | Method | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Bangladeshi | 64 | 0.021–0.045 | 0.032 ± 0.005 | AAS | [ |
| 2020 | Kazajstan | 120 | 2.5–2.9 | 2.7 | AAS | [ |
| 2020 | Peru | 20 | 11–32 | 19.7 ± 7.3 | AAS | [ |
| 2020 | Russia | 1500 | 4–11 | 7.7 | AAS | [ |
| 2019 | Turkey | 20 | 0.1–4.0 | - | ICP-MS | [ |
| 2019 | Poland | 0–6.7 | - | ICP-MS | [ | |
| 2018 | Iran | 118 | 0–100 | 4.7 ± 1 | GFAAS | [ |
| 2018 | Indonesia | 30 | - | 110 | AAS | [ |
| 2016 | Iran | 50 | - | 1 | Voltametric | [ |
| 2016 | Bangladeshi | 90 | <1–75 | 53 | FASS | [ |
Figure 1Map of the Mataro Valley—Study Area, Mantaro River left bank.
The concentration of Pb and Cd in milk and comparison with MPLs for whole milk (n = 40).
| Variable | Mean | SD | VC, % | Minimum | Maximum | MPL, µg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb, µg/kg | 15b | 2.6 | 17.90 | 10 | 20 | 20 a |
| Cd, µg/kg | 505 a | 123.2 | 24.41 | 280 | 690 | 2.6 b |
a,b, Average values for each metal with different letters vary statistically with its corresponding MPL (p < 0.01). MPL: Maximum permissible limit, SD: Standard deviation, CV: coefficient of variation.
Daily Pb and Cd exposure from milk consumption in populations aged 2–85 years—Perú.
| Age (Year) | Body Weight/sex (kg) | DMI | EDI Pb | EDI Cd | EDI Pb/d | EDI Cd/d | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | ||
| 2 | 12.40 | 11.80 | 0.500 | 0.605 | 0.636 | 20.36 | 21.40 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 252 | 252 |
| 5 | 17.90 | 17.40 | 0.500 | 0.419 | 0.431 | 14.11 | 14.51 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 252 | 252 |
| 10 | 29.60 | 29.80 | 0.600 | 0.304 | 0.302 | 10.24 | 10.17 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 310 | 310 |
| 15 | 51.70 | 49.30 | 0.600 | 0.174 | 0.183 | 5.86 | 6.15 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 310 | 310 |
| 20 | 60.30 | 53.50 | 0.157 | 0.038 | 0.046 | 1.27 | 1.54 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 76 | 82 |
| 30 | 66.30 | 59.60 | 0.157 | 0.034 | 0.041 | 1.15 | 1.38 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 76 | 82 |
| 40 | 69.30 | 61.60 | 0.154 | 0.032 | 0.039 | 1.06 | 1.32 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 74 | 81 |
| 50 | 67.60 | 60.70 | 0.154 | 0.032 | 0.040 | 1.09 | 1.34 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 74 | 81 |
| 60 | 64.80 | 59.20 | 0.195 | 0.043 | 0.052 | 1.44 | 1.74 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 93 | 103 |
| 70 | 59.30 | 54.50 | 0.195 | 0.047 | 0.056 | 1.58 | 1.89 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 93 | 103 |
| 80 | 56.30 | 52.90 | 0.195 | 0.049 | 0.058 | 1.66 | 1.95 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 93 | 103 |
| 85 | 55.60 | 49.50 | 0.195 | 0.050 | 0.062 | 1.68 | 2.08 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 93 | 103 |
DMI: Daily Milk Intake, Kg. EDI: Estimated daily intake.
Weekly intake and dietary risk to Pb and Cd from milk consumption in populations aged 2–85 years in Peru.
| Age (Year) | WI Pb | WI Cd | TWI | DRC Pb | DRC Cd | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Pb | Cd | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 2 | 52.50 | 52.50 | 1767 | 1767 | 310 | 72 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 24.6 | 24.6 |
| 5 | 52.50 | 52.50 | 1767 | 1767 | 448 | 104 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 17.0 | 17.0 |
| 10 | 63.00 | 63.00 | 2121 | 2121 | 740 | 172 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 12.4 | 12.4 |
| 15 | 63.00 | 63.00 | 2121 | 2121 | 1293 | 300 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 20 | 15.86 | 17.12 | 534 | 576 | 1508 | 350 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| 30 | 15.86 | 17.12 | 534 | 576 | 1658 | 385 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| 40 | 15.86 | 17.12 | 534 | 576 | 1663 | 386 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| 50 | 15.33 | 16.90 | 516 | 569 | 1665 | 386 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| 60 | 15.83 | 16.90 | 516 | 569 | 1695 | 393 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| 70 | 19.43 | 21.42 | 654 | 721 | 1483 | 354 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| 80 | 19.43 | 21.42 | 654 | 721 | 1408 | 327 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 85 | 19.43 | 21.42 | 654 | 721 | 1390 | 322 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
WI: Weekly intake. TWI: Weekly reference intake. DRC: Dietary Risk Coefficient.
Figure 2Weekly intake of Pb and Cd by age and sex in relation to the provisional maximum weekly intake (µg). At the top is the Pb WI, and at the bottom is the Cd WI.
Figure 3Dietary risk coefficient of Pb and Cd intake by age and sex in relation to the upper safe limit of risk. At the top is the Pb DRC, and at the bottom is the Cd DRC.