| Literature DB >> 33426336 |
Andrews Obeng Affum1, Shiloh Dede Osae1, Edward Ebow Kwaansa-Ansah2, Michael K Miyittah3.
Abstract
Vegetables cultivated in soil irrigated with untreated groundwater and municipal-waste-dominated (MWD) stream can elevate the concentration of heavy metals (Cd, Fe, Zn, Hg, Cr, and Ni) in edible parts of the crop, affecting food safety and public health worldwide. This study assessed the quality, sources, and distribution of heavy metals in surface soils, MWD stream and groundwater, and edible tissues of leafy and non-leafy vegetables from a major urban farm in the Sekondi-Takoradi metropolis, Ghana. Human health risk due to exposure to the metals in frequently consumed vegetables were investigated. Indigenous leafy vegetables (Corchorus olitorious and Amaranthus spinosus), exotic leafy vegetables (Lactuca sativa, Brassica oleracea, and Brassica rapa), and non-leafy vegetables (Capsicum annum, Raphanus sativus, Daucus carota, and Allium cepa) were collected from the urban farm. The mean concentration of Cd, Hg, and Fe ranged from 0.008 - 0.027, 0.001-0.013, and 4.517-36.178 mg/kg fw in edible parts of non-leafy vegetables, respectively and 0.011-0.035, 0.002-0.011, and 3.617-13.695 mg/kg fw in exotic or indigenous leafy vegetables. The vegetables were less impacted with the metals if compared to similar vegetables produced from other urban farms, locally and in some countries in Africa, Asia, and Europe. Water resource on the farm were not suitable for vegetable crop irrigation since mean concentration of E. coli (200 cfu/mL), Hg (0.009 mg/L), and Cd (0.019 mg/L) in the MWD stream and 80 % of the groundwater sources exceeded the safe limits recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization. Geo-accumulation index for each metal in soil was ≤0, however, enrichment factor indicated a high anthropic enriched soil for Cr and Ni. Principal component analysis-multiple linear regression of the metals in soil identified mixed household waste/fertilizer, fertilizer, and crustal material as main sources for the heavy metal load in soil for which geogenic sources accounted for 74.3 %. Preferentially, Cd and Hg accumulated in Amaranthus spinosus, Daucus carota, and Corchorus olitorious. The estimated daily intake of each metal in the vegetables were below local and international daily dietary intake levels. At the 95th percentile concentration of each metal, target hazard quotient and the hazard index was <1 for adult male or female who consume the vegetables. Finally, appropriate agri-horticultural practices must be enforced to mitigate Cd, Ni, Cr, and Hg accumulation in the soil-vegetable system since the metals have profound adverse effect on human health.Entities:
Keywords: Heavy metals; Irrigation water; Risk assessment; Soil; Source apportionment; Vegetables
Year: 2020 PMID: 33426336 PMCID: PMC7785835 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Location map and schematic view of vegetable crop (Raphanus sativus, V1; Corchorus olitorious, V2; Amaranthus spinosa, V3; Daucus carota, V4; Brassica oleracea, V5; Brassica rapa, V6; Allium cepa, V7; Lactuca sativa, V8; and Capsicum annuum, V9), shallow wells (W1–W6), municipal-waste-dominated stream (SW4), and soil reference background sites (R1 - R3). in an urban vegetable farm in the Sekondi-Takoradi, Metropolis, Western Region, Ghana.
Physicochemical characteristics and concentration of heavy metals in soil around root zone of vegetable crops cultivated in an urban farm.
| Soil sample ID# | Physicochemical parameters of soil | Heavy metal concentration in soil (mean ± sd, mg/Kg) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | % TOC | % SOM | CEC | Cd | Fe | Hg | Cr | Ni | Zn | |
| S1 | 7.63 ± 0.00 | 5.63 ± 0.02 | 9.70 ± 0.00 | 27.69 ± 0.09 | <0.002 | 369.06 ± 0.02 | 0.073 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.00 | <0.001 | 1.71 ± 0.00 |
| S2 | 7.45 ± 0.07 | 4.81 ± 0.00 | 8.29 ± 0.00 | 20.22 ± 0.01 | 0.007 ± 0.00 | 294.57 ± 0.01 | 0.036 ± 0.00 | 1.47 ± 0.01 | <0.001 | 4.00 ± 0.00 |
| S3 | 7.50 ± 0.00 | 4.71 ± 0.01 | 8.13 ± 0.00 | 36.77 ± 0.00 | <0.002 | 294.24 ± 0.01 | 0.021 ± 0.01 | 2.15 ± 0.01 | <0.001 | 2.55 ± 0.01 |
| S4 | 7.65 ± 0.07 | 6.38 ± 0.00 | 10.99 ± 0.01 | 11.94 ± 0.00 | <0.002 | 293.87 ± 0.00 | 0.054 ± 0.01 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 5.05 ± 0.00 |
| S5 | 6.60 ± 0.07 | 6.97 ± 0.00 | 12.01 ± 0.00 | 10.93 ± 0.05 | <0.002 | 295.64 ± 0.02 | <0.002 | 2.51 ± 0.00 | <0.001 | 1.20 ± 0.00 |
| S6 | 7.40 ± 0.00 | 4.81 ± 0.00 | 8.29 ± 0.00 | 33.40 ± 0.00 | 0.013 ± 0.00 | 296.34 ± 0.00 | 0.120 ± 0.01 | 3.42 ± 0.00 | 0.460 ± 0.01 | 6.28 ± 0.00 |
| S7 | 6.80 ± 0.00 | 6.17 ± 0.00 | 10.64 ± 0.00 | 14.58 ± 0.01 | <0.002 | 297.00 ± 0.01 | 0.053 ± 0.01 | 3.73 ± 0.00 | <0.001 | 3.84 ± 0.01 |
| S8 | 7.65 ± 0.07 | 6.43 ± 0.00 | 11.09 ± 0.00 | 29.63 ± 0.00 | <0.002 | 294.72 ± 0.01 | 0.031 ± 0.00 | 1.58 ± 0.00 | <0001 | 1.91 ± 0.01 |
| S9 | 8.05 ± 0.07 | 5.81 ± 0.00 | 10.02 ± 0.00 | 18.80 ± 0.00 | <0.002 | 294.99 ± 0.00 | 0.011 ± 0.00 | 2.01 ± 0.01 | <0.001 | 2.67 ± 0.01 |
| BKG soil | 6.60 ± 0.07 | 5.86 ± 0.23 | 10.10 ± 0.38 | 20.03 ± 0.00 | <0.002 | 250 ± 0.00 | 0.032 ± 0.00 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.02 ± 0.01 |
| Min | 6.60 | 4.71 | 8.13 | 10.93 | <0.002 | 293.87 ± 0.00 | <0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.20 |
| Max | 8.05 | 6.97 | 12.01 | 36.77 | 0.013 | 369.06 | 0.120 | 3.73 | 0.460 | 6.28 |
| Mean | 7.41 ± 0.04 | 5.75 ± 0.00 | 9.91 ± 0.00 | 22.64 ± 0.02 | 0.002 ± 0.00 | 303.38 ± 0.01 | 0.044 ± 0.01 | 1.95 ± 0.00 | 0.051 ± 0.00 | 3.25 ± 0.00 |
| Literature SQG | 3a | 50000b | 0.07 | 100a | 50a | 300a | ||||
| Canadian SQGc | 1.4 | - | 6.6 | 64 | 45 | 200 | ||||
| US EPAd SQG | 0.77 | - | - | 2300 | ||||||
| Finlande SQG | 10.00 | 200 | 100 | 250 | ||||||
Soil samples S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, and S9 were collected around the root zone of Allium cepa, Amaranthus spinosus, Brassica oleracea, Brassica rapa, Capsicum annuum, Corchorus olitorious, Daucus carota, Lactuca sativa, and Raphanus sativus respectively. N = 9. Each value represents an average of a triplicate determination. Meaning of abbreviation: Soil Quality Guideline (SQG), Background (BKG).
aEwers (1991); bKabata-Pendias and Pendias (1992); cCCME (2007); dUS EPA (2018), and eMinistry of the Environment, Finland (2007).
Concentration of heavy metal and water content in fresh edible parts of leafy and non-leafy vegetable species produced from an urban farm.
| Plant species | Edible part | Water | Heavy metal concentration in edible part of vegetables (mean ± SD, (95th percentile), mg/kg fw) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Fe | Hg | Cr | Ni | Zn | |||
| Leafy vegetable | ||||||||
| leaf | 91.587 | 0.00027 ± 0.000 (0.027) | 36.178 ± 0.000 (36.178) | 0.009 ± 0.000 (0.093) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | 0.202 ± 0.000 (0.202) | |
| leaf | 92.453 | 0.024 ± 0.000 (0.024) | 27.582 ± 0.000 (27.584) | 0.013 ± 0.000 (0.131) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | |
| leaf | 94.358 | 0.018 ± 0.000 (0.018) | 5.877 ± 0.020 (5.910) | 0.001 ± 0.000 (0.001) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | 0.079 ± 0.000 (0.079) | |
| leaf | 96.243 | 0.008 ± 0.000 (0.008) | 4.517 ± 0.010 (4.534) | 0.003 ± 0.000 (0.003) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | |
| leaf | 96.066 | 0.014 ± 0.000 (0.014) | 16.520 ± 0.000 (16.520) | 0.002 ± 0.000 (0.002) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | 0.057 ± 0.010 (0.075) | |
| Non-leafy vegetable | ||||||||
| root | 92.747 | 0.035 ± 0.010 (0.053) | 13.695 ± 0.010 (13.711) | 0.011 ± 0.000 (0.112) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | |
| root | 94.951 | 0.014 ± 0.000 (0.014) | 4.625 ± 0.020 (4.658) | 0.004 ± 0.000 (0.004) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | |
| whole | 93.178 | 0.011 ± 0.000 (0.011) | 7.294 ± 0.100 (7.460) | 0.002 ± 0.000 (0.002) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | 0.071 ± 0.010 (0.089) | |
| fruit | 91.986 | 0.022 ± 0.000 (0.023) | 3.617 ± 0.000 (3.617) | 0.004 ± 0.000 (0.004) | <0.001 (0.000) | <0.001 (0.000) | 0.093 ± 0.000 (0.093) | |
| LOD | 0.002 | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||
| Min | 0.008 | 3.617 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Max | 0.035 | 36.178 | 0.013 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.202 | ||
| Mean | 0.019 ± 0.000 | 13.323 ± 0.01 | 0.039 ± 0.00 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.055 ± 0.000 | ||
| Guideline limit | 0.05/0.20b | 425a | 0.1b | 2.3b | 67a | 100a | ||
Relative standard deviation (RSD) of the concentration of Cd, Fe, Hg, Cr, Ni, and Zn was less than 10 %. N = 9. Meaning of abbreviation: fresh weight (fw). Each value represents an average of a triplicate. Bigdeli and Seilsepour (2008)a and FAO/WHO (2001)b. Indigenous leafy vegetable∗ and exotic leafy vegetable‡.
Irrigation water indicator values and concentration of heavy metals in municipal-waste-dominated stream and groundwater applied to soil in an urban vegetable farm.
| ID # | Irrigation water source | Concentration of heavy metals (mg/L) | Irrigation water quality indices | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Fe | Hg | Cr | Ni | Zn | SAR | SSP (%) | RSC (meq/L) | PI | MAR | KR | ESP | ||
| W1 | Shallow Well | 0.022 ± 0.010 | 3.198 ± 0.000 | 0.008 ± 0.000 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.73 | 58.81 | -0.42 | 77.45 | 67.12 | 1.12 | 1.27 |
| W2 | Shallow well | 0.020 ± 0.000 | 0.842 ± 0.010 | 0.005 ± 0.000 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.93 | 67.51 | -0.47 | 80.33 | 78.13 | 1.49 | 1.56 |
| W3 | Shallow well | 0.020 ± 0.010 | 1.682 ± 0.010 | 0.010 ± 0.000 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 5.22 | 58.94 | -7.57 | 59.38 | 92.25 | 1.23 | 6.03 |
| SW4 | Stream | 0.018 ± 0.000 | 1.622 ± 0.000 | 0.008 ± 0.000 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 4.29 | 61.34 | -3.37 | 65.52 | 85.45 | 1.39 | 4.81 |
| W5 | Shallow well | 0.016 ± 0.000 | 2.404 ± 0.000 | 0.013 ± 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 4.98 | 62.51 | -4.22 | 65.49 | 85.59 | 1.45 | 5.71 |
| W6 | Shallow well | 0.002 ± 0.000 | 3.552 ± 0.010 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 3.86 | 62.22 | -2.71 | 66.48 | 85.90 | 1.41 | 4.23 |
| Mean | 0.016 ± 0.000 | 2.217 ± 0.005 | 0.007 ± 0.000 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 3.67 | 61.89 | -3.13 | 69.11 | 82.41 | 1.35 | 3.67 | |
| Min | 0.002 | 0.842 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.73 | 58.81 | -7.57 | 65.49 | 67.12 | 1.12 | 1.27 | |
| Max | 0.022 | 3.552 | 0.013 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 5.22 | 67.51 | -0.42 | 80.33 | 92.25 | 1.49 | 6.03 | |
| DL | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.0005 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| ∗FAO | 0.01 | 5.0 | 0.001 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
FAO irrigation water guideline limits adapted from Ayers and Wescot (1985)∗. Meaning of abbreviations: sodium adsorption ration (SAR); sodium soluble percentage (SSP); residual sodium carbonate (RSC); Kelly ratio (KR); permeability index (PI); magnesium adsorption ratio (MAR), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP); and not applicable (-).
Varimax rotated factor loadings and source profile of heavy metal species in the soil obtained by the PCA-MLR model.
| Metal species | Factors | Communalities | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC 1 | FC 2 | FC 3 | ||
| Cd | -0.088 | 0.275 | 0.856 | |
| Fe | 0.007 | -0.278 | 0.984 | |
| Hg | 0.323 | -0.014 | 0.942 | |
| Cr | 0.160 | -0.271 | 0.954 | |
| Zn | -0.406 | -0.092 | 0.940 | |
| Ni | 0.029 | 0.388 | 0.925 | |
| Eigenvalues | 3.177 | 1.258 | 1.167 | |
| % of variance | 52.946 | 20.963 | 19.446 | |
| Cumulative % | 52.946 | 73.909 | 93.355 | |
| Household waste and fertilizer | Crustal material | fertilizer | ||
Factors have eigenvalues greater than 1. Factor loadings greater than 0.7 are highlighted.
Figure 2PCA-MLR source contribution plot for soil used to cultivate leafy and non-leafy vegetable crops in an urban farm.
Bioconcentration factor (BCF) for heavy metal species in leafy and non-leafy vegetables produced from an urban farm.
| Vegetable | Bioconcentration factor | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Fe | Hg | Cr | Ni | Zn | ||
| 4.04 | 0.12 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 6.79 | |
| 1.81 | 0.09 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 | |
| 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.10 | |
| 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | |
| 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.14 | |
| 0.00 | 0.05 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.11 | |
| 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 | |
| 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.09 | |
| 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.09 | |
Estimated daily intake of heavy metal species from the consumption of leafy and non-leafy vegetables.
| Vegetable | Estimated daily intake (EDI) of vegetable (μg/day/person) | Target hazard quotient (THQ) | Hazard index (HI) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Fe | Hg | Cr | Ni | Zn | Cd | Fe | Hg | Cr | Ni | Zn | ||
| 1.54E+00 | 2.07E+03 | 5.33E+00 | 2.40E-03 | 2.40E-03 | 1.15E+01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.09 | |
| 1.38E+00 | 1.58E+03 | 7.50E+00 | 2.16E-03 | 2.16E-03 | 2.16E-03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | |
| 6.45E-01 | 2.10E+02 | 4.03E-02 | 1.01E-03 | 1.01E-03 | 2.82E+00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2.68E-01 | 1.61E+02 | 1.21E-01 | 6.71E-04 | 6.71E-04 | 6.71E-04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1.82E-01 | 2.12E+02 | 2.02E-02 | 2.53E-04 | 2.53E-04 | 7.28E-01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1.60E-01 | 2.58E+01 | 2.86E-02 | 2.86E-04 | 2.86E-04 | 6.64E-01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Total | 4.17 | 4.25E+04 | 1.31E+02 | 1.00E-02 | 1.00E-02 | 1.58E+01 | |||||||
| RDA | 10–20c | 8000c | 40d | 25–35c | 70–260c | 8000–11000c | |||||||
| UL | 65c | 45000c | 46c | - | 1000c | 40000c | |||||||
Meaning of abbreviations: Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA); Tolerable Upper Dietary Intake level (UL); Not available (-); The EDI and THQ for Raphanus sativus, Allium cepa and Daucus carota was not determined because poor data on consumption amount.
Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine (2004). Dietary reference intakes: Tolerable Upper Intake Levels, Elements. National Academy of Sciencesc; WHO (1993)d.