| Literature DB >> 35736765 |
Ahmed A Qahtan1, Mohammad Faisal1, Abdulrahman A Alatar1, Eslam M Abdel-Salam2.
Abstract
Efficient methods for callus induction and the high-frequency plant regeneration of Ruta chalepensis L. were established, and the phytochemical potential and antioxidant activity of a donor plant, ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants, and callus were also studied. Yellowish-green callus was induced with a frequency of 97.8% from internode shoot segments of the donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 10 μM 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) and 1 μM BA (6-benzyladenine). Adventitious shoots were regenerated from the yellowish-green callus on MS medium containing 5.0 μM (BA) and 1.0 μM 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), with a regeneration frequency of 98.4% and a maximum of 54.6 shoots with an average length of 4.5 cm after 8 weeks. The regenerated shoots were rooted in a medium containing 1.0 μM IBA (indole-3-butyric acid) and successfully transferred to ex vitro conditions in pots containing normal garden soil, with a 95% survival rate. The amounts of alkaloids, phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, and antioxidant activity of the ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants were higher than in the donor plant and callus. The highest contents of hesperidin and rutin (93.3 and 55.9 µg/mg, respectively) were found in the ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants compared to those obtained from the donor plant (91.4 and 31.0 µg/mg, respectively) and callus (59.1 and 21.6 µg/mg, respectively). The genetic uniformity of the ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants was appraised by the ISSR markers and compared with the donor plant. This is the first report describing the callus-mediated plant regeneration, as well as the production of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities in R. chalepensis, which might be a potential alternative technique for the mass propagation and synthesis of bioactive compounds such as hesperidin and rutin.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; callus culture; in vitro regeneration; medicinal plants; phenolic compounds; plant growth regulators
Year: 2022 PMID: 35736765 PMCID: PMC9229613 DOI: 10.3390/plants11121614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Effect of 2,4-D alone or in combination with BA or Kin on callus induction, fresh, and dry weight of callus from internodes after 6 weeks of culture.
| PGRs (μM) | Response % | FW (mg) | DW (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| 1.0 µM 2,4-D | 71.23 ± 0.74 f | 92.11 ± 1.66 i | 9.66 ± 0.21 h |
| 2.5 µM 2,4-D | 79.61 ± 0.75 e | 192.15 ± 0.99 g | 18.82 ± 0.44 g |
| 5.0 µM 2,4-D | 91.23 ± 0.82 c | 285.35 ± 1.52 f | 26.12 ± 0.62 f |
| 10 µM 2,4-D | 94.46 ± 0.83 b | 391.15 ± 2.24 e | 37.45 ± 0.69 e |
| 20 µM 2,4-D | 79.20 ± 1.69 e | 178.12 ± 4.4 h | 16.43 ± 0.47 h |
| 10 µM 2,4-D + 1.0 µM BA | 97.82 ± 0.86 a | 672.52 ± 0.23 a | 68.61 ± 0.51 a |
| 10 µM 2,4-D + 2.5 µM BA | 95.66 ± 1.36 b | 484.03 ± 1.11 b | 49.24 ± 0.59 b |
| 10 µM 2,4-D + 1.0 µM Kin | 81.03 ± 0.89 e | 372.12 ± 1.94 d | 39.02 ± 0.99 d |
| 10 µM 2,4-D + 2.5 µM Kin | 84.65 ± 1.44 d | 429.76 ± 2.93 c | 45.14 ± 1.36 c |
Values are means ± SEM, n = 20 per treatment group. Means in a column without a common superscript letter differ (p < 0.05), as analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Duncan test.
Figure 1Callus induction and shoot bud induction and multiplication of R. chalepensis. (A). Callus induction in internodal explants on MS with 2,4-D (10.0 µM) + BA (1.0 µM) (B). Shoot bud initiation from callus on MS with BA (5.0 µM) + NAA (1.0 µM) (C). Multiple shoot induction from on MS with BA (5.0 µM) + NAA (1.0 µM) after four weeks of culture (D). Shoot proliferation on MS with BA (5.0 µM) + NAA (1.0 µM) after eight weeks of culture.
Effect of cytokinins on shoot multiplication in callus mass obtained from internodal explants after 8 weeks of culture.
| Cytokinins (μM) | Response % | Mean Number of Shoots | Mean Shoot Length (cm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BA | Kin | |||
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 h | 0.0 ± 0.0 h | 0.0 ± 0.0 h |
| 1.0 | - | 73.26 ± 0.92 d | 21.83 ± 0.58 fg | 2.28 ± 0.09 ef |
| 2.5 | - | 79.43 ± 0.79 b | 25.07 ± 0.83 cd | 2.86 ± 0.12 c |
| 5.0 | - | 85.54 ± 0.58 a | 30.43 ± 0.51 a | 3.98 ± 0.11 a |
| 7.5 | - | 80.92 ± 0.65 b | 27.23 ± 0.58 b | 3.24 ± 0.11 b |
| 10.0 | - | 74.33 ± 0.98 cd | 23.84 ± 0.37 de | 2.42 ± 0.17 de |
| - | 1.0 | 66.03 ± 0.83 f | 17.86 ± 0.13 i | 2.04 ± 0.10 f |
| - | 2.5 | 75.04 ± 0.83 cd | 20.68 ± 0.67 gh | 2.71 ± 0.14 cd |
| - | 5.0 | 80.34 ± 0.59 b | 26.48 ± 0.74 bc | 3.58 ± 0.16 a |
| - | 7.5 | 75.76 ± 0.92 c | 23.24 ± 0.37 ef | 2.91 ± 0.14 c |
| - | 10.0 | 70.44 ± 0.42 e | 19.67 ± 0.92 h | 2.08 ± 0.17 f |
Values are means ± SEM, n = 20 per treatment group. Means in a column without a common superscript letter differ (p < 0.05), as analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Duncan test.
Effect of auxins (IAA or IBA) with optimal concentrations of BA (5.0 μM) and Kin (5.0 μM) on shoot multiplication in callus mass obtained from internodal explants after 8 weeks of culture.
| BA | Kin | NAA | IAA | IBA | Response % | Mean Number of Shoots | Mean Shoot Length (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | - | 0.0 | - | - | 85.54 ± 0.58 d | 30.42 ± 0.51 jkl | 3.90 ± 0.11 bf |
| 5.0 | - | 0.5 | - | - | 90.22 ± 0.67 c | 41.23 ± 0.86 bc | 3.74 ± 0.11 defg |
| 5.0 | - | 1.0 | - | - | 98.44 ± 0.51 a | 54.63 ± 1.54 a | 4.54 ± 0.05 a |
| 5.0 | - | 1.5 | - | - | 92.48 ± 0.69 b | 42.84 ± 1.16 b | 4.26 ± 0.08 ab |
| 5.0 | - | 2.0 | - | - | 79.23 ± 0.62 ef | 28.47 ± 0.92 km | 3.58 ± 0.15 efh |
| 5.0 | - | - | 0.5 | - | 79.64 ± 0.51 ef | 33.42 ± 1.03 fi | 3.24 ± 0.18 hijk |
| 5.0 | - | - | 1.0 | - | 91.73 ± 0.71 bc | 43.67 ± 1.21 b | 4.32 ± 0.10 ab |
| 5.0 | - | - | 1.5 | - | 85.64 ± 0.62 d | 37.23 ± 1.24 de | 3.94 ± 0.27 be |
| 5.0 | - | - | 2.0 | - | 79.54 ± 0.69 ef | 27.81 ± 0.97 lm | 3.36 ± 0.18 ghij |
| 5.0 | - | - | - | 0.5 | 76.41 ± 0.89 gh | 30.25 ± 0.73 jkl | 3.04 ± 0.22 jl |
| 5.0 | - | - | - | 1.0 | 84.83 ± 0.66 d | 39.46 ± 0.51 cd | 4.04 ± 0.05 bd |
| 5.0 | - | - | - | 1.5 | 77.85 ± 0.86 fg | 31.81 ± 1.24 ghij | 2.96 ± 0.05 jl |
| 5.0 | - | - | - | 2.0 | 69.87 ± 0.86 ij | 26.81 ± 1.53 m | 2.78 ± 0.11 l |
| - | 5.0 | 0.5 | - | - | 79.67 ± 0.92 ef | 33.86 ± 0.86 fh | 3.57 ± 0.070 fi |
| - | 5.0 | 1.0 | - | - | 90.95 ± 0.71 c | 41.82 ± 1.28 bc | 4.37 ± 0.083 ab |
| - | 5.0 | 1.5 | - | - | 81.21 ± 0.86 e | 34.80 ± 1.16 ef | 3.94 ± 0.068 be |
| - | 5.0 | 2.0 | - | - | 75.57 ± 0.56 h | 30.83 ± 0.66 ikl | 3.48 ± 0.13 fi |
| - | 5.0 | - | 0.5 | - | 75.46 ± 0.47 h | 30.07 ± 0.83 jkl | 3.08 ± 0.12 il |
| - | 5.0 | - | 1.0 | - | 84.62 ± 0.68 d | 35.71 ± 0.70 ef | 4.18 ± 0.10 abc |
| - | 5.0 | - | 1.5 | - | 80.12 ± 0.63 e | 31.23 ± 0.58 hik | 3.84 ± 0.22 cdef |
| - | 5.0 | - | 2.0 | - | 70.76 ± 0.58 i | 28.68 ± 0.74 km | 3.12 ± 0.12 il |
| - | 5.0 | - | - | 0.5 | 70.36 ± 0.54 ij | 29.48 ± 0.67 jkm | 2.98 ± 0.14 jl |
| - | 5.0 | - | - | 1.0 | 81.29 ± 0.67 e | 34.61 ± 0.51 efg | 3.94 ± 0.12 be |
| - | 5.0 | - | - | 1.5 | 71.84 ± 1.04 i | 31.23 ± 0.66 hik | 2.94 ± 0.11 kl |
| - | 5.0 | - | - | 2.0 | 68.21 ± 1.10 j | 27.85 ± 1.16 lm | 2.74 ± 0.14 l |
Values are means ± SEM, n = 20 per treatment group. Means in a column without a common superscript letter differ (p < 0.05), as analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Duncan test.
Figure 2(A). In-vitro-rooted plants of R. chalepensis before transplantation (B). Ex-vitro-established micropropagated R. chalepensis plants after 4 months of transfer.
Total polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins, and alkaloids in methanolic and ethanolic extracts from donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden, ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants, and callus of R. chalepensis.
| Phytochemicals | DP * | MP ** | Callus *** |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total polyphenols (mg GAE/g DW) | 94.75 ± 0.09 b | 143.92 ± 0.16 a | 53.11 ± 0.33 c |
| Flavonoids (mg QE/g DW) | 90.10 ± 0.57 b | 135.86 ± 0.87 a | 86.31 ± 0.61 c |
| Tannins (mg TAE/g DW) | 44.31 ± 1.07 b | 54.39 ± 0.09 a | 36.64 ± 0.85 c |
| Alkaloids % | 8.96 ± 0.16 b | 10.79 ± 0.21 a | 7.96 ± 0.23 c |
Values are means ± SEM, n = 3 per treatment group. * DP = donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden; ** MP = ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants; *** callus = callus obtained on MS + 2,4-D (10 µM) + BA(1.0 µM). Means in a row without a common superscript letter differ (p < 0.05), as analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Duncan test.
Radical scavenging activity (%) of R. chalepensis donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden, ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants, and callus obtained from MS + 2,4-D (10 µM) + BA (1.0 µM).
| Concentrations (µg/mL) | DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| DP * | MP ** | Callus *** | |
| 200 | 76.01 ± 0.11 e | 78.79 ± 0.03 e | 35.83 ± 0.16 d |
| 400 | 82.16 ± 0.02 c | 88.12 ± 0.02 b | 46.94 ± 0.05 e |
| 600 | 88.94 ± 0.09 a | 91.23 ± 0.12 a | 50.91 ± 0.14 c |
| 800 | 87.38 ± 0.27 b | 85.27 ± 0.02 c | 60.42 ± 0.22 b |
| 1000 | 80.41 ± 0.11 d | 82.33 ± 0.03 d | 72.91 ± 0.28 a |
Values are means ± SEM, n = 3 per treatment group. * DP = donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden; ** MP = ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants; *** callus = callus obtained on MS + 2,4-D (10 µM) + BA(1.0 µM). Means in a row without a common superscript letter differ (p < 0.05), as analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Duncan test.
GC–MS analysis of R. chalepensis methanol extracts of the donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden, ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants, and callus obtained from MS + 2,4-D (10 µM) + BA (1.0 µM).
| S. No. | RT * (min) | Name of Compound | Area % | Molecular Weight (g/mol) | Structural Formula | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DP * | MP ** | Callus *** | |||||
| 1 | 9.303 | 1-Ethyl-2-pyrrolidinone | 0.88 | - | - | 113.084 | C6H11NO |
| 2 | 17.767 | 4-(3,4-Methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-butanone | 1.24 | - | - | 192.079 | C11H12O3 |
| 3 | 20.082 | 2-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)phenol | 1.21 | - | - | 154.063 | C8H10O3 |
| 4 | 20.762 | Oleyl Alcohol | 0.99 | - | - | 268.277 | C18H36O |
| 5 | 23.027 | 7-Hydroxy-3-phenyl-2-thioxo-1,3-diazabicyclo(3.3.0)octan-4-one | 4.65 | - | - | 248.062 | C12H12N2O2S |
| 6 | 24.444 | p-Dimethylaminobenzylidene p-anisidine | 21.55 | - | - | 254.142 | C16H18N2O |
| 7 | 26.894 | Kokusaginine | 24.22 | - | 11.75 | 259.084 | C14H13NO4 |
| 8 | 28.043 | 1H-Indole,1-(trimethylsilyl)-5-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]- | 1.19 | - | - | 277.132 | C14H23NOSi2 |
| 9 | 28.437 | Podocarpa-8,11,13-trien-3-one, 13-isopropyl-12-methoxy- | 40.74 | 27.60 | - | 314.225 | C21H30O2 |
| 10 | 29.226 | 3-Phenylthiolane,S,S-dioxide | 1.21 | - | - | 196.056 | C10H12O2S |
| 11 | 30.878 | Arborinine | 2.14 | - | - | 285.100 | C16H15NO4 |
| 12 | 3.179 | 9,17-Octadecadienal, (Z)- | - | 1.97 | - | 264.245 | C18H32O |
| 13 | 20.762 | Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane, 2,6,6-trimethyl-, (1.alpha.,2.beta.,5.alpha.)- | - | 3.50 | - | 138.141 | C10H18 |
| 14 | 21.047 | Bicyclo[3.3.0]octan-3-one, 8-chloro- | - | 1.09 | - | 158.05 | C8H11ClO |
| 15 | 21.257 | Bicyclo[4.1.0]heptane, 3-methyl- | - | 1.54 | - | 110.11 | C8H14 |
| 16 | 22.213 | 2-Propenamide, N-cyclopropyl-3-(2-fluorophenyl)-, (E)- | - | 1.26 | - | 205.09 | C12H12FNO |
| 17 | 23.043 | 3-Adamantan-1-yl-heptan-4-one | - | 1.86 | - | 248.214 | C17H28O |
| 18 | 23.471 | 7H-Furo[3,2-g][ | - | 8.87 | - | 216.190 | C12H8O4 |
| 19 | 23.664 | Phytol | - | 5.14 | - | 296.308 | C20H40O |
| 20 | 24.025 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)- | - | 1.54 | - | 278.225 | C18H30O2 |
| 21 | 24.1 | 2(1H)-Naphthalenone, octahydro-8a-hydroxy-4a-methyl- | - | 1.95 | - | 182.131 | C11H18O2 |
| 22 | 24.436 | 9H-Thioxanthen-9-one, 2-(1-methylethyl)- | - | 38.72 | - | 254.077 | C16H14OS |
| 23 | 24.948 | Trioxsalen | - | 3.71 | - | 228.079 | C14H12O3 |
| 24 | 31.893 | dl-.alpha.-Tocopherol | - | 1.26 | - | 430.381 | C29H50O2 |
| 25 | 17.364 | 4-Methyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde | - | - | 4.22 | 180.079 | C10H12O3 |
| 26 | 21.752 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | - | - | 2.60 | 270.256 | C17H34O2 |
| 27 | 21.995 | Benzenepropanoic acid, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-, methyl ester | - | - | 2.11 | 292.204 | C18H28O3 |
| 28 | 22.238 | Dictamnine | - | - | 8.84 | 199.063 | C12H9NO2 |
| 29 | 23.664 | Methoxsalen | - | - | 6.05 | 216.192 | C12H8O4 |
| 30 | 24.444 | 2-Ethoxy-10H-acridin-9-one | - | - | 46.84 | 239.095 | C15H13NO2 |
| 31 | 25.015 | 2-(n-Propylethanimidoyl)-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione | - | - | 3.36 | 229.11 | C14H15NO2 |
| 32 | 25.199 | 7H-Furo[3,2-g][ | - | - | 1.22 | 246.053 | C13H10O5 |
| 33 | 25.501 | Naphtho[1,2-b]furan-2(3H)-one, 5-methyl-4-phenyl- | - | - | 1.61 | 274.099 | C19H14O2 |
| 34 | 25.787 | 2,11-Dimethyl-2,3,4,5,6,7-hexahydro-1H-2-benzazonine | - | - | 1.48 | 203.167 | C14H21N |
| 35 | 26.558 | Indole-5-carboxylic acid, 1,2,3-trimethyl- | - | - | 2.20 | 203.095 | C12H13NO2 |
| 36 | 28.463 | Furo[2,3-b]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid, 6,7-dihydro-3-amino-4-methoxy-6-oxo-, phenyl ester | - | - | 4.77 | 300.075 | C15H12N2O5 |
| 37 | 29.243 | trans-4-Dimethylamino-4’-methoxychalcone | - | - | 2.96 | 281.142 | C18H19NO2 |
* Rt—retention time; * DP = donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden; ** MP = ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants; *** callus = callus obtained on MS + 2,4-D (10 µM) + BA(1.0 µM).
Figure 3Cluster heatmap analysis based on the relative levels of phytochemicals measured by GC–MS in R. chalepensis. The magnitude and direction of the correlations are shown by the colors in the matrix boxes. * DP = donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden; ** MP = ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants; *** callus = callus obtained on MS + 2,4-D (10 µM) + BA(1.0 µM).
Rutin and hesperidin content (µg/mg DW) in methanol extracts of R. chalepensis.
| Rutin (µg/mg DW) | Hesperidin (µg/mg DW) | |
|---|---|---|
| DP * | 31.03 ± 1.55 b | 91.44 ± 1.75 a |
| MP ** | 55.90 ± 2.04 a | 93.30 ± 1.48 a |
| Callus *** | 21.60 ± 0.97 c | 59.11 ± 1.22 b |
* D = donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden; ** MP = ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants; *** callus = callus obtained on MS + 2,4-D (10 µM) + BA(1.0 µM). Means in a column without a common superscript letter differ (p < 0.05), as analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Duncan test
Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) primers used to evaluate the genetic fidelity of ex-vitro-established micropropagated R. chalepensis plants.
| Names of Primers | Sequence 5′–3′ | Ta (°C) * | No. of Bands |
|---|---|---|---|
| UBC-825 | ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CT | 46 | 14 |
| UBC-827 | ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CG | 50 | 16 |
| UBC-834 | AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GYT | 50 | 09 |
| UBC-841 | GAG AGA GAG AGA GAG AYC | 50 | 14 |
| UBC-855 | ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CYT | 50 | 15 |
| UBC-866 | CTC CTC CTC CTC CTC CTC | 55 | 13 |
| UBC-868 | GAA GAA GAA GAA GAA GAA | 46 | 12 |
| UBC-880 | GGG TGG GGT GGG GTG | 50 | 13 |
| UBC-889 | DBD ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA C | 46 | 15 |
| UBC-891 | HVH TGT GTG TGT GTG TG | 46 | 10 |
| Total no. of bands | 131 | ||
| Average no. of bands /primers | 13.1 |
* Ta: annealing temperature.
Figure 4Representative ISSR profiles of Ruta chalepensis using primer UBC-827. Lane M—lambda DNA/EcoRI+HindIII marker; lanes 1–10 randomly selected ex-vitro-established micropropagated plants; lane DP—donor plant growing in soil in the botanical garden.