| Literature DB >> 35735530 |
Yujiao Sun1, Xue Wang2, Hao Zhang1,2.
Abstract
An electrochemical sensor using silver nanowires (AgNWs)-doped with a zeolite-like metal-organic framework (ZIF-67) was developed for highly sensitive and stable determination of folic acid (FA). The ZIF-67/AgNWs nanocomposite was prepared by a one-step reaction via a template method and drop-coated onto the surface of a screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) to form a ZIF-67/AgNWs@SPCE electrochemical sensing platform. The electrochemical square wave voltammetry (SWV) curve for this sensing platform was measured in an electrolyte solution containing FA under the optimum experimental conditions. The redox peak current of FA (IFA) increased with increases in the FA concentration (CFA). There was a linear relationship between IFA and CFA in the range of 0.1 μM to 10 μM, and the determination limit was 30 nM. The ZIF-67/AgNWs@SPCE was used as an electrochemical sensor for FA which maintained a good stability over 7 days and showed good determination performance in real samples with a high recovery rate (100.9-102.1%, n = 6).Entities:
Keywords: electrochemical sensor; folic acid; metal–organic framework; stability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35735530 PMCID: PMC9221106 DOI: 10.3390/bios12060382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Scheme 1Manufacturing process for the ZIF−67/AgNWs@SPCE sensing platform and its application to FA determination.
Figure 1SEM images of ZIF-67 (a), ZIF-67/AgNWs (b), and AgNWs (c). Insets show enlargements of the SEM images for ZIF-67 (a) and ZIF-67/AgNWs (b).
Figure 2(a) UV−vis spectra, (b) Raman spectra, (c) FT–IR spectra, (d) XRD patterns, and (e) full-scan XPS spectra of ZIF−67 and ZIF−67/AgNWs. (f) High-resolution XPS spectrum of Co 2p.
Figure 3CV curves (a) and EIS (b) curves for bare SPCE and SPCE modified with ZIF−67 and ZIF−67/AgNWs. Electrolyte solution containing [Fe (CN)6]3−/4− (1 mM) as an electrochemical signal probe.
Figure 4(a,b) SWV curves of the ZIF−67/AgNWs@SPCE sensing platform with different concentrations of FA. (c) Linear relationship between IFA and CFA from 0.1 μM to 10 μM.
Figure 5IFA measured from SWV curves of ZIF-67/AgNWs@SPCE in the presence of FA (1 μM) and 0.1 mM of each interfering substance. Current percentage (%) = (I0 − I)/I0 × 100%, where I0 represents the IFA detected without the addition of FA (control), and I was measured with addition of FA (1 μM) or each interfering substance (0.1 mM). Mixture indicates all interfering substance and FA. All measurements were repeated six times.
Figure 6Twenty scans performed for the SWV measurements (a). Current response to FA after the sensor was left for a long time (b). The concentration of FA was 10 μM. Error bars represent the standard deviations for three measurements.
Determination of FA in human serum samples using the electrochemical sensor. All experiments were performed six times.
| a Sample | Spiked/μM | b Detected/μM | c RSD/% | Recovery/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum 1 | 0 | Not Found | - | - |
| Serum 2 | 1 | 1.021 ± 0.02510 | 2.459 | 102.1 |
| Serum 3 | 10 | 10.09 ± 0.3092 | 3.065 | 100.9 |
a Samples were prepared by diluting purchased human serum samples 10-fold with PBS (1 mM, pH 7.4). b All results are expressed as the mean (n = 6) ± the standard deviation. c The relative standard deviation (RSD) was calculated as (SD/average) × 100.
Comparison of different methods for FA determination.
| Electrode | Modifier | Linear Range/μM | LOD/μM | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPE | Co3O4/RGO/PEI/CD | 19–94 | 19 | [ |
| GCE | AuNCs/AGR/MWCNT | 10–170 | 0.09 | [ |
| GCE | ZrO2/ZnO | 2–480 | 0.037 | [ |
| CPE | CdO/SWCNTs/DPIB | 0.1–1200 | 0.06 | [ |
| CPE | ZnO/CNTs/BCB | 3–700 | 1 | [ |
| GCE | DHB/AuNPs/RGO | 1–500 | 0.6 | [ |
| PE | NiCo2S4/rGO | 0.1–3600 | 0.0016 | [ |
| GCE | f-MWCNT-Ni (OH)2-Si4Pic+Cl− | 0.5–26 | 0.095 | [ |
| SPCE | ZIF-67/AgNWs | 0.1–10 | 0.03 | This work |
Abbreviations: CPE, carbon paste electrode; PE, paper electrode; SWCNTs, single-wall carbon nanotubes; DPIB, 1,3-dipropylimidazolium bromide; SPCE, screen-printed carbon electrode; MWCNTs, multi-walled carbon nanotubes; AGR, activation of graphene; BCB, 4,5-bis(4-chloroanilino)-1,2-benzendiol; DHB, 2-(3-dihydroxy phenyl) benzothiazole; Si4Pic+Cl−, inorganic ionic silsesquioxane polymer.