Literature DB >> 35734056

Clinical anatomy of superior laryngeal artery via transoral approach.

Junxiao Jia1, Junbo Zhang1, Zhengang Zeng1, Hong Shen1, Chengyuan Wang2, Jian Chen2, Shuifang Xiao1.   

Abstract

Objective: Hemorrhage is the most common complication caused by transoral laryngopharyngeal surgery. It is believed that proper management of the superior laryngeal artery (SLA), the main feeding artery for the larynx and pharynx, may reduce intra- and postoperative hemorrhage incidence. The aim of this study was to illustrate the anatomy of the SLA via transoral endoscopic approach.
Methods: Fourteen sides of SLA from heads of seven fresh-frozen and silicone-injected cadavers were dissected. Transoral dissections were performed for the intra-laryngeal segment of SLA, and transcervical dissections were performed to confirm the anatomical measurements.
Results: SLA had a slightly descending course from the origin to the larynx, and there was a major branch supplying the epiglottis, named pharyngo-epiglottic artery (PEA). Parallel with the internal superior laryngeal nerve (ISLN), SLA passed through the thyrohyoid membrane and ended into the hypopharynx. The distance from SLA to the superior horn of thyroid cartilage (SHTC) was (9.11 ± 0.58)mm on the left and (9.01 ± 0.37)mm on the right; the distance from SLA to the inferior margin of the hyoid bone (IMHB) was (2.00 ± 0.11)mm on the left and (1.95 ± 0.08)mm on the right; the distance from SLA to ISLN was (5.98 ± 0.48)mm on the left and (5.78 ± 0.36)mm on the right. No significant difference was found between bilateral sides (p > 0.05). Moreover, the distance from SLA to superior margin of thyroid cartilage (SMTC) was (5.52 ± 0.24)mm on the left and (5.80 ± 0.15)mm on the right. A significant difference was also found between bilateral sides (p = 0.03), which might suggest the SLA is located further from the SMTC on the right side.
Conclusion: SHTC, SMTC, and IMHB could be regarded as anatomical landmarks to locate SLA when applying a transoral approach. Moreover, a complete understanding of the detailed anatomy of the superior laryngeal artery may improve the detection of hemostasis in transoral laryngeal or hypo-pharyngeal surgery.
© 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomical landmark; anatomy; superior laryngeal artery; transoral approach

Year:  2022        PMID: 35734056      PMCID: PMC9194964          DOI: 10.1002/lio2.781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol        ISSN: 2378-8038


INTRODUCTION

Transoral surgery (TOS) includes transoral laser surgery (TOLS), transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS), transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and transoral radiofrequency coblation surgery (TRS). , In 1975, Strong et al. introduced the TOLS for the treatment of laryngeal carcinoma. Since then, TOS has been widely used to treat early, advanced, or recurrent laryngeal carcinoma, obtaining excellent outcomes and providing safety in terms of organ preservation and local control. , However, postoperative hemorrhage is the most common complication after TOS, with an incidence of 3.1%–7.5%. , , The incidence of postoperative hemorrhage in the supra‐glottic laryngeal carcinoma has been reported to vary from 7% to 8.5%. , In some cases, severe bleeding may lead to patient's death. The superior laryngeal artery (SLA) is the main feeding artery for the larynx and pharynx. It is believed that proper management of the SLA via transoral approach may reduce intra‐ and postoperative hemorrhage incidence. Yet, the transoral anatomy of SLA remains poorly understood. In this study, we used a transoral approach to further explain the detailed anatomy of SLA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimen preparation

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University First Hospital. The anatomical dissections were conducted at the anatomy center in Peking University First Hospital. The specimens were collected from voluntary body donations to the Peking University First Hospital. In our study, we used 14 sides of SLA from heads of seven adult male fresh‐frozen and silicone‐injected cadavers with no history of trauma, surgery, and congenital malformation. Transoral dissections were assisted by an endoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), suspension laryngoscope including the duck‐billed and Feyh‐Kastenbauer suspension laryngoscope, and microdissection instruments.

Anatomic dissection

Specimens were dissected using a transoral approach, and transcervical dissections were performed to confirm our anatomic measurements. In the transoral approach, the dissections were performed with the help of a suspension laryngoscope, using a superficial‐to‐deep method with endoscopic photo‐documentation at each layer, and carefully protecting the underlying structures. The distance was measured by a standard flexible surgical ruler.

Anatomic measurements

The following anatomic measurements were applied: (1) the course of SLA via transoral approach; (2) relationship with the superior horn of thyroid cartilage (SHTC), inferior margin of hyoid bone (IMHB), superior margin of thyroid cartilage (SMTC), and internal superior laryngeal nerve (ISLN); (3) branches of SLA; (4) variations of SLA origin.

RESULTS

The course of SLA

Since it branched from the superior thyroid artery, the SLA had a slightly descending course toward the SHTC and was separated by tiny branches feeding the constrictors on the way, after which it penetrated the thyrohyoid membrane. When reaching into the intra‐larynx, it was directed anteriorly along the superior border of the thyroid cartilage in the para‐glottic space until arriving at the pharyngo‐epiglottic fold, after which SLA separated into a major branch named as pharyngo‐epiglottic artery (PEA), adopting a slightly ascending course to feeding the epiglottis (Figure 1). The trunk of SLA had a posterior‐inferior direction, after which it branched into two main terminal branches, the anterior‐inferior branch and the posterior‐inferior branch. The terminal branches were mutually anastomosed and also anastomosed with the branches from the inferior laryngeal artery and cricothyroid artery.
FIGURE 1

SLA and ISLN anatomy via transoral approach. AEF, aryepiglottic fold; HB, hyoid bone; ISLN, superior laryngeal nerve; PS, pyriform sinus; SLA, superior laryngeal artery; TC, thyroid cartilage

SLA and ISLN anatomy via transoral approach. AEF, aryepiglottic fold; HB, hyoid bone; ISLN, superior laryngeal nerve; PS, pyriform sinus; SLA, superior laryngeal artery; TC, thyroid cartilage

Relationship with the landmarks

The landmarks included the SHTC, IMHB, and SMTC (Figure 2). The distance from SLA to SHTC was (9.11 ± 0.58)mm on the left and (9.01 ± 0.37)mm on the right; the distance from SLA to IMHB was (2.00 ± 0.11)mm on the left and (1.95 ± 0.08)mm on the right; the distance from SLA to ISLN was (5.98 ± 0.48)mm on the left and (5.78 ± 0.36)mm on the right. No significant difference was found between bilateral sides (p > 0.05). In addition, the distance from SLA to SMTC was (5.52 ± 0.24)mm on the left and (5.80 ± 0.15)mm on the right; the difference between bilateral sides was also observed (p = 0.03) (Table 1).
FIGURE 2

Diagram for the measurements of the superior laryngeal artery with the landmarks. EC, extension cord; HB, hyoid bone; ISLN, superior laryngeal nerve; SLA, superior laryngeal artery; TC, thyroid cartilage

TABLE 1

Distance measurements between SLA with landmarks

LandmarksLeftRightMaxMin p
SHTC9.11 ± 0.589.01 ± 0.3710.28.440.74
IMHB2.00 ± 0.111.95 ± 0.082.121.830.45
SMTC5.52 ± 0.245.80 ± 0.156.015.230.03*
ISLN5.97 ± 0.485.77 ± 0.366.825.130.43

Note: M ± Std, Max, Min unit: mm. Statistically significant differences between both sides: *p < 0.05.

Abbreviations: IMHB, inferior margin of hyoid bone; ISLN, superior laryngeal nerve; SHTC, superior horn of thyroid cartilage; SLA, superior laryngeal artery; SMHT, superior margin of thyroid cartilage.

Diagram for the measurements of the superior laryngeal artery with the landmarks. EC, extension cord; HB, hyoid bone; ISLN, superior laryngeal nerve; SLA, superior laryngeal artery; TC, thyroid cartilage Distance measurements between SLA with landmarks Note: M ± Std, Max, Min unit: mm. Statistically significant differences between both sides: *p < 0.05. Abbreviations: IMHB, inferior margin of hyoid bone; ISLN, superior laryngeal nerve; SHTC, superior horn of thyroid cartilage; SLA, superior laryngeal artery; SMHT, superior margin of thyroid cartilage.

Branches of the SLA

The major branch, described by Rusu et al. as an anterior branch and we named as pharyngo‐epiglottic artery, penetrated the epiglottis at the lateral margin to supply the epiglottis (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3

PEA pierced into the epiglottis at the lateral margin. E, epiglottis; LA, lingual artery, LA‐B, branch of lingual artery; PEA, pharyngo‐epiglottic artery; PS, pyriform sinus; TB, tongue base; TC, thyroid cartilage

PEA pierced into the epiglottis at the lateral margin. E, epiglottis; LA, lingual artery, LA‐B, branch of lingual artery; PEA, pharyngo‐epiglottic artery; PS, pyriform sinus; TB, tongue base; TC, thyroid cartilage

Variations of SLA origin

The origin of SLA was not only the superior thyroid artery (STA) but also the lingual artery (LA) and external carotid artery (ECA) (Figure 4). There were two specimens that originated from the LA, both on the right sides, and one specimen that originated from LA on the right and ECA on the left. Though anatomical variations of SLA origin, the location in which SLA passed through the thyrohyoid membrane were relatively stable.
FIGURE 4

Variations of SLA. ECA, external carotid artery; HB, hyoid bone; LA, lingual artery; PEA, pharyngo‐epiglottic artery; SLA, superior laryngeal artery

Variations of SLA. ECA, external carotid artery; HB, hyoid bone; LA, lingual artery; PEA, pharyngo‐epiglottic artery; SLA, superior laryngeal artery

DISCUSSION

In this study, we explored the anatomy of the SLA via a transoral endoscopic approach. The SLA can originate from different places. Our data suggested that SLA originates from the superior thyroid artery but also the lingual artery and external carotid artery. Moreover, the location where SLA passes through the thyrohyoid membrane and the course of intra‐laryngeal segment were relatively stable. The total laryngectomy in transoral robotic approach was first successfully performed at the Montefiore Medical Center in July of 2007. Since then, it has been widely accepted in clinical work. Previous studies have suggested that hemostatic clip application to the bilateral superior laryngeal vascular pedicles is necessary for successful transoral surgery. , , , Our study showed that the SHTC, SMTC, and IMHB could be regarded as anatomical landmarks to locate SLA, thus providing a reference for the efficient hemostasis in transorally laryngeal or pharyngeal surgery. During the transoral surgery, we suggested that the assistant can move the laryngeal prominence; meanwhile, the operator can observe the movement of the thyroid cartilage through the suspension laryngoscope and then locate the SHTC. In this study, the distance from SLA to SMTC between bilateral sides was different (p = 0.03), suggesting that the SLA was located further to SMTC on the right side. However, further studies with a larger sample size should be performed to confirm these findings. ISLN was paralleled with SLA, and the closest distance between the SLA and ISLN was observed around the SHTC. Consequently, there is a possibility to damage the ISLN during surgery when dealing with the SLA around the SHTC. In our study, we also found that the SLA was away from the ISLN when going through the pharyngo‐epiglottic fold, and the distance between the SLA and ISLN was wider when approaching the epiglottis. Thus, pharyngo‐epiglottic fold may be another landmark when dealing with SLA, especially when treating laryngeal carcinoma of the supra‐glottic type. PEA is the major branch from SLA that supplies the tissue of epiglottis. For cases of epiglottic carcinoma, accurate homeostasis of PEA at the lateral margin of epiglottis may promote the smooth surgery procedure, shorten the operative time, and preserve the blood supply for the glottis. Previous studies have reported on the aberrant superior laryngeal artery (ASLA). , , Rusu et al. discovered a branch of STA traversing the foramen thyroideum to supply the larynx, with an emerged frequency of 5%. In our study, no ASLA was observed, but it is still necessary to pay attention to the ASLA, as it may result in an alarming postoperative hemorrhage. This study has a few limitations: (1) there are only seven cadaveric heads, and samples are too small, thus resulting in the bias of the statistics; (2) all cadavers in this study were adult males from China; (3) the cadaveric heads were transected at the seventh cervical vertebra‐first thoracic vertebra level, so the tension of the cervical vascular and muscle was lost, thus limiting the precision of measurements.

CONCLUSION

This study provided a comprehensive and detailed description of the endoscopic clinical anatomy of SLA. The SHTC, SMTC, and IMHB could be regarded as anatomical landmarks for locating the SLA via the transoral approach.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
  17 in total

1.  Transoral robotic surgery total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Georges Lawson; Abie H Mendelsohn; Sebastien Van Der Vorst; Vincent Bachy; Marc Remacle
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Anatomical variations of the superior thyroid and superior laryngeal arteries.

Authors:  Teresa Vázquez; Rosana Cobiella; Eva Maranillo; Francisco Jose Valderrama; Stephen McHanwell; Ian Parkin; Jose Ramon Sañudo
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  The arterial anatomy of larynx transplantation: microsurgical revascularization of the larynx.

Authors:  J P Anthony; P Argenta; P P Trabulsy; R Y Lin; S J Mathes
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  Transoral en bloc resection of superficial laryngeal and pharyngeal cancers.

Authors:  Kenji Okami; Koji Ebisumoto; Akihiro Sakai; Ryousuke Sugimoto; Daisuke Maki; Kosuke Saito; Shoji Kaneda; Masahiro Iida; Go Ogura; Naoya Nakamura; Koichiro Nishiyama
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Surgeon experience and complications with Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS).

Authors:  Stanley H Chia; Neil D Gross; Jeremy D Richmon
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Bleeding Complications After Transoral Robotic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  William Stokes; Jad Ramadan; Georges Lawson; F Robert L Ferris; Floyd Christopher Holsinger; Meghan T Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Hemorrhage after transoral robotic-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Scott A Asher; Hilliary N White; Alexandra E Kejner; Eben L Rosenthal; William R Carroll; J Scott Magnuson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Radiofrequency coblation for the resection of head and neck malignancies.

Authors:  A Simon Carney; Michael S Timms; Connor N Marnane; Suren Krishnan; Guy Rees; Showkat Mirza
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Complications in transoral CO2 laser surgery for carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx.

Authors:  Isabel Vilaseca-González; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; José-Luis Blanch-Alejandro; Miguel Moragas-Lluis
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Transoral laser microsurgery for T1a glottic cancer: review of 404 cases.

Authors:  Martin Canis; Friedrich Ihler; Alexios Martin; Christoph Matthias; Wolfgang Steiner
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.