| Literature DB >> 35733970 |
Yin Wang1, Hongze Xia1, Qien Yang2, Deyu Yang1, Shujie Liu1, Zhanhong Cui1.
Abstract
For young ruminants, starter feeding can effectively facilitate the growth and development of rumen in ruminants, but the development of rumen is an important physiological challenge as it remains unclear for the mechanism of starter feeding stimulating. In this study, we performed an analysis of ruminal microbiota and their metabolites in yak calves to explore how the ruminal microbiota and their metabolites stimulate the ruminal function. This study associated 16S rRNA sequencing with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics to evaluate the effects of starter feeding on ruminal microbiota diversity and metabolites in yak calves. We designed the experiment using 20 yak calves that were assigned equally into 2 groups, based on feeding milk replacer; the control (RA) group was fed with alfalfa hay while the treatment (RAS) group was fed with alfalfa hay and starter. After the experiment, we investigated the ruminal microbiota and metabolites through 16S rRNA sequencing and LC-MS-based metabolomics. During the preweaning period, the RAS group significantly promoted the growth performance and ruminal development in yak calves, including increases in body weight, chest girth, and development of rumen (P < 0.05). The RAS group increased the relative abundance of Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Synergistota, and Spirochaetota and decreased the abundance of Firmicutes, Desulfobacterota, Actinobacteriota, and Actinobacteriota at the phylum level (P < 0.05). At the genus level, the ruminal content of the RAS group was significantly enriched for Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and Ruminococcus, while depleted for Prevotella, Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, and NK4A214_group (P < 0.05). A total of 37 metabolites were identified between the RA group and the RAS group, of which 15 metabolites were upregulated and 22 metabolites were downregulated compared with the RA group. Metabolic pathway analyses indicated that upregulated the metabolites of the RAS group yak calves were related to carbohydrate metabolism, ubiquinone, and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis, while the downregulated metabolic pathway was relevant to xenobiotic biodegradation, metabolism, and nucleotide metabolism. In summary, starter feeding before weaning significantly increased the dry matter intake and body weight of yak calves, changed the diversity and abundance of ruminal microbiota, and positively regulated the good development of ruminal morphology and function, providing an important basis for high-quality cultivation and the nutritional level of nutrition of yak calves in the Qinghai Tibet plateau. This study is based on the availability of 16S rRNA sequencing and LC-MS-based metabolomics in clarifying the function of starter feeding in the yak calves.Entities:
Keywords: feeding strategies; ruminal development; ruminal metabolomics; ruminal microbiota; yak calves
Year: 2022 PMID: 35733970 PMCID: PMC9207444 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.821613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Nutrient composition of the milk replacer, alfalfa hay, starter used in the present study.
| Items (% of dry matter) | Milk replacer | Alfalfa hay | Starter feed |
| Dry matter (% as fed) | 95.00 | 93.70 | 87.80 |
| Sugar | − | − | 6.50 |
| Starch | − | − | 40.50 |
| Crude protein | 26.24 | 12.51 | 20.01 |
| Ether extract | 27.79 | 0.89 | 4.70 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | − | 56.45 | 10.90 |
| Acid detergent fiber | − | 40.40 | 4.10 |
| Calcium | 2.50 | 0.99 | 0.79 |
| Phosphorus | 1.40 | 0.16 | 0.46 |
| Lysine | 2.20 | 0.84 | 1.05 |
| Methionine | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.34 |
Effects of the starter feeding supplementation in the preweaning period on the growth performance and development of rumen in yak calves.
| Treatment | SEM | ||||
| Items | RA | RAS | |||
| Growth performance | Body weight (kg) | 72.07 ± 2.47 | 80.58 ± 1.26 | 1.38 | < 0.001 |
| Body length (cm) | 90.80 ± 3.63 | 93.80 ± 1.92 | 1.34 | 0.141 | |
| Body height (cm) | 76.33 ± 2.08 | 81.25 ± 0.96 | 1.20 | 0.008 | |
| Chest girth (cm) | 104.80 ± 2.68 | 116.40 ± 2.61 | 2.22 | < 0.001 | |
| DMI (g) | 608.36 ± 60.68 | 678.71 ± 6.53 | 17.04 | 0.033 | |
| Rumen weight | Rumen (g) | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 1.17 ± 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.036 |
| Rumen index, expressed as kg of organ/kg of BW | Rumen (×10–2) | 1.47 ± 0.08 | 1.56 ± 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.221 |
Effects of starter feeding on the ruminal fermentation parameters and ruminal epithelium development in yak calves.
| Treatment | SEM | ||||
| Items | RA | RAS | |||
| Ruminal epithelium | Papilla width (μm) | 952.69 ± 105.45 | 824.07 ± 191.11 | 25.15 | 0.283 |
| Papilla length (μm) | 569.82 ± 100.37 | 748.72 ± 128.53 | 33.29 | 0.049 | |
| Muscle thickness (μm) | 1915.07 ± 439.49 | 2031.12 ± 643.69 | 105.68 | 0.757 | |
| Ruminal fermentation characteristics | pH | 7.35 ± 0.12 | 7.35 ± 0.116 | 0.03 | 0.978 |
| Ammonia nitrogen, NH3-N (mg/dL) | 2.46 ± 0.28 | 3.29 ± 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.001 | |
| Total VFA (mmol/L) | 57.40 ± 5.27 | 50.23 ± 5.25 | 2.07 | 0.081 | |
| Acetate (mmol/L) | 35.78 ± 3.51 | 29.60 ± 1.05 | 0.23 | 0.034 | |
| Propionate (mmol/L) | 9.39 ± 1.29 | 8.28 ± 1.07 | 0.44 | 0.232 | |
| Butyrate (mmol/L) | 5.41 ± 1.55 | 4.62 ± 1.18 | 0.43 | 0.389 | |
| Isobutyrate (mmol/L) | 1.53 ± 0.084 | 1.54 ± 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.936 | |
| Valerate (mmol/L) | 3.58 ± 0.43 | 4.23 ± 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.021 | |
| Isovalerate (mmol/L) | 1.20 ± 0.14 | 1.27 ± 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.592 | |
Effects of the starter feeding on richness and diversity index of ruminal microbiota in yak calves.
| Items | Treatment | SEM | ||
| RA | RAS | |||
| OTUs | 1457.25 ± 94.49 | 1265.00 ± 120.69 | 50.78 | 0.046 |
| Good’s coverage | 0.99 ± 0.001 | 0.99 ± 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.557 |
| ACE value | 1619.81 ± 162.03 | 1404.46 ± 132.99 | 63.33 | 0.086 |
| Chao 1 value | 1596.47 ± 143.09 | 1385.30 ± 136.44 | 60.72 | 0.077 |
| Shannon indices | 7.50 ± 0.29 | 7.18 ± 0.89 | 0.21 | 0.468 |
| Simpson indices | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.468 |
FIGURE 1(A) Diversity analyses based on the ruminal microbiota; phylum (B) and genus level (C) composition of the ruminal bacteria (top 15).
Ruminal microbiota community difference between the two groups by using the Mann–Whitney U test.
| Items | Groups | SEM | ||
| RA | RAS | |||
|
| ||||
|
| 38.38 ± 4.96 | 53.61 ± 1.41 | 2.963 | 0.001 |
|
| 43.98 ± 2.77 | 30.70 ± 2.41 | 2.567 | < 0.001 |
|
| 3.16 ± 1.16 | 2.20 ± 0.92 | 0.387 | 0.240 |
|
| 2.68 ± 0.38 | 3.87 ± 0.59 | 0.263 | 0.011 |
|
| 0.38 ± 0.13 | 0.43 ± 0.15 | 0.046 | 0.577 |
|
| 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.07 | 0.040 | 0.004 |
|
| 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.90 ± 0.27 | 0.140 | 0.005 |
|
| 0.68 ± 0.11 | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 0.069 | 0.002 |
|
| 1.06 ± 0.28 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.169 | 0.002 |
|
| 0.46 ± 0.19 | 1.00 ± 0.22 | 0.130 | 0.017 |
|
| ||||
|
| 11.04 ± 0.10 | 8.10 ± 1.43 | 0.707 | 0.018 |
|
| 2.67 ± 0.74 | 1.20 ± 0.85 | 0.290 | 0.274 |
|
| 0.56 ± 0.08 | 0.56 ± 0.35 | 0.080 | 0.993 |
|
| 6.73 ± 1.74 | 12.33 ± 0.79 | 1.240 | 0.004 |
|
| 1.56 ± 0.31 | 1.39 ± 0.54 | 0.164 | 0.659 |
|
| 3.66 ± 0.92 | 4.57 ± 0.50 | 0.337 | 0.203 |
|
| 2.72 ± 0.71 | 1.43 ± 0.25 | 0.311 | 0.018 |
|
| 6.60 ± 1.11 | 4.07 ± 1.40 | 0.565 | 0.013 |
|
| 1.37 ± 0.46 | 1.08 ± 0.11 | 0.139 | 0.351 |
|
| 1.59 ± 0.41 | 3.93 ± 0.23 | 0.660 | 0.041 |
FIGURE 2(A) QC samples correlation analysis; (B) The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway annotation; (C) The volcano plot of difference metabolites; (D) enrichment of differential metabolites in KEGG pathways. Rich factor, ratio of the proportion of differential metabolites to the proportion of all metabolites in the pathway; the size of the dots in the graph represents the number of distinct metabolites enriched in the corresponding pathways.
Differential metabolites in the rumen of yak calves in the RA and RAS groups.
| Metabolites | mzmed | rtmed | log2FC | VIP | Regulated | |
| Saccharin | 181.992 | 6.042 | 7.160 | 0.000 | 3.387 | Up |
| 6-Keto-prostaglandin f1alpha | 369.228 | 12.182 | 2.556 | 0.009 | 2.381 | Up |
| delta-Tocopherol | 401.343 | 16.697 | 4.883 | 0.012 | 2.348 | Up |
| Pyridoxine | 330.120 | 2.068 | 4.228 | 0.014 | 2.896 | Up |
| 2′- | 257.079 | 5.528 | 1.411 | 0.015 | 2.638 | Up |
| 15(S)-HpETE | 353.234 | 12.929 | 1.405 | 0.016 | 2.137 | Up |
| FAHFA (16:1/18:3) | 529.424 | 14.506 | 0.964 | 0.017 | 1.374 | Up |
| Isopentenyladenine | 202.110 | 10.799 | 2.845 | 0.025 | 2.731 | Up |
| 419.212 | 9.289 | 2.629 | 0.031 | 1.717 | Up | |
| 298.115 | 1.361 | 0.638 | 0.033 | 1.566 | Up | |
| Pepstatin | 684.455 | 15.539 | 0.884 | 0.033 | 2.031 | Up |
| (+/-)8(9)-DiHET | 337.239 | 13.317 | 1.122 | 0.038 | 2.039 | Up |
| Xylitol | 151.061 | 1.426 | 0.862 | 0.041 | 1.692 | Up |
| (+/-)9,10-dihydroxy-12Z-octadecenoic acid | 313.239 | 12.924 | 0.962 | 0.041 | 2.172 | Up |
| Cinnamoylglycine | 204.067 | 8.755 | 0.639 | 0.046 | 1.025 | Up |
| 3,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | 153.020 | 7.550 | –4.292 | 0.001 | 2.951 | Down |
| (3R)-8-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3,4-dihydro-1H-2-benzopyran-1-one | 269.083 | 9.621 | –3.107 | 0.002 | 3.140 | Down |
| 2-Hydroxyhippuric acid | 194.046 | 7.134 | –2.277 | 0.004 | 2.801 | Down |
| FAHFA (2:0/23:0) | 411.349 | 16.143 | –3.557 | 0.005 | 2.496 | Down |
| Hydroquinone | 109.030 | 7.551 | –3.315 | 0.006 | 2.674 | Down |
| D-Glucosyl-beta-1,1- | 698.560 | 16.209 | –1.790 | 0.007 | 2.303 | Down |
| 3-(methylsulfanyl)-5H-[1,2,4]triazino[5,6-b]indole | 215.039 | 10.572 | –1.497 | 0.010 | 2.102 | Down |
| PC (15:1/18:2) | 800.546 | 16.225 | –1.955 | 0.011 | 1.749 | Down |
| Isorhapontigenin | 257.082 | 10.283 | –3.028 | 0.016 | 2.153 | Down |
| FAHFA (2:0/18:1) | 357.265 | 13.102 | –0.751 | 0.017 | 1.655 | Down |
| 1-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propan-1-one | 301.108 | 7.583 | –2.793 | 0.018 | 1.856 | Down |
| 2-Furoylglycine | 168.031 | 5.992 | –2.379 | 0.019 | 2.147 | Down |
| PE (16:0/16:0) | 690.509 | 14.288 | –1.134 | 0.019 | 1.724 | Down |
| D-Glucuronic acid | 193.036 | 12.638 | –1.792 | 0.024 | 2.331 | Down |
| PG (20:0/20:4) | 825.567 | 15.518 | –3.036 | 0.032 | 2.263 | Down |
| PG (20:0/20:3) | 827.584 | 16.042 | –2.299 | 0.032 | 1.490 | Down |
| 13,14-dihydro Prostaglandin F1α | 393.243 | 14.550 | –1.955 | 0.033 | 2.025 | Down |
| PG (18:1/22:4) | 823.552 | 15.392 | –1.183 | 0.033 | 1.623 | Down |
| 3-methyl-4-[2-(2-methylphenyl)hydrazono]-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-5-one | 215.093 | 1.915 | –0.860 | 0.038 | 1.362 | Down |
| UMP | 323.029 | 1.460 | –1.210 | 0.039 | 2.018 | Down |
| 269.046 | 10.375 | –2.514 | 0.046 | 1.759 | Down | |
| Catechin | 289.072 | 7.111 | –1.567 | 0.049 | 2.133 | Down |
FC, fold change; mzmed, mass-to-charge ratio of metabolites; rtmed, retention time of metabolites; VIP, variable importance in the projection.
Regulated “up” represents a higher abundance in calves in the RAS group, “down” represent a higher abundance in calves in the RA group.
FIGURE 3Heatmap of the correlation between microbiota [(A) phylum and (B) genus] and fermentation parameters in the rumen of yak calves. RBW, finally body weight; DMI, dry matter intake; RW, ruminal weight; RPW, ruminal papilla width; RPL, ruminal papilla length; MT, muscle thickness; NH3N, NH3-N; MCP, microbiota crude protein; Ace, acetate; Pro, propionate; But, butyrate; Ibu, isobutyrate; Val, valerate; Iva, isovalerate.
FIGURE 4Heatmap of the correlation between ruminal microbiota [(A) phylum and (B) genus] and metabolites of yak calves.