| Literature DB >> 35733704 |
Anna Woodbury1,2, Lisa C Krishnamurthy1,2,3, Anastasia Bohsali3, Venkatagiri Krishnamurthy1,2, Jeremy L Smith1, Melat Gebre1, Kari Tyler1,2, Mark Vernon2, Bruce Crosson1,2, Jerry P Kalangara1,2, Vitaly Napadow4, Jason W Allen1, Daniel Harper1.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate changes in cortical thickness and right posterior insula (r-pIns) gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations in veterans with fibromyalgia treated with auricular percutaneous electric nerve field stimulation (PENFS). Materials & methods: This was a randomized, controlled, open label investigation conducted in a government hospital. Twenty-one veterans with fibromyalgia were randomized to receive either standard therapy (ST; i.e., 4 weekly visits with a pain practitioner) or ST with auricular PENFS (ST + PENFS). Neuroimaging data was collected at baseline (i.e. before the first treatment session) and again within 2 weeks post-treatment. Clinical pain and physical function were also assessed at these timepoints. Single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy was carried out in r-pIns to assess changes in r-pIns GABA concentrations and high-resolution T1-weighted images were collected to assess changes in regional gray matter volume using cortical thickness.Entities:
Keywords: Fibromyalgia; Nerve Stimulation; Neuroimaging; Pain; Percutaneous Electric; Veterans
Year: 2022 PMID: 35733704 PMCID: PMC9207563 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2022.100093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurobiol Pain ISSN: 2452-073X
Fig. 1Consort Diagram for Cortical Thickness & GABA Analysis.
Changes in Cortical Thickness Following Treatment. Regions of interest (ROI) were analyzed for cortical thickness changes from pre- to post- treatment. Left- and right-hemisphere areas were both analyzed using paired t-test and FDR correction for multiple comparisons. Averaged data for left hemisphere cortical thickness significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in the middle posterior cingulate increased in the cuneus following ST + PENFS. These findings were significant following FDR correction for multiple comparisons. Significant findings in the control group did not survive multiple comparisons corrections. Uncorrected p-values are presented in the table; FDR corrected p-values are in parentheses.
| Post vs. Pre Cortical Thickness Comparison | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Therapy (Control) | Region of Interest (Hemisphere) | T-stat | p-value uncorrected (corrected) | |
| Middle frontal gyrus | Left: | 2.086 | 0.041* | |
| Right: | 1.835 | 0.058 | ||
| Parahippocampal gyrus | Left: | 2.247 | 0.033* | |
| Right: | 1.735 | 0.067 | ||
| Precuneus | Left: | 4.014 | 0.003* | |
| Right: | −0.537 | 0.305 | ||
| Hippocampus | Left: | 0.791 | 0.229 | |
| Right: | 2.19 | 0.036* | ||
| Standard Therapy + PENFS (Intervention) | Region of Interest (Hemisphere) | T-stat | p-value | |
| Posterior cingulate | Left: | −2.592 | 0.018*(0.022) ¥ | |
| Right: | 0.531 | 0.306 | ||
| Cuneus | Left: | 2.786 | 0.014*(0.033) ¥ | |
| Right: | −1.139 | 0.146 | ||
| Central insula | Left: | −2.134 | 0.035* | |
| Right: | −1.668 | 0.07 | ||
| Angular gyrus | Left: | −1.051 | 0.164 | |
| Right: | −3.844 | 0.003* | ||
| Precuneus | Left: | −0.577 | 0.291 | |
| Right: | −1.881 | 0.051* | ||
* uncorrected, significant; ¥significant after FDR correction for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 2Changes in cortical thickness associated with standard therapy (ST) and ST + PENFS. The cortices for the regions of interest (ROI) with significant correlations are depicted both in 3 dimensions and with a 2-dimensional sagittal slice extracted from FreeSurfer. (+) denotes an increase in cortical thickness for the ROI following treatment. (-) denotes a decrease in cortical thickness following treatment. A. Cortical thickness for left middle frontal gyrus, precuneus and parahippocampal gyrus increased with standard therapy compared to baseline. These findings did not survive FDR correction for multiple comparisons. B. Cortical thickness in the left hemisphere significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in the middle posterior cingulate and increased in the cuneus following ST + PENFS compared to baseline. These findings were significant following FDR correction for multiple comparisons. Left central insula and right angular gyrus cortical thickness significantly (p < 0.05) decreased as well, though these findings were not significant following FDR correction for multiple comparisons.
Correlations Between Changes in Cortical Thickness and Pain Scores. Standard therapy group right hemisphere insula size significantly (p < 0.05) inversely correlated with pain scores; as insular size increased, pain scores decreased. ST + PENFS group right hemisphere posterior dorsal cingulate size significantly (p < 0.05) positively correlated with pain scores; as posterior dorsal cingulate size decreased, pain scores decreased.
| Post vs Pre Cortical Thickness and Pain Scores Regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Therapy (Control) | Region of Interest | T-stat | p-value |
| Right Insula | −3.127 | 0.02 | |
| Standard Therapy + PENFS (Intervention) | Posterior dorsal cingulate | 2.45 | 0.044 |
Fig. 3Changes in cortical thickness of right insula and posterior dorsal cingulate cortex associated with improved pain score. The cortices for the regions of interest (ROI) with significant correlations to pain scores are depicted both in 3 dimensions and with a 2-dimensional sagittal slice extracted from FreeSurfer. (+) denotes an increase in cortical thickness for the ROI following treatment. (-) denotes a decrease in cortical thickness following treatment. A. Standard therapy group right hemisphere insula size significantly (p < 0.05) inversely correlated with pain scores; as insular size increased, pain scores decreased. These findings did not survive FDR correction for multiple comparisons. B. ST + PENFS group right hemisphere posterior dorsal cingulate size significantly (p < 0.05) positively correlated with pain scores; as posterior dorsal cingulate size decreased, pain scores decreased. These findings also did not survive FDR correction for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 4Changes in GABA Related to Changes in Pain on DVPRS. Changes in GABA (IU, CSF corrected) and GABA/Cr ratios are denoted at baseline and 6 weeks. GABA values from all scans are plotted on the scatterplots against pain scores, as measured by the DVPRS.