| Literature DB >> 35732857 |
Alessia Viero1,2,3, Lucie Biehler-Gomez4, Carmelo Messina5,6, Annalisa Cappella6,7, Konstantinos Giannoukos8, Guido Viel1, Franco Tagliaro2,9, Cristina Cattaneo3.
Abstract
Fracture dating is an issue at the forefront of forensic sciences. While dating fracture is crucial to understanding and verifying the chronology of events in cases of abuse and violent death, its application is the subject of considerable discussion in the scientific community, filled with limitations and difficulties. Current methods for fracture dating are mainly based on a qualitative assessment through macroscopy, microscopy, and imaging and subject to variations depending on the experience of the observer. In this paper, we investigated the potential of quantifiable micro-CT analysis for fracture dating. Five histomorphometric parameters commonly used for the study of the 3D bone trabecular microarchitecture with micro-CT were calculated based on nine fractures of known post-traumatic ages, including the degree of anisotropy, connectivity density, bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, and trabecular separation. As a result, trends in the evolution of the microarchitecture of the bone relative to age of the callus could be identified, in particular concerning anisotropy, trabecular separation and connectivity density, consistent with the healing bone process. The findings obtained in this pilot study encourage further research in quantifiable parameters of the bone microarchitecture as they could represent useful features for the construction of objective models for fracture dating.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35732857 PMCID: PMC9218115 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14530-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Measurements of the histomorphometric parameters commonly used for the study of the 3D bone trabecular microarchitecture with micro-CT on nine fractures of known PTST.
| PTST | Degree of | Connectivity | BV/TV | Mean TbTh | Mean TbSp | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HB | Callus | HB | Callus | HB | Callus | HB | Callus | HB | Callus | ||
| N1 | 8 days | 0.77 | 0.79 | 191.69 | 120.69 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 6.74 | 6.36 | 48.09 | 55.87 |
| N5 | 28 days | 0.85 | 0.43 | 83.50 | 1488.38 | 0.12 | 0.42 | 8.03 | 7.41 | 51.63 | 12.64 |
| N4 | 42 days | 0.79 | 0.32 | 513.06 | 2519.81 | 0.12 | 0.34 | 7.19 | 7.22 | 40.77 | 17.13 |
| N3 | 72 days | 0.74 | 0.30 | 109.38 | 1011.88 | 0.15 | 0.38 | 8.74 | 10.02 | 43.15 | 21.55 |
| N2A | 86 days | 0.80 | 0.39 | 39.31 | 1547.62 | 0.15 | 0.37 | 6.99 | 8.45 | 41.22 | 16.72 |
| N2B | 86 days | 0.83 | 0.54 | 68.81 | 865.44 | 0.16 | 0.50 | 7.25 | 10.96 | 39.24 | 13.60 |
| N2C | 86 days | 0.80 | 0.47 | 41.56 | 1366.12 | 0.14 | 0.47 | 8.37 | 9.52 | 43.99 | 15.63 |
| N2D | 86 days | 0.81 | 0.42 | 26.69 | 1282.31 | 0.15 | 0.41 | 7.00 | 8.65 | 46.28 | 14.00 |
| N6 | 2 years | 0.80 | 0.73 | 109.63 | 169.94 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 6.36 | 11.08 | 29.83 | 29.42 |
PTST post-traumatic survival time, HB healthy bone, BV/TV bone volume fraction, TbTh trabecular thickness, TbSp trabecular separation; REVs 1 and 4 of healthy bone and REVs 2 and 3 of callus area were combined.
Figure 1Selected areas of interest in the nine bone samples; (a): sample N1, 8 days old, areas of interest 1 and 3 with no signs of bone healing and sharp fracture margins next to the bony trabeculae, areas 2 and 4: healthy bone; (b): sample N5, 28 days old, areas of interest 2 and 3 with woven non-remodeled bone close to fracture line, areas 1 and 4: healthy bone; (c): sample N4, 42 days old, areas of interest 2 and 3 with exaggerated bulging callus accumulating at the periphery, areas 1 and 4: healthy bone; (d): sample N3, 72 days old, areas of interest 2 and 3 with exuberant woven bone formation, areas 1 and 4: healthy bone; (e): sample N2A, 86 days old, areas of interest 2 and 3 with denser woven bone, areas 1 and 4: healthy bone; (f): sample N2B, 86 days old, areas of interest 2 and 3 with signs of advanced healing, including lamellar oriented trabeculae and a smoother appearance of the cortical regions, areas 1 and 4: healthy bone; (g): sample N2C, 86 days old, areas of interest 2 and 3 with lamellar and woven bone, areas 1 and 4: healthy bone; (h): sample N2D, 86 days old, areas of interest 2 and 3 with dense woven callus and complete bridging on the left side, areas 1 and 4: healthy bone; (i): sample N6, 2 years old, areas of interest with 2 and 3 remodeled lamellar bone, areas 1 and 4: healthy bone. Dragonfly software, Version 2020.1.1.809 (academic licence) from Object Research Systems (ORS) Inc, Montreal, Canada, 2020 (software
available at http://www.theobjects.com/dragonfly) was used to generate the volume renderings.
Figure 2Degree of anisotropy (a), trabecular separation (b) and trabecular thickness (c), (a): ratio between the medium (D2) and the shorter ellipsoid axis (D1) in order to test the degree of anisotropy in the transverse plane of the rib both in the callus and in areas distant from it ; (b): ratio of the mean value of the trabecular separation (TbSp) and its standard deviation both in the callus and in areas distant from it; (c): time-evolution of trabecular thickness of the callus and the normal bone away from the fracture. Values for N2 were averaged. Graph realized with Microsoft Excel.
Figure 3Normalized trabecular thickness Tb.Th(callus)-Tb.Th(healthy) per sample. Graph realized with Microsoft Excel.
Figure 4Connectivity density (a) and bone volume fraction (b), (a): ratio of the connectivity and total volume both in the callus and in areas distant from it; (b): bone volume fraction in the callus and in areas distant from it. Values for N2 were averaged.
Figure 5Contour meshes (cubic boxes with size 4 mm) of the trabecular microarchitecture of the bone far from the callus (healthy bone—a) and of a callus with a PTST of 86 days (b). Dragonfly software, Version 2020.1.1.809 (academic licence) from Object Research Systems (ORS) Inc, Montreal, Canada, 2020 (software
available at http://www.theobjects.com/dragonfly) was used to generate the volume renderings.
| Histomorphometric parameter | Description in BoneJ[ |
|---|---|
| Degree of anisotropy | A measure of how highly oriented substructures are within a volume |
| Connectivity density | The number of connected structures in a network normalized by the volume of the sample |
| Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) | The volume of mineralized bone per unit volume of the sample |
| Trabecular thickness (TbTh) | A measure of the homogeneity of trabecular thickness |
| Trabecular separation (TbSp) | A measure of the homogeneity of trabecular separation |