Literature DB >> 35732674

Participatory mapping identifies risk areas and environmental predictors of endemic anthrax in rural Africa.

Roman Biek1, Tiziana Lembo1, Olubunmi R Aminu2,3, Taya L Forde1, Divine Ekwem1,4, Paul Johnson1, Luca Nelli1, Blandina T Mmbaga5,6, Deogratius Mshanga7, Mike Shand8, Gabriel Shirima4, Markus Walsh9, Ruth N Zadoks10.   

Abstract

Disease mapping reveals geographical variability in incidence, which can help to prioritise control efforts. However, in areas where this is most needed, resources to generate the required data are often lacking. Participatory mapping, which makes use of indigenous knowledge, is a potential approach to identify risk areas for endemic diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Here we combine this method with Geographical Information System-based analyses of environmental variables as a novel approach to study endemic anthrax, caused by the spore-forming bacterium Bacillus anthracis, in rural Africa. Our aims were to: (1) identify high-risk anthrax areas using community knowledge; (2) enhance our understanding of the environmental characteristics associated with these areas; and (3) make spatial predictions of anthrax risk. Community members from the Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA), northern Tanzania, where anthrax is highly prevalent in both animals and humans, were asked to draw areas they perceived to pose anthrax risks to their livestock on geo-referenced maps. After digitisation, random points were generated within and outside the defined areas to represent high- and low-risk areas, respectively. Regression analyses were used to identify environmental variables that may predict anthrax risk. Results were combined to predict how the probability of being a high-risk area for anthrax varies across space. Participatory mapping identified fourteen discrete high-risk areas ranging from 0.2 to 212.9 km2 in size and occupying 8.4% of the NCA. Areas that pose a high risk of anthrax were positively associated with factors that increase contact with Bacillus anthracis spores rather than those associated with the pathogen's survival: close proximity to inland water bodies, where wildlife and livestock congregate, and low organic carbon content, which may indicate an increased likelihood of animals grazing close to soil surface and ingesting spores. Predicted high-risk areas were located in the centre of the NCA, which is likely to be encountered by most herds during movements in search for resources. We demonstrate that participatory mapping combined with spatial analyses can provide novel insights into the geography of disease risk. This approach can be used to prioritise areas for control in low-resource settings, especially for diseases with environmental transmission.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35732674      PMCID: PMC9217952          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14081-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  34 in total

1.  Achieving explanatory depth and spatial breadth in infectious disease modelling: Integrating active and passive case surveillance.

Authors:  Luca Nelli; Heather M Ferguson; Jason Matthiopoulos
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Ecology of anthrax.

Authors:  G B Van Ness
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The global distribution of Bacillus anthracis and associated anthrax risk to humans, livestock and wildlife.

Authors:  Colin J Carlson; Ian T Kracalik; Noam Ross; Kathleen A Alexander; Martin E Hugh-Jones; Mark Fegan; Brett T Elkin; Tasha Epp; Todd K Shury; Wenyi Zhang; Mehriban Bagirova; Wayne M Getz; Jason K Blackburn
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 17.745

4.  Bacillus anthracis diversity in Kruger National Park.

Authors:  K L Smith; V DeVos; H Bryden; L B Price; M E Hugh-Jones; P Keim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus subtilis spore surface properties and transport.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Adam Driks; Kamal Tawfiq; Michael Mallozzi; Sandip Patil
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 5.268

6.  Modeling the geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax disease, for the contiguous United States using predictive ecological [corrected] niche modeling.

Authors:  Jason K Blackburn; Kristina M McNyset; Andrew Curtis; Martin E Hugh-Jones
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Predictability of anthrax infection in the Serengeti, Tanzania.

Authors:  Katie Hampson; Tiziana Lembo; Paul Bessell; Harriet Auty; Craig Packer; Jo Halliday; Cari A Beesley; Robert Fyumagwa; Richard Hoare; Eblate Ernest; Christine Mentzel; Kristine L Metzger; Titus Mlengeya; Karen Stamey; Keith Roberts; Patricia P Wilkins; Sarah Cleaveland
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 6.528

8.  Serologic surveillance of anthrax in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania, 1996-2009.

Authors:  Tiziana Lembo; Katie Hampson; Harriet Auty; Cari A Beesley; Paul Bessell; Craig Packer; Jo Halliday; Robert Fyumagwa; Richard Hoare; Eblate Ernest; Christine Mentzel; Titus Mlengeya; Karen Stamey; Patricia P Wilkins; Sarah Cleaveland
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 9.  Factors Contributing to Anthrax Outbreaks in the Circumpolar North.

Authors:  Karsten Hueffer; Devin Drown; Vladimir Romanovsky; Thomas Hennessy
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.464

10.  A multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing malaria risk in northern South America.

Authors:  Temitope O Alimi; Douglas O Fuller; Socrates V Herrera; Myriam Arevalo-Herrera; Martha L Quinones; Justin B Stoler; John C Beier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.