Literature DB >> 16989895

Overview of experimental studies of biological effects of medical ultrasound caused by gas body activation and inertial cavitation.

Douglas L Miller1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound exposure can induce bioeffects in mammalian tissue by the nonthermal mechanism of gas body activation. Pre-existing bodies of gas may be activated even at low-pressure amplitudes. At higher-pressure amplitudes, violent cavitation activity with inertial collapse of microbubbles can be generated from latent nucleation sites or from the destabilization of gas bodies. Mechanical perturbation at the activation sites leads to biological effects on nearby cells and structures. Shockwave lithotripsy was the first medical ultrasound application for which significant cavitational bioeffects were demonstrated in mammalian tissues, including hemorrhage and injury in the kidney. Lithotripter shockwaves can also cause hemorrhage in lung and intestine by activation of pre-existing gas bodies in these tissues. Modern diagnostic ultrasound equipment develops pressure amplitudes sufficient for inertial cavitation, but the living body normally lacks suitable cavitation nuclei. Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are suspensions of microscopic gas bodies created to enhance the echogenicity of blood. Ultrasound contrast agent gas bodies also provide nuclei for inertial cavitation. Bioeffects from contrast-aided diagnostic ultrasound depend on pressure amplitude, UCA dose, dosage delivery method and image timing parameters. Microvascular leakage, capillary rupture, cardiomyocyte killing, inflammatory cell infiltration, and premature ventricular contractions have been reported for myocardial contrast echocardiography with clinical ultrasound machines and clinically relevant agent doses in laboratory animals. Similar bioeffects have been reported in intestine, skeletal muscle, fat, lymph nodes and kidney. These microscale bioeffects could be induced unknowingly in diagnostic examinations; however, the medical significance of bioeffects of diagnostic ultrasound with contrast agents is not yet fully understood in relation to the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16989895     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  36 in total

Review 1.  [Very high frequency ultrasound: New therapeutic method in aesthetic medicine and dermatology].

Authors:  I Kruglikov
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 3.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery.

Authors:  Sophie Hernot; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Gail ter Haar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Advances in acoustic monitoring and control of focused ultrasound-mediated increases in blood-brain barrier permeability.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  The effect of ultrasound with acoustic radiation force on rabbit lung tissue: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Noriya Takayama; Yasunao Ishiguro; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Kazuki Akai; Hideki Sasanuma; Yoshikazu Yasuda; Naotaka Nitta; Iwaki Akiyama
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 8.  Ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.

Authors:  Elisa E Konofagou; Yao-Sheng Tung; James Choi; Thomas Deffieux; Babak Baseri; Fotios Vlachos
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.837

9.  Ultrasound for the treatment of acute kidney injury and other inflammatory conditions: a promising path toward noninvasive neuroimmune regulation.

Authors:  Jieru Cai; William T Nash; Mark D Okusa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2020-06-08

10.  Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.