| Literature DB >> 35730696 |
Pauliina Homsy1, Ilkka Kantonen2, Juho Salo1, Anders Albäck2, Erkki Tukiainen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of soft tissue sarcoma with a margin of healthy tissue may necessitate resection and reconstruction of major blood vessels together with soft tissues of the proximal thigh to preserve the limb. The long-term functional outcomes of these reconstructions remain unestablished. The aim of this report was to assess the vascular and functional outcomes of soft tissue sarcoma patients with femoral vessel reconstructions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone oncovascular reconstruction during the treatment of proximal thigh soft tissue sarcoma in 2014-2020 were reviewed for details of the vascular and soft tissue reconstructions, and the oncological and functional outcomes. This included eight patients of a median age 59 (range 19-77) years. All had a reconstruction of at least the superficial femoral artery and vein as well as soft tissue reconstruction with a muscle flap. All vessel reconstructions were done with either autologous vein (six grafts/four patients) or allograft (10 grafts/six patients). A microvascular latissimus dorsi flap, with a skin island, was incorporated to cover the vascular grafts in five patients. A pedicled sartorius or gracilis muscle flap was used to fill the defect in three patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35730696 PMCID: PMC9543357 DOI: 10.1002/micr.30932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microsurgery ISSN: 0738-1085 Impact factor: 2.080
Patient demographics, treatment and follow‐up details of lower limb soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with vascular and soft tissue reconstructions
| ID | Age (years) sex | Tumor | Artery resection | Vein resection | Arterial graft material | Vein graft material | Soft tissue reconstruction | Later revision | Graft complications | Resection margins | Adjuvant treatment | Length of follow‐up (months) | Status at the end of follow‐up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 77 M | Leiomyosarcoma G3 T2N0M0 | EIA ‐ SFA & DFA | EIV ‐ SFV & DFV | Autologous vein | Autologous vein | Pedicled sartorius | Revision and pedicled gracilis due to infection on POD 22 | Intralesional | Preoperative radiotherapy | 73 | Alive with metastases (24 months) | |
| Patient 2 | 58 F | Leiomyosarcoma G3 T1N0M0 | EIA ‐ SFA | EIV – SFV | Allograft | Allograft | Direct closure | Revision due to skin necrosis on POD 21. Prolonged lymphatic leak. LD on POD 64. Tendon transfers for knee extension at 36 months | Marginal | Preoperative radiotherapy | 48 | Alive with metastases (37 months) | |
| Patient 3 | 59 M | Leiomyosarcoma G3 T2N0M1 | SFA | SFV | Autologous vein | Allograft | Pedicled gracilis | Revision for seroma infection on POD 15 | New SFA graft with autologous vein at 19 months | Marginal | Postoperative radiotherapy | 43 | Alive with metastases |
| Patient 4 | 53 F | Leiomyosarcoma G3 recurrence T1N0M0 | SFA | SFV | Allograft | Allograft | LD | Marginal | None | 36 | Death from metastatic disease (13 months). Local recurrence resected at 13 months | ||
| Patient 5 | 29 M | Myoepithelioma GX T3N0M0 | SFA | SFV | Allograft | Allograft | Skin graft | LD on POD 105 due to an infected seroma | PTA and stent to proximal arterial stenosis 7 months, 8 times thereafter | Marginal | Postoperative radiotherapy | 44 | Alive, no evidence of disease |
| Patient 6 | 67 M | Myxoid liposarcoma G2 T2N0M0 | SFA | SFV | Autologous vein | Allograft | Pedicled Sartorius | Seroma drainage on POD 13 | Graft complications | Marginal | Preoperative radiotherapy | 30 | Alive, no evidence of disease |
| Patient 7 | 19 M | Alveolar soft tissue sarcoma GX T2N0M0 | SFA | SFV | Autologous vein | Autologous vein | LD | Hematoma evacuation on POD 23 | Wide | None | 6 | Alive, no evidence of disease | |
| Patient 8 | 75 M | Synovial sarcoma metastases | EIA ‐ SFA | EIV – SFV | Allograft | Allograft | LD | LD harvest site hematoma evacuation on POD 34. Ureter compression requiring pyelostoma on POD 41 | Vein graft thrombectomies on POD 2 and 13. Thrombus on POD 33, treated conservatively | Marginal | Postoperative radiotherapy | 2 | Alive, no evidence of disease |
Note: Grades presented according to the who classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone (Cancer IAfRo, 2013).
Abbreviations: DFA, deep femoral artery; DFV, deep femoral vein; EIA, external iliac artery; EIV, external iliac vein; F, female; LD, latissimus dorsi microvascular musculocutaneous flap; M, male; POD, postoperative day; PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; SFA, superficial femoral artery; SFV, superficial femoral vein.
Synthetic mesh.
Composite mesh used for inguinal ligament reconstruction and abdominal wall support.
Time of metastases detection reported in brackets.
Postoperative chemotherapy was not given due to delayed wound healing.
FIGURE 1Patient 7. (a) Preoperative T1–weighted axial MRI image of the tumor; (b) perioperative photographs illustrating the resection; (c) reconstructed superficial femoral artery and vein; (d) soft tissue reconstruction with microvascular LD flap to fill the defect cavity; (e) postoperative photograph at 3 months
Perioperative details for patients with soft tissue sarcoma who underwent tumor removal and vascular reconstruction
| ID | Duration of operation (h) | Blood volume loss during surgery (ml) | Units of red blood cells transfused ( | Days in HDU | Days in hospital | Perioperative complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 8.9 | NA | NA | 1 | 11 | 3b |
| Patient 2 | 8.1 | 860 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 3b |
| Patient 3 | 4.3 | 1565 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3b |
| Patient 4 | 8.8 | 2035 | 2 | 1 | 10 | None |
| Patient 5 | 5.3 | 1735 | 2 | 0 | 10 | None |
| Patient 6 | 7.1 | 92 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3a |
| Patient 7 | 7.7 | 1300 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3b |
| Patient 8 | 9.1 | 5000 | 14 | 2 | 54 | 3b |
Abbreviation: HDU, high dependency unit.
Within 30 days of surgery.
FIGURE 2Patient 5. (a) Preoperative image; (b) perioperative image displaying reconstructed superficial femoral artery and vein that were initially covered with direct apposition of the muscles; (c) Seroma infection in the area following postoperative radiotherapy; (d) final result following revision and LD flap to fill the defect cavity
Graft patency and functional outcomes for patients with soft tissue sarcoma who underwent tumor removal and vascular reconstruction in Helsinki University Hospital from 2014 to 2020
| ID | Time from surgery (months) | Graft patency | Lymphedema | Compressive sock use/appropriate | MSTS (%) | TESS (%) | Gait |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 76 | Artery patent, vein obstructed at 4 months | 14 | Yes/No | 80 | 85 | Normal |
| Patient 2 | 52 | Artery patent, vein obstructed at 23 months | 13 | Yes/Yes | 43 | 75 | Unsteady, uses a crutch |
| Patient 3 | 48 | Artery obstructed at 21 months, vein patent | 2 | No/No | 70 | 89 | Normal. Claudication at 40 m |
| Patient 4 | |||||||
| Patient 5 | 48 | Artery stenosed, vein obstructed at 6 months | 144 | Yes/Yes | 70 | 90 | Normal |
| Patient 6 | 33 | Artery and vein patent | 23 | Yes/No | 70 | 100 | Normal |
| Patient 7 | 6 | Artery patent, vein obstructed since last assessment | 3 | No/No | 87 | 91 | Normal |
| Patient 8 |
Abbreviations: MSTS, The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 1993 score; TESS, The Toronto extremity salvage score.
Volume difference in comparison with the non‐operated side.
Lost to follow‐up.
Only discharged from hospital at time of writing. Venous graft obstructed on postoperative day 33, artery patent.