Ying Fan1, Yue Dong2, Huan Wang3, Hongbo Wang4, Xinyan Sun2, Xiaoyu Wang2, Peng Zhao2, Yahong Luo2, Xiran Jiang5. 1. School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Liaoning, 110122, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Liaoning, 110042, People's Republic of China. 3. Radiation Oncology Department of Thoracic Cancer, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Liaoning, 110042, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China. 5. School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Liaoning, 110122, People's Republic of China. xrjiang@cmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore values of multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics for detecting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and resistance (T790M) mutation in lung adenocarcinoma (LA) patients with spinal metastasis. METHODS: This study enrolled a group of 160 LA patients from our hospital (between Jan. 2017 and Feb. 2021) to build a primary cohort. An external cohort was developed with 32 patients from another hospital (between Jan. 2017 and Jan. 2021). All patients underwent spinal MRI (including T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (T2FS)) scans. Radiomics features were extracted from the metastasis for each patient and selected to develop radiomics signatures (RSs) for detecting the EGFR and T790M mutations. The clinical-radiomics nomogram models were constructed with RSs and important clinical parameters. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predication capabilities of each model. Calibration and decision curve analyses (DCA) were constructed to verify the performance of the models. RESULTS: For detecting the EGFR and T790M mutation, the developed RSs comprised 9 and 4 most important features, respectively. The constructed nomogram models incorporating RSs and smoking status showed favorite prediction efficacy, with AUCs of 0.849 (Sen = 0.685, Spe = 0.885), 0.828 (Sen = 0.964, Spe = 0.692), and 0.778 (Sen = 0.611, Spe = 0.929) in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets for detecting the EGFR mutation, respectively, and with AUCs of 0.0.842 (Sen = 0.750, Spe = 0.867), 0.823 (Sen = 0.667, Spe = 0.938), and 0.800 (Sen = 0.875, Spe = 0.800) in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets for detecting the T790M mutation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics features from the spinal metastasis were predictive on both EGFR and T790M mutations. The constructed nomogram models can be potentially considered as new markers to guild treatment management in LA patients with spinal metastasis. KEY POINTS: • To our knowledge, this study was the first approach to detect the EGFR T790M mutation based on spinal metastasis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. • We identified 13 MRI features that were strongly associated with the EGFR T790M mutation. • The proposed nomogram models can be considered as potential new markers for detecting EGFR and T790M mutations based on spinal metastasis.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore values of multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics for detecting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and resistance (T790M) mutation in lung adenocarcinoma (LA) patients with spinal metastasis. METHODS: This study enrolled a group of 160 LA patients from our hospital (between Jan. 2017 and Feb. 2021) to build a primary cohort. An external cohort was developed with 32 patients from another hospital (between Jan. 2017 and Jan. 2021). All patients underwent spinal MRI (including T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (T2FS)) scans. Radiomics features were extracted from the metastasis for each patient and selected to develop radiomics signatures (RSs) for detecting the EGFR and T790M mutations. The clinical-radiomics nomogram models were constructed with RSs and important clinical parameters. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predication capabilities of each model. Calibration and decision curve analyses (DCA) were constructed to verify the performance of the models. RESULTS: For detecting the EGFR and T790M mutation, the developed RSs comprised 9 and 4 most important features, respectively. The constructed nomogram models incorporating RSs and smoking status showed favorite prediction efficacy, with AUCs of 0.849 (Sen = 0.685, Spe = 0.885), 0.828 (Sen = 0.964, Spe = 0.692), and 0.778 (Sen = 0.611, Spe = 0.929) in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets for detecting the EGFR mutation, respectively, and with AUCs of 0.0.842 (Sen = 0.750, Spe = 0.867), 0.823 (Sen = 0.667, Spe = 0.938), and 0.800 (Sen = 0.875, Spe = 0.800) in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets for detecting the T790M mutation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics features from the spinal metastasis were predictive on both EGFR and T790M mutations. The constructed nomogram models can be potentially considered as new markers to guild treatment management in LA patients with spinal metastasis. KEY POINTS: • To our knowledge, this study was the first approach to detect the EGFR T790M mutation based on spinal metastasis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. • We identified 13 MRI features that were strongly associated with the EGFR T790M mutation. • The proposed nomogram models can be considered as potential new markers for detecting EGFR and T790M mutations based on spinal metastasis.
Authors: Cai-Hong Yun; Kristen E Mengwasser; Angela V Toms; Michele S Woo; Heidi Greulich; Kwok-Kin Wong; Matthew Meyerson; Michael J Eck Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-01-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Helena A Yu; Maria E Arcila; Natasha Rekhtman; Camelia S Sima; Maureen F Zakowski; William Pao; Mark G Kris; Vincent A Miller; Marc Ladanyi; Gregory J Riely Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Maximilian J Hochmair; Anna Buder; Sophia Schwab; Otto C Burghuber; Helmut Prosch; Wolfgang Hilbe; Agnieszka Cseh; Richard Fritz; Martin Filipits Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Tereza Vaclova; Ursula Grazini; Lewis Ward; Daniel O'Neill; Aleksandra Markovets; Xiangning Huang; Juliann Chmielecki; Ryan Hartmaier; Kenneth S Thress; Paul D Smith; J Carl Barrett; Julian Downward; Elza C de Bruin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Sara Elena Rebuzzi; Roberta Alfieri; Silvia La Monica; Roberta Minari; Pier Giorgio Petronini; Marcello Tiseo Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 6.312