Literature DB >> 35727491

Serum glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) levels in COVID-19-associated mucormycosis: results of a case-control study.

Valliappan Muthu1, Manpreet Dhaliwal2, Arunima Sharma3, Divya Nair1, H Mohan Kumar4, Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy3, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal1, Hansraj Choudhary3, Naresh Panda5, Arunaloke Chakrabarti3, Ritesh Agarwal6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In experimental models, the expression of glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) in endothelial cells played a role in the pathogenesis of mucormycosis. However, the role of GRP78 in COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) has not been studied. We hypothesized that serum GRP78 levels are elevated in subjects with CAM.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the serum GRP78 levels in subjects with CAM and COVID-19 controls without mucormycosis. DESIGN AND
SETTING: We performed a hospital-based, case-control study between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2021. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 24 subjects each of CAM and COVID-19 subjects without mucormycosis. We also measured serum GRP78 levels in ten healthy controls. EXPOSURE: The primary exposure studied was serum GRP78 concentration, estimated using a commercially available ELISA kit in stored serum samples.
RESULTS: We found the mean ± standard deviation (SD) serum GRP78 levels significantly higher (p = 0.0001) among the CAM (374.3 ± 127.3 pg/mL) than the COVID-19 (246.4 ± 67.0 pg/mL) controls. The proportion of subjects with an abnormal GRP78 level (> mean [184.8 pg/mL] plus two SD [23.2 pg/mL] of GRP78 from healthy participants) was 87.5% and 45.8% in the CAM group and COVID-19 controls, respectively. Serum GRP78 level was independently associated with CAM (odds ratio 1.011; 95% confidence interval [1.002-1.019]) after adjusting for diabetes mellitus and hypoxemia during acute COVID-19.
CONCLUSION: Serum GRP78 levels were significantly higher in CAM than in COVID-19 controls. Further studies are required to the role of GRP78 in the pathogenesis of CAM.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endothelium; GRP; Heat shock protein; Mucorales; Rhizopus; SARS-CoV-2; Zygomycosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35727491      PMCID: PMC9209319          DOI: 10.1007/s11046-022-00645-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycopathologia        ISSN: 0301-486X            Impact factor:   3.785


Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggered an epidemic of mucormycosis worldwide, particularly in India [1]. Diabetes mellitus and glucocorticoid use were believed to be the significant risk factors for COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) [2]. A few small studies also suggested zinc supplementation as one cause of India's CAM outbreak [3-5]. However, CAM was also reported from countries where poorly controlled diabetes mellitus was not prevalent or zinc supplementation was not used [6, 7]. Hence, there must be several unexplored factors [2, 8]. Experimental studies conducted in the previous decade identified a novel host receptor (the 78 kilo-Dalton glucose-regulated protein 78 [GRP78]) on the endothelial cells that enabled invasion by Rhizopus arrhizus [9, 10] the most common etiologic agent causing mucormycosis [11]. Recently, GRP78 has also been shown to be a potential receptor for SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19 disease [12, 13]. The association of GRP78 (in serum and lung tissues) with COVID-19 has been supported by several observational studies conducted in the last two years [12, 14–17]. We hypothesized that the serum GRP78 levels are likely to be raised in subjects with CAM. Our primary objective was to estimate the serum GRP78 levels in subjects with CAM versus the COVID-19 controls.

Methods

Study design and setting:

We conducted a retrospective, hospital-based, case–control study between 1st April and 31st May 2021. The Institute Ethics Committee approved the study protocol. We were granted a consent waiver, as we used anonymized patient data. A part of the patient data has been published previously [4, 18]. We report the study as per the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement (Supplemental file) [19].

Cases and controls:

We enrolled consecutive subjects with CAM (cases) and COVID-19 subjects without mucormycosis (COVID-19-controls) from the emergency services of our hospital. We diagnosed COVID-19 using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs. Mucormycosis was diagnosed in participants with compatible clinico-radiological features and confirmed microbiologically (smear showing aseptate hyphae or culture growth of Mucorales) or pathologically in tissue samples [1, 20]. We labeled subjects as CAM when the diagnosis of mucormycosis was concurrent or within eight weeks of COVID-19 diagnosis [4, 18]. The COVID-19 controls were hospitalized subjects with acute COVID-19 illness with no evidence of mucormycosis. We followed the controls for at least eight weeks after enrolment to ensure they had not developed mucormycosis.

Exposure assessment:

The primary exposure of interest was serum GRP78 levels between cases and controls.

Study procedure:

We retrieved the following information from our clinical records: (1) age, (2) sex, (3) the presence of diabetes mellitus or other risk factors for mucormycosis, (4) hypoxemia during acute COVID-19 (defined as oxygen saturation < 94% or the need for supplemental oxygen or respiratory support to maintain saturation ≥ 94%), (5) glucocorticoid therapy for COVID-19 illness, (6) the site of involvement by mucormycosis (rhino-orbital mucormycosis [ROM], pulmonary and others), and (7) laboratory parameters (complete blood count, renal functions, glycated hemoglobin, serum iron, and serum ferritin levels), if available. Measurement of serum GRP78 levels: We used serum samples of subjects stored at -80 degrees Celsius. The blood samples were obtained within 48 h of hospitalization for CAM (for cases) or the acute COVID-19 illness (for COVID-19 controls). We used the human GRP78 ELISA kit (Elabscience, E-EL-H5586; detection range [630–40000 pg/mL], sensitivity [380 pg/mL]) to estimate the GRP78 levels in serum samples as per the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, we added the samples to the micro-ELISA plate wells pre-coated with an antibody specific to human GRP78. We conducted the experiment on blinded samples in duplicate and recorded the optical density (OD) at 450 nm (Epoch2 Microplate reader, BioTek Instruments, Inc., USA). We calculated the GRP78 values by comparing the mean OD of the samples with the standard curve using the linear equation (y = 0.1218*x + 0.1538), where x represents the mean OD of the samples, and y represents the serum GRP78 concentration in samples expressed as pg/mL. We estimated the mean and standard deviation of serum GRP78 among healthy controls as its normal value is unknown. We selected ten (7/10 women; mean [range] age, 26 [21-28] years) healthy controls with no chronic illness, including diabetes mellitus or other risk factors for mucormycosis, history of smoking or substance abuse, or symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 illness at enrollment. None of the included healthy controls had a history of COVID-19 infection, except one who experienced mild COVID-19 illness nine months before estimating the GRP78 level. A value of serum GRP78 greater than the sum of the mean and two SDs of healthy controls was labeled as positive GRP78. We also compared the proportion of subjects with positive GRP78 between CAM cases and COVID-19 controls. As an exploratory analysis, we compared the serum GRP78 levels of CAM patients who survived vs. non-survivors.

Statistical analysis:

We used the commercially available statistical software package SPSS 22.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Armonk NY, US). Data are presented as numbers with percentages or mean with standard deviation (SD). To adjust for confounders, we performed a binary logistic regression analysis to determine if serum GRP78 was independently associated with CAM after adjusting for diabetes mellitus and hypoxemia during COVID-19 illness. Further, we compared serum GRP78 in subjects with and without diabetes mellitus. The differences between categorical and continuous variables were compared using the chi-square test and the student t-test. We report the strength of association as an odds ratio (OR with 95% confidence interval [CI]). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We enrolled 24 subjects each of CAM and COVID-19 without mucormycosis (Table 1). The mean (SD) age of the entire study population was 53.4 (13.1) years. More subjects with CAM had diabetes mellitus than the COVID-19 controls (70.8% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.04). Hypoxemia during acute COVID-19 was more frequent in the COVID-19 controls than in the CAM cases (95.8% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.01). Serum iron and ferritin levels were not significantly different between the two groups.
Table 1

Clinical and laboratory features of COVID-19 controls and subjects with COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM)

ParametersCOVID-19 controls (n = 24)CAM cases (n = 24)p-value
Age in years58.0 ± 12.852.3 ± 14.3)0.15
Male sex17/24 (70.8)18/24 (75)0.75
Diabetes mellitus9/24 (37.5)19/24 (70.8)0.008
Diabetic ketoacidosis3/9 (33.3)9/19 (47.4)0.48
Hematological malignancy1/24 (4.2)01.00
Hypoxemia during COVID-1923/24 (95.8)15/24 (62.5)0.01
Glucocorticoids for COVID-1917/22 (77.3)18/23 (78.3)1.00
Site-
 Rhino-orbital mucormycosis19/24 (79.2)
 Pulmonary mucormycosis5/24 (20.8)
 Othersa
Hemoglobin, g/dL11.7 ± 2.212.5 ± 2.70.28
Total leukocyte count, cells/mm314885 ± 704516243 ± 73910.52
Platelet count, cells/mm3208 ± 100245 ± 1140.25
Urea, mg/dL75.3 ± 70.467.8 ± 51.30.68
Serum creatinine, mg/dL2.5 ± 3.61.5 ± 1.50.24
Glycated hemoglobin b %7.9 ± 2.210.8 ± 3.50.07
Serum iron, μg/dL60.2 ± 42.947.0 ± 41.80.31
Serum ferritin, ng/mL1954 ± 18762102 ± 17890.78

The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number/total numbers (percentage)

aIncludes one case each of renal and cutaneous mucormycosis

bData on glycated hemoglobins available for 13/17 in the cases and 7/9 COVID-19 controls with diabetes mellitus

COVID-19 – coronavirus disease 2019; GRP78 – glucose related protein 78; ROM – rhino-orbital mucormycosis

Clinical and laboratory features of COVID-19 controls and subjects with COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number/total numbers (percentage) aIncludes one case each of renal and cutaneous mucormycosis bData on glycated hemoglobins available for 13/17 in the cases and 7/9 COVID-19 controls with diabetes mellitus COVID-19 – coronavirus disease 2019; GRP78 – glucose related protein 78; ROM – rhino-orbital mucormycosis Primary objective: We found serum GRP78 concentration significantly higher among CAM cases (374.3 ± 127.3 pg/mL) than in the COVID-19 (246.4 ± 67.0 pg/mL) controls (Fig. 1, Table 2). The mean ± SD serum GRP78 level was also higher in subjects with COVID-19 (n = 48; including both cases and controls) than in the healthy individuals (310.4 ± 119.6 pg/mL vs. 184.8 ± 23.2 pg/mL; p = 0.002). The proportion of subjects with an abnormal GRP78 (i.e., > 231.2 pg/mL) was higher among CAM cases than the COVID-19 controls (87.5% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.01).
Fig. 1

Violin plot shows serum glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) levels in COVID-19 controls and COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) cases. The solid central line in the plot represents the median value, while the dotted line below and above the median denotes the first and third quartiles, respectively. The concentration of GRP78 in the serum of CAM subjects was significantly (****) higher than COVID-19 controls

Table 2

Serum GRP78 in the study groups

ParametersCOVID-19 controls (n = 24)CAM cases (n = 24)ap-value
DM (n = 9)No DM (n = 15)DM (n = 19)No DM (n = 5)
Serum GRP78, pg/mL b267.2 ± 72.8234.0 ± 62.4372.8 ± 122.5380.1 ± 160.20.005
Positive GRP78 b5/9 (55.5)6/15 (40.0)17/19 (89.5)4/5 (80.0)0.0001

The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number/total numbers (percentage)

COVID-19 – coronavirus disease 2019; CAM – COVID-19-associated mucormycosis; DM – diabetes mellitus; GRP78 – glucose related protein 78

aBetween CAM cases and COVID-19 control groups

bThe difference between those with and without diabetes mellitus was not statistically significant (p-values not shown)

The mean ± SD serum GRP78 in the healthy participants was 184.8 ± 23.2 pg/mL. We defined positive GRP78 as concentration > (mean + 2SD value of healthy controls) i.e., 231.2 pg/mL

Violin plot shows serum glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) levels in COVID-19 controls and COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) cases. The solid central line in the plot represents the median value, while the dotted line below and above the median denotes the first and third quartiles, respectively. The concentration of GRP78 in the serum of CAM subjects was significantly (****) higher than COVID-19 controls Serum GRP78 in the study groups The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number/total numbers (percentage) COVID-19 – coronavirus disease 2019; CAM – COVID-19-associated mucormycosis; DM – diabetes mellitus; GRP78 – glucose related protein 78 aBetween CAM cases and COVID-19 control groups bThe difference between those with and without diabetes mellitus was not statistically significant (p-values not shown) The mean ± SD serum GRP78 in the healthy participants was 184.8 ± 23.2 pg/mL. We defined positive GRP78 as concentration > (mean + 2SD value of healthy controls) i.e., 231.2 pg/mL On binary logistic regression analysis, serum GRP78 was independently associated with CAM (OR [95% CI], 1.011 [1.002–1.019]) after adjusting for diabetes mellitus and hypoxemia during acute COVID-19 (Table 3).
Table 3

Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrating the factors associated with the mucormycosis in COVID-19 patients

VariablesCOVID-19 controls (n = 24)CAM cases (n = 24)Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)p-value
Diabetes mellitus9/24 (37.5)19/24 (70.8)4.462 (0.950–20.96)0.06
Hypoxemia during COVID-1923/24 (95.8)15/24 (62.5)0.150 (0.012–1.856)0.14
Serum GRP78, pg/mL246.4 ± 67.0374.3 ± 127.31.011 (1.002–1.019)0.01

The values are presented as numbers/total number (percentage) or mean ± standard deviation

COVID-19 – coronavirus disease 2019; CAM – COVID-19-associated mucormycosis; GRP78 – glucose related protein 78

Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrating the factors associated with the mucormycosis in COVID-19 patients The values are presented as numbers/total number (percentage) or mean ± standard deviation COVID-19 – coronavirus disease 2019; CAM – COVID-19-associated mucormycosis; GRP78 – glucose related protein 78 The information on mortality was available for 19/24 CAM subjects and only 5/19 (26.3%) survived. The mean serum GRP78 level was not significantly different between survivors and non-survivors (425.9 pg/mL vs. 387.6 pg/mL; p = 0.59).

Discussion

We found significantly higher serum GRP78 levels among subjects with CAM than in COVID-19. GRP78, a member of the heat shock protein family, plays a vital role in the unfolded protein response [29-31]. GRP78 is expressed in the endoplasmic reticulum of various tissues, including bronchial epithelial cells and endothelium. GRP78 has at least four domains to which several ligands, including viruses [21, 22], peptides (RoY) [23], and autoantibodies can bind [31]. Different ligands may cause different effects upon binding to GRP78 (e.g., promoting angiogenesis, inhibiting cell proliferation, or inducing apoptosis) [23, 24]. GRP78 is also a co-receptor facilitating the entry of SARS-CoV-2 [12, 13]. In a prospective case–control study, the serum GRP78 levels were significantly higher in subjects with COVID-19 infection (with or without pneumonia) than in healthy controls or pneumonia because of causes other than COVID-19 [16]. The serum GRP78 values were also higher in non-COVID-19 pneumonia versus the healthy controls; however, the greatest elevation was seen in the COVID-19 group [16]. GRP78 expression is a marker of cellular stress and has been observed in several conditions, including malignancies, infections (viral and bacterial), and metabolic disorders like obesity and diabetes [25]. While GRP78 may be elevated in several infectious and non-infectious conditions, a significantly higher level of GRP78 noted in our study and a previous study on COVID-19 subjects suggests an association with SARS-CoV-2 infection [16]. The higher levels in COVID-19 infection are likely because of a positive feedback loop existing between SARS-CoV-2 infection and GRP78 expression [26, 27]. Alternatively, our study's higher serum GRP78 concentration could have been because of diabetes mellitus (more frequently noted in the cases than in the controls) rather than COVID-19. However, the multivariate analysis and the subgroup analysis suggest GRP78 to be independently associated with CAM after adjusting for diabetes. What do our study results imply? Diabetes mellitus and a high environmental burden of Mucorales were present in India even before the COVID-19 pandemic and probably explained the high background incidence of mucormycosis (70 times higher than reported elsewhere) [28, 32]. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a definite rise in the cases of mucormycosis not only in India[1] but also in Germany[7] and several other countries[33] compared to the pre-pandemic period. Also, the proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus reported from other countries[7, 34] was much lower (7/30, 23.3%) in CAM than in our cohort. Intuitively, COVID-19 or its treatment should have contributed to the CAM outbreak. We have previously shown that inappropriate glucocorticoid use was associated with CAM [1]. We now provide indirect evidence implicating SARS-CoV-2 in the pathogenesis of CAM. Nearly all subjects with CAM had an elevated serum GRP78 concentration, significantly higher than COVID-19 controls. Our study has a few limitations, the most important being the small sample size and monocentric design. We have not studied the expression of GRP78 in endothelial cells or lung tissue. Nevertheless, elevated serum GRP78 level could be a surrogate for increased expression at a cellular level and provides indirect evidence of their association with CAM. A high serum GRP78 was noted in a study of patients with renal carcinoma who had higher tissue expression of GRP78 [35]. However, more studies are required, particularly in diabetic subjects, to determine the correlation between tissue expression and circulating GRP78. While tissue expression of GRP78 in endothelial cells has been shown previously in an allogeneic transplant recipient with mucormycosis [36], there is no published data on serum GRP78 levels. We do not know the normal serum GRP78 level, its significance, and the probable factors (such as age, sex, ethnicity, the method used for estimating GRP78, sample storage, and several others) that could influence the levels. The elevated GRP78 in serum could also be because of other co-infection or unknown confounding factors in the CAM group. Thus, the current study is hypothesis-generating and needs further confirmation. Also, we did not include subjects with mucormycosis unrelated to COVID-19. Apart from COVID-19 and CAM, assaying GRP78 in diabetes mellitus (with and without mucormycosis) is likely to improve our understanding. In conclusion, we found higher serum GRP78 levels in CAM than in COVID-19 and healthy controls. More extensive prospective studies are required, preferably in subjects of mucormycosis without diabetes mellitus, to confirm our findings. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file 1 (PDF 116 KB)
  28 in total

1.  The endothelial cell receptor GRP78 is required for mucormycosis pathogenesis in diabetic mice.

Authors:  Mingfu Liu; Brad Spellberg; Quynh T Phan; Yue Fu; Yong Fu; Amy S Lee; John E Edwards; Scott G Filler; Ashraf S Ibrahim
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  CotH3 mediates fungal invasion of host cells during mucormycosis.

Authors:  Teclegiorgis Gebremariam; Mingfu Liu; Guanpingsheng Luo; Vincent Bruno; Quynh T Phan; Alan J Waring; John E Edwards; Scott G Filler; Michael R Yeaman; Ashraf S Ibrahim
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Clinical-epidemiological Profile of Coronavirus Disease 19 Associated Mucomycosis (CAM) and Relation with Zinc and Iron Levels.

Authors:  Ritu Karoli; Manish Raj Kulshreshtha; Nikhil Gupta; Mridu Singh; Vikram Singh; Shobhit Shakya
Journal:  J Assoc Physicians India       Date:  2022-02

4.  Results from a national survey on COVID-19-associated mucormycosis in Germany: 13 patients from six tertiary hospitals.

Authors:  Danila Seidel; Michaela Simon; Rosanne Sprute; Matthias Lubnow; Katja Evert; Claudius Speer; Jessica Seeßle; Elham Khatamzas; Uta Merle; Christopher Behrens; Igor Wolfgang Blau; Philipp Enghard; Christian S Haas; Joerg Steinmann; Oliver Kurzai; Oliver A Cornely
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.931

5.  Role of Zinc and Clinicopathological Factors for COVID-19-Associated Mucormycosis (CAM) in a Rural Hospital of Central India: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar; Sourya Acharya; Shraddha Jain; Samarth Shukla; Dhruv Talwar; Divit Shah; Vidyashree Hulkoti; Sana Parveen; Mansi Patel; Sujal Patel
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-23

6.  Recognition through GRP78 is enhanced in the UK, South African, and Brazilian variants of SARS-CoV-2; An in silico perspective.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Ibrahim; Abdo A Elfiky; Alaa M Elgohary
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Multicenter Epidemiologic Study of Coronavirus Disease-Associated Mucormycosis, India.

Authors:  Atul Patel; Ritesh Agarwal; Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy; Manoj Shevkani; Immaculata Xess; Ratna Sharma; Jayanthi Savio; Nandini Sethuraman; Surabhi Madan; Prakash Shastri; Deepak Thangaraju; Rungmei Marak; Karuna Tadepalli; Pratik Savaj; Ayesha Sunavala; Neha Gupta; Tanu Singhal; Valliappan Muthu; Arunaloke Chakrabarti
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.