Literature DB >> 35726000

Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional U-Net architectures for segmentation of adipose tissue in cardiac magnetic resonance images.

Michaela Kulasekara1, Vu Quang Dinh1, Maria Fernandez-Del-Valle2,3, Jon D Klingensmith4.   

Abstract

The process of identifying cardiac adipose tissue (CAT) from volumetric magnetic resonance imaging of the heart is tedious, time-consuming, and often dependent on observer interpretation. Many 2-dimensional (2D) convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been implemented to automate the cardiac segmentation process, but none have attempted to identify CAT. Furthermore, the results from automatic segmentation of other cardiac structures leave room for improvement. This study investigated the viability of a 3-dimensional (3D) CNN in comparison to a similar 2D CNN. Both models used a U-Net architecture to simultaneously classify CAT, left myocardium, left ventricle, and right myocardium. The multi-phase model trained with multiple observers' segmentations reached a whole-volume Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.925 across all classes and 0.640 for CAT specifically; the corresponding 2D model's DSC across all classes was 0.902 and 0.590 for CAT specifically. This 3D model also achieved a higher level of CAT-specific DSC agreement with a group of observers with a Williams Index score of 0.973 in comparison to the 2D model's score of 0.822.
© 2022. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional neural networks; Epicardial adipose tissue; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35726000     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02612-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   3.079


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?

Authors:  N G Bellenger; M I Burgess; S G Ray; A Lahiri; A J Coats; J G Cleland; D J Pennell
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Automated segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Michael R Kaus; Jens von Berg; Jürgen Weese; Wiro Niessen; Vladimir Pekar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 3.  Ectopic fat depots and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kathryn A Britton; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Local and systemic effects of the multifaceted epicardial adipose tissue depot.

Authors:  Gianluca Iacobellis
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 5.  Epicardial adipose tissue: far more than a fat depot.

Authors:  Andrew H Talman; Peter J Psaltis; James D Cameron; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-12

6.  Fully convolutional multi-scale residual DenseNets for cardiac segmentation and automated cardiac diagnosis using ensemble of classifiers.

Authors:  Mahendra Khened; Varghese Alex Kollerathu; Ganapathy Krishnamurthi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging: a wealth of cardiovascular information.

Authors:  Sangeeta Shah; Emanuel D Chryssos; Hugh Parker
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2009

Review 8.  Obesity and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Paul Poirier; Robert H Eckel
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.113

9.  Subcutaneous adipose tissue & visceral adipose tissue.

Authors:  Balraj Mittal
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  Deep Learning for Cardiac Image Segmentation: A Review.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Chen Qin; Huaqi Qiu; Giacomo Tarroni; Jinming Duan; Wenjia Bai; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.